The South Australian Political Landscape
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64108
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8792 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Huge boost for the SA economy with the AUKUS announcement. Brilliant news.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
whufc
- Coach
- Posts: 29217
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: BSR
- Location: Blakeview
- Has thanked: 6065 times
- Been thanked: 2933 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Great news for the stats but doesn't seem to be going down well with the Chinese.Booney wrote:Huge boost for the SA economy with the AUKUS announcement. Brilliant news.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
-
tigerpie
- Coach
- Posts: 5098
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Collingwood
- Has thanked: 651 times
- Been thanked: 529 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Jobs a plenty for engineering and construction.
Great news is we don't lose the skills in manufacturing.
Genuine pathway in engineering careers now, when it looked like it was all over in this state when Holden's shut.
Great news is we don't lose the skills in manufacturing.
Genuine pathway in engineering careers now, when it looked like it was all over in this state when Holden's shut.
- stan
- Coach
- Posts: 15668
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Team: Goodwood Saints
- Location: North Eastern Suburbs
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
The timing of new Aukus subs runs straight into the likely timing of there Taiwan plans.whufc wrote:Great news for the stats but doesn't seem to be going down well with the Chinese.Booney wrote:Huge boost for the SA economy with the AUKUS announcement. Brilliant news.
For the Chinese it really will be annoying having another Navy in the area to consider, albeit small, it's there.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
- Jimmy_041
- Coach
- Posts: 15661
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Port District
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 1407 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Not according to some - https://www.theguardian.com/australia-n ... sw-vic-qldBooney wrote:Huge boost for the SA economy with the AUKUS announcement. Brilliant news.
"Look" he's still mangling the English language "you know"..........
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
- DOC
- Coach
- Posts: 20257
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:15 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Has thanked: 934 times
- Been thanked: 2496 times
- Contact:
- Jimmy_041
- Coach
- Posts: 15661
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Port District
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 1407 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
It was in the updates which is that link but looks like they've taken it down since his NPC speechDOC wrote:Not sure this is the link you intended
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
- heater31
- Moderator
- Posts: 16794
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
- Team: Sturt
- Location: the back blocks
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 1321 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Broken election promises....new CBD Ambulance station will be built at Mile End!
https://indaily.com.au/news/2023/03/20/ ... for-ambos/
https://indaily.com.au/news/2023/03/20/ ... for-ambos/
-
shoe boy
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:58 am
- Team: South Adelaide
- Has thanked: 547 times
- Been thanked: 228 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Vickie Chapman, making comment of current liberal party. "male pale and stale" baaahaaa after 20 years of her!
-
mighty_tiger_79
- Coach
- Posts: 62511
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
- Team: Geelong
- Location: at the TAB
- Has thanked: 14199 times
- Been thanked: 5168 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
The explanation of Fixing Ramping was just 1/10 spin from Picton and Mali
Now it's #pillowgate, hopefully an audit of blankets are also done.
They never receive what they order daily....
Now it's #pillowgate, hopefully an audit of blankets are also done.
They never receive what they order daily....
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
-
Brodlach
- Coach
- Posts: 51615
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:18 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Colonel Light Gardens
- Location: Unley
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 5255 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Claimed they order 2000 pillows a month
How this is a government problem is beyond me
How this is a government problem is beyond me
July 11th 2012....
2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
- stan
- Coach
- Posts: 15668
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Team: Goodwood Saints
- Location: North Eastern Suburbs
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Bahahahaha we never said we would ramping.....hahahahhahaa
You only did about 100,000 times and probably have some posters around d thst day it.
Good grief, how did they win the last election...
You only did about 100,000 times and probably have some posters around d thst day it.
Good grief, how did they win the last election...
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
-
MW
- Coach
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 2804 times
- Been thanked: 2098 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
How bad do you need to be to lose to this mob hey?stan wrote:Bahahahaha we never said we would ramping.....hahahahhahaa
You only did about 100,000 times and probably have some posters around d thst day it.
Good grief, how did they win the last election...
- stan
- Coach
- Posts: 15668
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Team: Goodwood Saints
- Location: North Eastern Suburbs
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Hahah yeah no shit.MW wrote:How bad do you need to be to lose to this mob hey?stan wrote:Bahahahaha we never said we would ramping.....hahahahhahaa
You only did about 100,000 times and probably have some posters around d thst day it.
Good grief, how did they win the last election...
We are pretty ****** ad a state.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
- Psyber
- Coach
- Posts: 12247
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Hahndorf
- Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 405 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Drifting to the religiose right both federally and state is more the real issue for the Liberal Party. I've been a Liberal Party member since 1990, but I've been voting for independents the last few years.shoe boy wrote:Vickie Chapman, making comment of current liberal party. "male pale and stale" baaahaaa after 20 years of her!
Federally, there was Jamie Briggs in Mayo who turned many LP members towards voting for Rebekha Sharkey instead, and that disenchantment was boosted when they tried to slip in Downer's daughter from Interstate instead of running a genuinely local candidate.
Then statewise, there was the attempt to chuck out Dan Cregan by the religiose right wingers and replace him with one of their own. Result Dan went independent and got 75% of the vote.
So far I'm happy with both Albanese and Malinauskas...
I did even think of standing for Heysen at one time, and had Alexander Downer's backing, but my then wife was totally anti being a politician's wife. (She died in 2008. Now I'm married to a former SA politician's sister!)
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64108
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8792 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Psyber, do you think this is reflective of generational change that you're part of?Psyber wrote: Drifting to the religiose right both federally and state is more the real issue for the Liberal Party.
We've been an ageing population for some time and the "Boomers" are now in their 60'/70's/80's and as nature takes it's course this generally conservative generation is reducing in numbers. I'd also hasten a guess that the younger Boomers are being influenced in their thinking by their children and grand children, probably voting for things like Same Sex Marriage when they wouldn't have dreamt of it in their formative years.
Have your views softened / become more centric in recent years?
I think the Liberal party are tied to such "old fashioned" values that only the most right leaning feel engaged with them, the middle right I think has more empathy and liberal ( not liberal party ) thinking than ever before.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
jo172
- Veteran
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1248 times
- Been thanked: 750 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
While nothing is ever as good or as bad as it seems the Liberal party has a serious identity issue in terms of its core beliefs.
That is, main-stream conservatism is only appealing to people who have something to conserve. If you look at the rate of renters in what have traditionally been the bluest of blue liberal seats you will notice that they have expanded drastically over the last 3-4 decades. Fundamentally, if you don't have a significant ownership stake in the body polity a conservative approach is going to be less appealing. You have less to lose from a fundamental change in the system.
Further, in respect of some of the culture wars the orthodox "right" position would seem to be contrary to what would be put as a conservative position. Take for example anthropogenic climate change, a burkean view of climate change would suggest that we would take steps purely to mitigate risk (in that it might be real, it might not) particularly given the material risk would appear to be a significant change to the status quo.
Similarly, orthodox conservatism propounded primacy of the family unit outside of government obstruction. Most people accept that a traditional family unit can come in a significantly different way to which it might have in the 1950s by way of same-sex relationships. A burkean view would have been to embrace and strengthen the family unit, rather than to resist it.
That is, main-stream conservatism is only appealing to people who have something to conserve. If you look at the rate of renters in what have traditionally been the bluest of blue liberal seats you will notice that they have expanded drastically over the last 3-4 decades. Fundamentally, if you don't have a significant ownership stake in the body polity a conservative approach is going to be less appealing. You have less to lose from a fundamental change in the system.
Further, in respect of some of the culture wars the orthodox "right" position would seem to be contrary to what would be put as a conservative position. Take for example anthropogenic climate change, a burkean view of climate change would suggest that we would take steps purely to mitigate risk (in that it might be real, it might not) particularly given the material risk would appear to be a significant change to the status quo.
Similarly, orthodox conservatism propounded primacy of the family unit outside of government obstruction. Most people accept that a traditional family unit can come in a significantly different way to which it might have in the 1950s by way of same-sex relationships. A burkean view would have been to embrace and strengthen the family unit, rather than to resist it.
- Psyber
- Coach
- Posts: 12247
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Hahndorf
- Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 405 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
I've always called myself "the left wing of the Liberal Party".Booney wrote:Psyber, do you think this is reflective of generational change that you're part of?Psyber wrote: Drifting to the religiose right both federally and state is more the real issue for the Liberal Party.
We've been an ageing population for some time and the "Boomers" are now in their 60'/70's/80's and as nature takes it's course this generally conservative generation is reducing in numbers. I'd also hasten a guess that the younger Boomers are being influenced in their thinking by their children and grand children, probably voting for things like Same Sex Marriage when they wouldn't have dreamt of it in their formative years.
Have your views softened / become more centric in recent years?
I think the Liberal party are tied to such "old fashioned" values that only the most right leaning feel engaged with them, the middle right I think has more empathy and liberal ( not liberal party ) thinking than ever before.
Early in my voting life I voted for independents mostly, then I backed Gough Whitlam in twice, but they eventually turned me off and I voted Liberal the first time to chuck Gough out in 1975. I was a bit pro the Liberal Movement in SA but they withered away. I knew Steele Hall - his ex-wife was a friend of my then wife - the wife who died in 2008 - and we kept running into him at her place when he dropped in occasionally - and I went to school with Greg Crafter, and Terry Groom. Paul Keating pushed me towards the Liberals and that's when I joined the party. I've never been part of the right wing.
I was tempted to vote ALP several times under Kim Beasley but his replacement turned me off and he is now very right wing. I couldn't trust Bill Shorten but like Albanese so far. At the moment I'm backing independents again.
I've never been religious either - even though my parents met in the Salvation Army. My mother had an Anglican upbringing but I think my father just wanted to be in the band. He played Cornet, and Trombone.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
- Jimmy_041
- Coach
- Posts: 15661
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Port District
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 1407 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
Correct - people were saying the Liberals were irrelevant back in the days of Whitlam and then Hawke. I voted for Labor to get Hawke inPsyber wrote:I've always called myself "the left wing of the Liberal Party".Booney wrote:Psyber, do you think this is reflective of generational change that you're part of?Psyber wrote: Drifting to the religiose right both federally and state is more the real issue for the Liberal Party.
We've been an ageing population for some time and the "Boomers" are now in their 60'/70's/80's and as nature takes it's course this generally conservative generation is reducing in numbers. I'd also hasten a guess that the younger Boomers are being influenced in their thinking by their children and grand children, probably voting for things like Same Sex Marriage when they wouldn't have dreamt of it in their formative years.
Have your views softened / become more centric in recent years?
I think the Liberal party are tied to such "old fashioned" values that only the most right leaning feel engaged with them, the middle right I think has more empathy and liberal ( not liberal party ) thinking than ever before.
Early in my voting life I voted for independents mostly, then I backed Gough Whitlam in twice, but they eventually turned me off and I voted Liberal the first time to chuck Gough out in 1975. I was a bit pro the Liberal Movement in SA but they withered away. I knew Steele Hall - his ex-wife was a friend of my then wife - the wife who died in 2008 - and we kept running into him at her place when he dropped in occasionally - and I went to school with Greg Crafter, and Terry Groom. Paul Keating pushed me towards the Liberals and that's when I joined the party. I've never been part of the right wing.
I was tempted to vote ALP several times under Kim Beasley but his replacement turned me off and he is now very right wing. I couldn't trust Bill Shorten but like Albanese so far. At the moment I'm backing independents again.
I've never been religious either - even though my parents met in the Salvation Army. My mother had an Anglican upbringing but I think my father just wanted to be in the band. He played Cornet, and Trombone.
It didn't take long before both of them were gone. Whitlam had the biggest ar$ekicking in history until Keating came along. Beazley would have made a better PM than Krudd, Gillard, Albanese or Shorten all put together. Timing is cruel
Maybe people forget that the "Boomers" were once young as well. They just dont get caught up in the doomsday hysteria of today
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
-
Ronnie
- Reserves
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
- Contact:
Re: The South Australian Political Landscape
jo172 wrote:While nothing is ever as good or as bad as it seems the Liberal party has a serious identity issue in terms of its core beliefs.
That is, main-stream conservatism is only appealing to people who have something to conserve. If you look at the rate of renters in what have traditionally been the bluest of blue liberal seats you will notice that they have expanded drastically over the last 3-4 decades. Fundamentally, if you don't have a significant ownership stake in the body polity a conservative approach is going to be less appealing. You have less to lose from a fundamental change in the system.
Further, in respect of some of the culture wars the orthodox "right" position would seem to be contrary to what would be put as a conservative position. Take for example anthropogenic climate change, a burkean view of climate change would suggest that we would take steps purely to mitigate risk (in that it might be real, it might not) particularly given the material risk would appear to be a significant change to the status quo.
Similarly, orthodox conservatism propounded primacy of the family unit outside of government obstruction. Most people accept that a traditional family unit can come in a significantly different way to which it might have in the 1950s by way of same-sex relationships. A burkean view would have been to embrace and strengthen the family unit, rather than to resist it.
Maybe there is a conservative case for same sex marriage and some expound it, but the bigger issue to me is that
conservatives basically didn't even fight for the conservation of the traditional family unit, didn't even try. The breakdown of the family unit is, in my opinion, the biggest crisis in western societies like ours. To point out the bleeding obvious is to invite scorn and accusations of being judgemental but it's time to start being a bit honest about our situation.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests
