Planning your clubs next moveThe Bedge wrote:Is it true ATCA are exploring the option of forming a hard wicket comp next season as well to accommodate the clubs who are large and can't find turf decks for their lower grades / juniors?
ATCA
-
whufc
- Coach
- Posts: 29218
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: BSR
- Location: Blakeview
- Has thanked: 6065 times
- Been thanked: 2933 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
-
Port Pirie Power
- Rookie
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:49 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Not entirely sure on exact scores or how the game was played but pooraka beat themSonofbrowny25 wrote:anyone know how Pooraka went on the weekend against Kensington?
-
The Bedge
- Coach
- Posts: 17877
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:28 am
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Location: BarbeeCueAria
- Has thanked: 3336 times
- Been thanked: 4469 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Yep.whufc wrote:Planning your clubs next moveThe Bedge wrote:Is it true ATCA are exploring the option of forming a hard wicket comp next season as well to accommodate the clubs who are large and can't find turf decks for their lower grades / juniors?![]()
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
-
whufc
- Coach
- Posts: 29218
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: BSR
- Location: Blakeview
- Has thanked: 6065 times
- Been thanked: 2933 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Would be pretty decent actually.The Bedge wrote:Yep.whufc wrote:Planning your clubs next moveThe Bedge wrote:Is it true ATCA are exploring the option of forming a hard wicket comp next season as well to accommodate the clubs who are large and can't find turf decks for their lower grades / juniors?![]()
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
-
Senor Moto Gadili
- Veteran
- Posts: 3645
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Has thanked: 206 times
- Been thanked: 540 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Looks like a bit of wet stuff coming through Saturday arvo. Must be that negative Indian Ocean dipole at work.
- Trader
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4667
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 12:19 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Has thanked: 68 times
- Been thanked: 981 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
25-45mm last night in varying parts of Adelaide. Would suggest grounds without covers are called off by 5pm tonight.
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
-
Senor Moto Gadili
- Veteran
- Posts: 3645
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Has thanked: 206 times
- Been thanked: 540 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
That would be very sensible decision.Trader wrote:25-45mm last night in varying parts of Adelaide. Would suggest grounds without covers are called off by 5pm tonight.
-
whufc
- Coach
- Posts: 29218
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: BSR
- Location: Blakeview
- Has thanked: 6065 times
- Been thanked: 2933 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
How so...….Senor Moto Gadili wrote:That would be very sensible decision.Trader wrote:25-45mm last night in varying parts of Adelaide. Would suggest grounds without covers are called off by 5pm tonight.
What other way can I go sink 20 beers with the lads under the guise of playing a team sport and being healthy with the added bonus of the misses blessing.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
- heater31
- Moderator
- Posts: 16794
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
- Team: Sturt
- Location: the back blocks
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 1321 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
They have gone early with the call. If the ground doesn't have covers no need to show up tomorrow!
-
Senor Moto Gadili
- Veteran
- Posts: 3645
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Has thanked: 206 times
- Been thanked: 540 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Good call ATCA.heater31 wrote:They have gone early with the call. If the ground doesn't have covers no need to show up tomorrow!
- helicopterking
- Coach
- Posts: 5860
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:38 pm
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Massive advantage to the team that gotSenor Moto Gadili wrote:Good call ATCA.heater31 wrote:They have gone early with the call. If the ground doesn't have covers no need to show up tomorrow!
Away.
-
Catter4lyfe
- Mini-League
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:22 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Walkerville
- Been thanked: 8 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
As it should be. Clubs that invest the money and time (greater investment) for covers should get these advantages better than the days of half the games and cancelled so atca torpedos the entire round and clubs with covers get stiffed for all the effort.helicopterking wrote:Massive advantage to the team that gotSenor Moto Gadili wrote:Good call ATCA.heater31 wrote:They have gone early with the call. If the ground doesn't have covers no need to show up tomorrow!
Away.
- heater31
- Moderator
- Posts: 16794
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
- Team: Sturt
- Location: the back blocks
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 1321 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Hint hint to any club that forks out $$$$ for players but yet can't afford covers [emoji848]Catter4lyfe wrote:As it should be. Clubs that invest the money and time (greater investment) for covers should get these advantages better than the days of half the games and cancelled so atca torpedos the entire round and clubs with covers get stiffed for all the effort.helicopterking wrote:Massive advantage to the team that gotSenor Moto Gadili wrote:Good call ATCA.heater31 wrote:They have gone early with the call. If the ground doesn't have covers no need to show up tomorrow!
Away.
- Moe
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 1837
- Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:50 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Morphettville Park
- Location: On the Redlegs Bandwagon.
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
As asked on premier cricket forum, does ATCA rules allow a junior to play for a team in Premier, ATCA and SCJCA comp as well?
-
TheTranzlator
- Mini-League
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:28 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Carlton
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
- helicopterking
- Coach
- Posts: 5860
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:38 pm
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Probably the only deck to have a little bit in it judging by some scores this weekend.TheTranzlator wrote:18 wickets on day one up at Rostrevor!
Carnage
-
TheTranzlator
- Mini-League
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:28 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Carlton
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Having played there a few times over the years, the first couple of weeks tends to offer a bit for the bowlers, once there's been a few warms days to bake the pitch, it's back to low and slow.helicopterking wrote:Probably the only deck to have a little bit in it judging by some scores this weekend.TheTranzlator wrote:18 wickets on day one up at Rostrevor!
Carnage
-
bloods08
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4828
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Location: right here
- Been thanked: 14 times
- Contact:
Re: ATCA
Just looking for others thoughts on this.
In A2 Gepps Cross v Fulham, Gepps had bowled 79 overs by 5.48 and were ready to bowl their 80th, when Fulham declared meaning Gepps had to bat for 1 over. Previously if a team got bowled out or declared after 5.30, the opposition didn’t have to bat. In my opinion this should not be happening as it doesn’t encourage teams to get through their overs quickly. If Gepps had gone the other way and bowled slowly they get fined or lose points. What makes it worse is that one of the umpires (who has been umpiring in the league for years) didn’t know the by law had changed as he doesn’t have Facebook.
What Fulham did was within the rules, but I feel is not within the spirit of the game. Just looking for others opinions.
In A2 Gepps Cross v Fulham, Gepps had bowled 79 overs by 5.48 and were ready to bowl their 80th, when Fulham declared meaning Gepps had to bat for 1 over. Previously if a team got bowled out or declared after 5.30, the opposition didn’t have to bat. In my opinion this should not be happening as it doesn’t encourage teams to get through their overs quickly. If Gepps had gone the other way and bowled slowly they get fined or lose points. What makes it worse is that one of the umpires (who has been umpiring in the league for years) didn’t know the by law had changed as he doesn’t have Facebook.
What Fulham did was within the rules, but I feel is not within the spirit of the game. Just looking for others opinions.
Go you Redbacks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests
