Can't stand the SANFL & its supporters, yet posts about it/them
Constantly putting others down because you don't agree with them
Keep manning that ivory tower
morell wrote:Try integrating with an API using a published web service and using a series of SQL packages to restructure the data into a relational system. Then perhaps implement a segmentation tool, or a BI platform, to slice and split the data to mine.
By using data smart people can work out a heck of a lot very quickly.
Every time you run Facebook, that data gets put into a database. You liked the Sturt Club page? That's in a database. You made a status about going to the SANFL? That's in a database. You used your phone to navigate to an SANFL game? That's in a database. You used your credit card to buy tickets? That's in a database.
I don't mean to be rude and with as much respect as possible, Spargo, MW, Booney and other safooty.net posters, you've got no idea WTF you're talking about if you think you need to attend a game to work out the demographics of a supporter group. It's an incredibly stupid thing to say, in reality.

Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Absolutely!The Bedge wrote:morell wrote:MW wrote:get f..ked mate. I don't care how you describe the demographic of a supporter base. My beef is how you describe Ports "reserves" side like it should be some sort of easy beat.
It should! It absolutely should be an easy beat.
Ollie Wines, Paddy Ryder and Chad Wingard aren't playing.
Kids and rejects and has beens are.
Neade, Howard, Bonner, Marshall, Toumpas, Austin, Summerton, Krakouer, Palmer, YOung, Eddy, Johnson, White, Lobbe, Ah Chee, Gray.
Easy beats? Bloody hell man.
Where do I post? When was the last time you saw me post in the SANFL threads?Spargo wrote:Big Footy is a better forum, yet posts on here
What thread are we in numb nuts?Spargo wrote:Can't stand the SANFL & its supporters, yet posts about it/them
Don't post rubbish, wont get "put down". SimplesSpargo wrote:Constantly putting others down because you don't agree with them
Spargo wrote:Keep manning that ivory tower
morell wrote:Neade - reject
Howard - ill give you that one, still a kid though
Bonner - kid
Marshall - toddler
So really, Summerton and Eddy are the only 'senior' footballers on that list of any consistent quality aren't kids, rejects or has beens. You're trying to argue that this side is good right?
I recall SANFL supporters arguing that these kids getting games when they shouldn't ruins the SANFL because they're getting gifts.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
I do when the supporters of that competition start ragging on my football club.Booney wrote:And you don't need to keep posting such diatribe to demonstrate your disrespectful attitude towards the competition many of us grew up with. A competition that Port Adelaide have (had) such a rich and proud history in. A competition that many people still hold close to their heart.
I do. Which is why I am always insistent on the protection of that tradition and heritage in the AFL. The league, is irrelevant as the club, has moved.Booney wrote:"Smart" people, if you include yourself in that, also recognize the importance and immeasurable ( by any means ) commodity that tradition is, that passion is and the importance of pride in the colours handed down through generations.
I do agree, but even those things are becoming much rarer.Booney wrote:People like yourself "think" they're smart because they analyze things, people who are smart recognize that sometimes there's parameters that aren't measurable because they're human feelings. They're beyond calculations.
I don't think so. You're much close to "UK Fan" type than I.Booney wrote:You're in a club with UK.
Sure, but as you and I would know, they're playing Reserves for a reason. It's like if you're on an AFL list you're instantly a star AFL player.The Bedge wrote:morell wrote:Neade - reject
Howard - ill give you that one, still a kid though
Bonner - kid
Marshall - toddler
So really, Summerton and Eddy are the only 'senior' footballers on that list of any consistent quality aren't kids, rejects or has beens. You're trying to argue that this side is good right?
I recall SANFL supporters arguing that these kids getting games when they shouldn't ruins the SANFL because they're getting gifts.
These blokes were good enough to play in the AFL Elimination final, but no good for SANFL?
Robbie Young - he's 22yrs old, not sure you can call him a reject.
Ah Chee was runner up in the Magarey Medal.
White, Lobbe might be has been's but they're still very handy at SANFL level.
The "reject" claim is a really stupid one - they may be "rejects" from AFL level, does not make them an lesser of a footballer, and does not mean they aren't still very good at SANFL level.
It's like having a junior at your club who pays underage SANFL - they may not play each week, but bet you wouldn't turn them away at Mitchell Park because they're "rejects".. nope, they'd probably still be in your top group of players.
Booney wrote:We're ******, Chester has a Spike.
morell wrote:I do understand that it might be hard to hear because many of you are emotionally invested in the SANFL. But what i am saying is the truth.
You know it deep down, which is why you react with such animosity.
It's like the mum flailing the cop for telling her that her kid died in a car accident.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
The Bedge wrote:i'd like to announce i'm stepping down from this debate - i have a headache, and no amount of arguing will change his views.
Hope you bastards are happy - this is the bloke you appointed imaginary coach
Lightning McQueen wrote:A head like that should ache!
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
The Bedge wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:A head like that should ache!
Thanks bub, love you too x
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 167 guests