SWFC

Post by **Dutchy** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:00 pm

They obviously add nothing positive to the league, plenty of neighboring clubs for the players to go to, can't believe it is even a consideration for them to play in 2019.

When is the vote?

Arch44 · Post by **Arch44** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:19 pm

I'd be disappointed if my club (I'm not coaching any more) voted to keep them in.

Post by **Footy Chick** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:20 pm

Arch44 wrote:I'd be disappointed if my club (I'm not coaching any more) voted to keep them in.

There's history there too, Arch

jo172 · Post by **jo172** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:38 pm

Footy Chick wrote:
Arch44 wrote:I'd be disappointed if my club (I'm not coaching any more) voted to keep them in.

There's history there too, Arch

Nothing will ever top me for pure bizzareness seeing sent off Salisbury West A Graders scaling the stands at Norwood Oval to try and fight Fitzroy Reserves players.

Love a rumour · Post by **Love a rumour** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 7:01 pm

Weirdest thing about this whole Salisbury west situation is every club is willing to sign there players? Why when there supposedly thugs?

Dirty dog · Post by **Dirty dog** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 7:51 pm

Love a rumour wrote:Weirdest thing about this whole Salisbury west situation is every club is willing to sign there players? Why when there supposedly thugs?

Like Ardrossan?

Love a rumour · Post by **Love a rumour** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 8:17 pm

Dirty dog wrote:
Love a rumour wrote:Weirdest thing about this whole Salisbury west situation is every club is willing to sign there players? Why when there supposedly thugs?

Like Ardrossan?

Probably because there all good young blokes not thugs

scottroo · Post by **scottroo** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 8:38 pm

Voted out

Post by **Dutchy** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 9:27 pm

Only 1 positive vote

Post by **Dutchy** » Mon Nov 19, 2018 9:48 pm

Dutchy wrote:Only 1 positive vote

Themselves!

marbles · Post by **marbles** » Tue Nov 20, 2018 5:39 am

Is this the first time all clubs have voted to keep or kick out a club?

Have the previous culprits on AAA been voted in and put under a vote?

Can we do a vote to keep adelaide uni ?

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Nov 20, 2018 5:47 am

Booney wrote:
jo172 wrote:What's the over/under on yes votes?

10.5?

Surely no clubs are going to take the risk of hanging themselves out to dry?

I'll take what you're offering on the unders.

Best bet I've placed for weeks.

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:24 am

marbles wrote:Is this the first time all clubs have voted to keep or kick out a club?

Have the previous culprits on AAA been voted in and put under a vote?

Can we do a vote to keep adelaide uni ?

It might be a case of "all clubs present for the vote".

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Nov 20, 2018 8:27 am

Love a rumour wrote:Weirdest thing about this whole Salisbury west situation is every club is willing to sign there players? Why when there supposedly thugs?

It's a good point you raise. The club can only do so much then the onus is on the players to set a standard and change the on field expectations of each other.

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Tue Nov 20, 2018 8:44 am

Love a rumour wrote:Weirdest thing about this whole Salisbury west situation is every club is willing to sign there players? Why when there supposedly thugs?

Salisbury West has been the breeding ground for many talented juniors, I'm sure the wider community is smart enough to work out who is and isn't the right fit for their club.

jo172 · Post by **jo172** » Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:01 am

Booney wrote:
Love a rumour wrote:Weirdest thing about this whole Salisbury west situation is every club is willing to sign there players? Why when there supposedly thugs?

It's a good point you raise. The club can only do so much then the onus is on the players to set a standard and change the on field expectations of each other.

Counter point, Jason Creek had a horrific record at SWFC leading to his de-registration.

He then successfully played country football for a decade without incident.

4 weeks into resuming his career at SW he was again de-registered.

One person, but there would be something apparently in SW's culture whereby players who are appropriately in-line else where are out of line at SW.

I've said it before but look into the SW President's comments after the 2005 Grand Final. Not embarrassment, not contrition, but "we play hard, tough football not ballet". To speed it into modern times pulling your U18s from a Grand Final because you can't guarantee their behaviour.

The situation is more than the sum of its parts.

Q. · Post by Q. » Tue Nov 20, 2018 10:03 am

WTF was with SW strategy last night? Did they honestly think shifting blame and being defensive form word one was going to win the hearts & minds of the delegates? Unfathomable scenes.

laser · Post by **laser** » Tue Nov 20, 2018 10:20 am

Was it that bad? I wasn't there last night, but was at the meeting when Wingfield Royals made their plea and they actually got a reasonable number of votes. Jo maybe on the money, pointing to a culture and direction within the club leadership which needs an overhaul.

jo172 · Post by **jo172** » Tue Nov 20, 2018 12:55 pm

Q. wrote:WTF was with SW strategy last night? Did they honestly think shifting blame and being defensive form word one was going to win the hearts & minds of the delegates? Unfathomable scenes.

Playing the victim in a room full of your victims.

Bold

HH3 · Post by **HH3** » Tue Nov 20, 2018 12:59 pm

jo172 wrote:
Q. wrote:WTF was with SW strategy last night? Did they honestly think shifting blame and being defensive form word one was going to win the hearts & minds of the delegates? Unfathomable scenes.

Playing the victim in a room full of your victims.

Bold

SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Re: SWFC

Who is online