The South Australian Political Landscape

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.
Post Reply
User avatar
Grenville
Veteran
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:53 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 262 times
Been thanked: 761 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Grenville »

Wedgie wrote:People forget Nick was on the side of a pokies Baron against a sporting club many years ago, most forget but I don't. Hypocrite much?
Some people including the media love his little games but it doesn't impress me, probably the last bloke I'd vote for at any level.


No,no,no you're wrong Wedgie lad. Troy McLure, sorry Nick Xenophon, is the dinkum article. A man of true integrity.
User avatar
DOC
Coach
Posts: 20274
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:15 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 934 times
Been thanked: 2497 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by DOC »

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/multibilliondollar-vision-south-australian-liberals-plan-new-road-airport-rail-bypass/news-story/417feff30faf089bed8608f221ba7ce4?utm_source=The%20Advertiser&utm_mediam=email&utm_campaign=editorial

Wow! A 24/7 airport for Monarto for export freight. Anyone who has anything to do with freight would not advise him that this is viable under any circumstances. I now seriously question who is advising him and suggest that he seeks input from industry participants.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

DOC wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/multibilliondollar-vision-south-australian-liberals-plan-new-road-airport-rail-bypass/news-story/417feff30faf089bed8608f221ba7ce4?utm_source=The%20Advertiser&utm_mediam=email&utm_campaign=editorial

Wow! A 24/7 airport for Monarto for export freight. Anyone who has anything to do with freight would not advise him that this is viable under any circumstances. I now seriously question who is advising him and suggest that he seeks input from industry participants.


I think we have been baging them so much they came out with some crazy shit like this to make a big statement to say yeah we are still here.

Honestly, I'm not sure how much they have thought that out, the setup and infrastructure costs would be incredible really, I agree with you about the viability of it.

However in saying that its a idea outside the box and perhaps its a good way to start thinking for Adelaide.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1408 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Matt Osborn from One Community came out this morning as a Labor stooge
Anglicare may just find themselves losing a lot of donations
These shenanigans just supports my view that churches should be taxed if they want to make political statements

Anglicare has always had a discreet connection to the SA Labor party
Now its not so discreet.....................
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

We should be turning the key in the locks at the nRAH in about November. ( At current best guess )

So :

In 2007 Rann says it will cost $1.7bn

In 2009 it's "sold" to us that it will open in May 2016.

In reality :

It will cost over $2.5bn and if system testing proves accurate it will open in November 2017.

$800m over budget, 18 months late.

Marshall will still **** it up and lose.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Magellan
Coach
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:04 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Has thanked: 756 times
Been thanked: 1516 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Magellan »

Jimmy_041 wrote:Matt Osborn from One Community came out this morning as a Labor stooge
Anglicare may just find themselves losing a lot of donations
These shenanigans just supports my view that churches should be taxed if they want to make political statements

Anglicare has always had a discreet connection to the SA Labor party
Now its not so discreet.....................

What did he say?

BTW, whilst I'm not at issue with churches being taxed, I'm not sure that one's entitlement to free political expression should come for a fee.
"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

Magellan wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:Matt Osborn from One Community came out this morning as a Labor stooge
Anglicare may just find themselves losing a lot of donations
These shenanigans just supports my view that churches should be taxed if they want to make political statements

Anglicare has always had a discreet connection to the SA Labor party
Now its not so discreet.....................

What did he say?

BTW, whilst I'm not at issue with churches being taxed, I'm not sure that one's entitlement to free political expression should come for a fee.


Expression is one thing, influence is another.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
tipper
League - Top 5
Posts: 2896
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:45 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Peake
Has thanked: 362 times
Been thanked: 556 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by tipper »

Wedgie wrote:People forget Nick was on the side of a pokies Baron against a sporting club many years ago, most forget but I don't. Hypocrite much?
Some people including the media love his little games but it doesn't impress me, probably the last bloke I'd vote for at any level.


exactly right Wedgie. thankfully his fight then backfired on him spectacularly and North now have twice as many pokies as any other footy club in the state. now if only pokie machines could play footy.....
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1408 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Magellan wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:Matt Osborn from One Community came out this morning as a Labor stooge
Anglicare may just find themselves losing a lot of donations
These shenanigans just supports my view that churches should be taxed if they want to make political statements

Anglicare has always had a discreet connection to the SA Labor party
Now its not so discreet.....................

What did he say?

BTW, whilst I'm not at issue with churches being taxed, I'm not sure that one's entitlement to free political expression should come for a fee.


Abraham dug it out of him that he's a convener for the Labor Party
He kept trying to dodge the questions, but Abraham is like a dog with a bone when he wants to be

Churches love to pull the separation of church and state when it suits them.
If they want to make political statements; then they can pay for the privilege
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Magellan wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:Matt Osborn from One Community came out this morning as a Labor stooge
Anglicare may just find themselves losing a lot of donations
These shenanigans just supports my view that churches should be taxed if they want to make political statements

Anglicare has always had a discreet connection to the SA Labor party
Now its not so discreet.....................

What did he say?

BTW, whilst I'm not at issue with churches being taxed, I'm not sure that one's entitlement to free political expression should come for a fee.


Abraham dug it out of him that he's a convener for the Labor Party
He kept trying to dodge the questions, but Abraham is like a dog with a bone when he wants to be

Churches love to pull the separation of church and state when it suits them.
If they want to make political statements; then they can pay for the privilege


Yes and yes.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Magellan wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:Matt Osborn from One Community came out this morning as a Labor stooge
Anglicare may just find themselves losing a lot of donations
These shenanigans just supports my view that churches should be taxed if they want to make political statements

Anglicare has always had a discreet connection to the SA Labor party
Now its not so discreet.....................

What did he say?

BTW, whilst I'm not at issue with churches being taxed, I'm not sure that one's entitlement to free political expression should come for a fee.


Abraham dug it out of him that he's a convener for the Labor Party
He kept trying to dodge the questions, but Abraham is like a dog with a bone when he wants to be

Churches love to pull the separation of church and state when it suits them.
If they want to make political statements; then they can pay for the privilege


That maybe true for Anglicare in this case and I agree with your statements, but the Liberals, mostly the conservatives are also fairly well connected to the church as well. I think the good people of the cloth seem to have a influence regardless of the party in power.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1408 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

stan wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
Magellan wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:Matt Osborn from One Community came out this morning as a Labor stooge
Anglicare may just find themselves losing a lot of donations
These shenanigans just supports my view that churches should be taxed if they want to make political statements

Anglicare has always had a discreet connection to the SA Labor party
Now its not so discreet.....................

What did he say?

BTW, whilst I'm not at issue with churches being taxed, I'm not sure that one's entitlement to free political expression should come for a fee.


Abraham dug it out of him that he's a convener for the Labor Party
He kept trying to dodge the questions, but Abraham is like a dog with a bone when he wants to be

Churches love to pull the separation of church and state when it suits them.
If they want to make political statements; then they can pay for the privilege


That maybe true for Anglicare in this case and I agree with your statements, but the Liberals, mostly the conservatives are also fairly well connected to the church as well. I think the good people of the cloth seem to have a influence regardless of the party in power.


I just noticed Grant Chapman is on the Board of Anglicare
Lynn Arnold was CEO at one stage.
I like Lynn. He's not your usual Labor person - the ends do not justify the means
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

So, you wanted a 5 year contract?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-31/j ... th/8226412

The head of two major public hospitals in Adelaide, the Royal Adelaide and Queen Elizabeth, has been sacked.

Julia Squire had been chief executive of the Central Adelaide Local Health Network.

Late last year, the nursing union said Ms Squire had promised not to shut down a 20-bed ward, S7, at the Royal Adelaide.

It was closed this month but threats of industrial action from nurses saw it reopened by SA Health, under what it said was a flexible arrangement based on patient demand.

SA Health said its deputy chief executive Len Richards had taken over the vacated role for now, and would continue until after the opening of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital later in the year.

Ms Squire was 16 months into a five-year contract when it was terminated last night.

SA Health's chief executive Vickie Kaminski would not be drawn on whether the problems over ward S7 were a factor in the sacking.

"We really need somebody with a more collaborative, more consultative style," Ms Kaminski said.

"What we're looking at is the need to move forward and when we think about what we have to do in the next several months, year, year-and-a-half, it just is a different leadership style."

Opposition spokesman for health Stephen Wade said he did not believe SA Health's reasons for sacking Ms Squire.

"We even have evidence in parliamentary committees with clinicians who are raising concerns about transforming health, praising the collaborative way that Julia Squire engaged with clinicians," Mr Wade said.

"SA Health is notorious for spin. I believe that Julia Squire has been made a scapegoat for the Government."

Ms Kaminski would not say how much the Government had to pay to terminate Ms Squire's contract so early.

SA Health deputy chief executive Len Richards will act in the role through to the opening of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital, which is expected to be later this year.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by heater31 »

Given my line of work theses days I've come to the conclusion that this entire department has an attitude problem. They just do as they please and don't care about anyone but themselves.....


Needs a clean out of major proportions maybe start with the minister :roll:
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by bennymacca »

Health in SA is a debacle.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

bennymacca wrote:Health in SA is a debacle.


Health, Families, Infrastructure......It's almost like the government don't know what they're doing.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

Booney wrote:
bennymacca wrote:Health in SA is a debacle.


Health, Families, Infrastructure......It's almost like the government don't know what they're doing.

And whats more incredible is they have been in power for something stupid like 13 years. The state Libs are just so useless its amazing.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

stan wrote:
Booney wrote:
bennymacca wrote:Health in SA is a debacle.


Health, Families, Infrastructure......It's almost like the government don't know what they're doing.

And whats more incredible is they have been in power for something stupid like 13 years. The state Libs are just so useless its amazing.


They've held the keys since February 2002.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

Booney wrote:
stan wrote:
Booney wrote:
bennymacca wrote:Health in SA is a debacle.


Health, Families, Infrastructure......It's almost like the government don't know what they're doing.

And whats more incredible is they have been in power for something stupid like 13 years. The state Libs are just so useless its amazing.


They've held the keys since February 2002.

Well **** me.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

stan wrote:Well **** me.


Hardly reason to celebrate but hey, your call.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests