The South Australian Political Landscape

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.
Post Reply
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64108
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8792 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

Huge boost for the SA economy with the AUKUS announcement. Brilliant news.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by whufc »

Booney wrote:Huge boost for the SA economy with the AUKUS announcement. Brilliant news.
Great news for the stats but doesn't seem to be going down well with the Chinese.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by tigerpie »

Jobs a plenty for engineering and construction.
Great news is we don't lose the skills in manufacturing.
Genuine pathway in engineering careers now, when it looked like it was all over in this state when Holden's shut.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

whufc wrote:
Booney wrote:Huge boost for the SA economy with the AUKUS announcement. Brilliant news.
Great news for the stats but doesn't seem to be going down well with the Chinese.
The timing of new Aukus subs runs straight into the likely timing of there Taiwan plans.
For the Chinese it really will be annoying having another Navy in the area to consider, albeit small, it's there.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Booney wrote:Huge boost for the SA economy with the AUKUS announcement. Brilliant news.
Not according to some - https://www.theguardian.com/australia-n ... sw-vic-qld

"Look" he's still mangling the English language "you know"..........
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
DOC
Coach
Posts: 20257
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:15 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 934 times
Been thanked: 2496 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by DOC »

Not sure this is the link you intended
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

DOC wrote:Not sure this is the link you intended
It was in the updates which is that link but looks like they've taken it down since his NPC speech
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by heater31 »

Broken election promises....new CBD Ambulance station will be built at Mile End!

https://indaily.com.au/news/2023/03/20/ ... for-ambos/
shoe boy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:58 am
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 547 times
Been thanked: 228 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by shoe boy »

Vickie Chapman, making comment of current liberal party. "male pale and stale" baaahaaa after 20 years of her!
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62511
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5168 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

The explanation of Fixing Ramping was just 1/10 spin from Picton and Mali

Now it's #pillowgate, hopefully an audit of blankets are also done.
They never receive what they order daily....
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
Brodlach
Coach
Posts: 51615
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Colonel Light Gardens
Location: Unley
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 5255 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Brodlach »

Claimed they order 2000 pillows a month


How this is a government problem is beyond me
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods

2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

Bahahahaha we never said we would ramping.....hahahahhahaa

You only did about 100,000 times and probably have some posters around d thst day it.

Good grief, how did they win the last election...
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
MW
Coach
Posts: 14197
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 2804 times
Been thanked: 2098 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by MW »

stan wrote:Bahahahaha we never said we would ramping.....hahahahhahaa

You only did about 100,000 times and probably have some posters around d thst day it.

Good grief, how did they win the last election...
How bad do you need to be to lose to this mob hey?
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

MW wrote:
stan wrote:Bahahahaha we never said we would ramping.....hahahahhahaa

You only did about 100,000 times and probably have some posters around d thst day it.

Good grief, how did they win the last election...
How bad do you need to be to lose to this mob hey?
Hahah yeah no shit.

We are pretty ****** ad a state.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Hahndorf
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 405 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Psyber »

shoe boy wrote:Vickie Chapman, making comment of current liberal party. "male pale and stale" baaahaaa after 20 years of her!
Drifting to the religiose right both federally and state is more the real issue for the Liberal Party. I've been a Liberal Party member since 1990, but I've been voting for independents the last few years.

Federally, there was Jamie Briggs in Mayo who turned many LP members towards voting for Rebekha Sharkey instead, and that disenchantment was boosted when they tried to slip in Downer's daughter from Interstate instead of running a genuinely local candidate.

Then statewise, there was the attempt to chuck out Dan Cregan by the religiose right wingers and replace him with one of their own. Result Dan went independent and got 75% of the vote.

So far I'm happy with both Albanese and Malinauskas...

I did even think of standing for Heysen at one time, and had Alexander Downer's backing, but my then wife was totally anti being a politician's wife. (She died in 2008. Now I'm married to a former SA politician's sister!)
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64108
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8792 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

Psyber wrote: Drifting to the religiose right both federally and state is more the real issue for the Liberal Party.
Psyber, do you think this is reflective of generational change that you're part of?

We've been an ageing population for some time and the "Boomers" are now in their 60'/70's/80's and as nature takes it's course this generally conservative generation is reducing in numbers. I'd also hasten a guess that the younger Boomers are being influenced in their thinking by their children and grand children, probably voting for things like Same Sex Marriage when they wouldn't have dreamt of it in their formative years.

Have your views softened / become more centric in recent years?

I think the Liberal party are tied to such "old fashioned" values that only the most right leaning feel engaged with them, the middle right I think has more empathy and liberal ( not liberal party ) thinking than ever before.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Has thanked: 1248 times
Been thanked: 750 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by jo172 »

While nothing is ever as good or as bad as it seems the Liberal party has a serious identity issue in terms of its core beliefs.

That is, main-stream conservatism is only appealing to people who have something to conserve. If you look at the rate of renters in what have traditionally been the bluest of blue liberal seats you will notice that they have expanded drastically over the last 3-4 decades. Fundamentally, if you don't have a significant ownership stake in the body polity a conservative approach is going to be less appealing. You have less to lose from a fundamental change in the system.

Further, in respect of some of the culture wars the orthodox "right" position would seem to be contrary to what would be put as a conservative position. Take for example anthropogenic climate change, a burkean view of climate change would suggest that we would take steps purely to mitigate risk (in that it might be real, it might not) particularly given the material risk would appear to be a significant change to the status quo.

Similarly, orthodox conservatism propounded primacy of the family unit outside of government obstruction. Most people accept that a traditional family unit can come in a significantly different way to which it might have in the 1950s by way of same-sex relationships. A burkean view would have been to embrace and strengthen the family unit, rather than to resist it.
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Hahndorf
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 405 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Psyber »

Booney wrote:
Psyber wrote: Drifting to the religiose right both federally and state is more the real issue for the Liberal Party.
Psyber, do you think this is reflective of generational change that you're part of?

We've been an ageing population for some time and the "Boomers" are now in their 60'/70's/80's and as nature takes it's course this generally conservative generation is reducing in numbers. I'd also hasten a guess that the younger Boomers are being influenced in their thinking by their children and grand children, probably voting for things like Same Sex Marriage when they wouldn't have dreamt of it in their formative years.

Have your views softened / become more centric in recent years?

I think the Liberal party are tied to such "old fashioned" values that only the most right leaning feel engaged with them, the middle right I think has more empathy and liberal ( not liberal party ) thinking than ever before.
I've always called myself "the left wing of the Liberal Party".

Early in my voting life I voted for independents mostly, then I backed Gough Whitlam in twice, but they eventually turned me off and I voted Liberal the first time to chuck Gough out in 1975. I was a bit pro the Liberal Movement in SA but they withered away. I knew Steele Hall - his ex-wife was a friend of my then wife - the wife who died in 2008 - and we kept running into him at her place when he dropped in occasionally - and I went to school with Greg Crafter, and Terry Groom. Paul Keating pushed me towards the Liberals and that's when I joined the party. I've never been part of the right wing.

I was tempted to vote ALP several times under Kim Beasley but his replacement turned me off and he is now very right wing. I couldn't trust Bill Shorten but like Albanese so far. At the moment I'm backing independents again.

I've never been religious either - even though my parents met in the Salvation Army. My mother had an Anglican upbringing but I think my father just wanted to be in the band. He played Cornet, and Trombone.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Psyber wrote:
Booney wrote:
Psyber wrote: Drifting to the religiose right both federally and state is more the real issue for the Liberal Party.
Psyber, do you think this is reflective of generational change that you're part of?

We've been an ageing population for some time and the "Boomers" are now in their 60'/70's/80's and as nature takes it's course this generally conservative generation is reducing in numbers. I'd also hasten a guess that the younger Boomers are being influenced in their thinking by their children and grand children, probably voting for things like Same Sex Marriage when they wouldn't have dreamt of it in their formative years.

Have your views softened / become more centric in recent years?

I think the Liberal party are tied to such "old fashioned" values that only the most right leaning feel engaged with them, the middle right I think has more empathy and liberal ( not liberal party ) thinking than ever before.
I've always called myself "the left wing of the Liberal Party".

Early in my voting life I voted for independents mostly, then I backed Gough Whitlam in twice, but they eventually turned me off and I voted Liberal the first time to chuck Gough out in 1975. I was a bit pro the Liberal Movement in SA but they withered away. I knew Steele Hall - his ex-wife was a friend of my then wife - the wife who died in 2008 - and we kept running into him at her place when he dropped in occasionally - and I went to school with Greg Crafter, and Terry Groom. Paul Keating pushed me towards the Liberals and that's when I joined the party. I've never been part of the right wing.

I was tempted to vote ALP several times under Kim Beasley but his replacement turned me off and he is now very right wing. I couldn't trust Bill Shorten but like Albanese so far. At the moment I'm backing independents again.

I've never been religious either - even though my parents met in the Salvation Army. My mother had an Anglican upbringing but I think my father just wanted to be in the band. He played Cornet, and Trombone.
Correct - people were saying the Liberals were irrelevant back in the days of Whitlam and then Hawke. I voted for Labor to get Hawke in
It didn't take long before both of them were gone. Whitlam had the biggest ar$ekicking in history until Keating came along. Beazley would have made a better PM than Krudd, Gillard, Albanese or Shorten all put together. Timing is cruel

Maybe people forget that the "Boomers" were once young as well. They just dont get caught up in the doomsday hysteria of today
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Ronnie
Reserves
Posts: 824
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 95 times
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Ronnie »

jo172 wrote:While nothing is ever as good or as bad as it seems the Liberal party has a serious identity issue in terms of its core beliefs.

That is, main-stream conservatism is only appealing to people who have something to conserve. If you look at the rate of renters in what have traditionally been the bluest of blue liberal seats you will notice that they have expanded drastically over the last 3-4 decades. Fundamentally, if you don't have a significant ownership stake in the body polity a conservative approach is going to be less appealing. You have less to lose from a fundamental change in the system.

Further, in respect of some of the culture wars the orthodox "right" position would seem to be contrary to what would be put as a conservative position. Take for example anthropogenic climate change, a burkean view of climate change would suggest that we would take steps purely to mitigate risk (in that it might be real, it might not) particularly given the material risk would appear to be a significant change to the status quo.

Similarly, orthodox conservatism propounded primacy of the family unit outside of government obstruction. Most people accept that a traditional family unit can come in a significantly different way to which it might have in the 1950s by way of same-sex relationships. A burkean view would have been to embrace and strengthen the family unit, rather than to resist it.


Maybe there is a conservative case for same sex marriage and some expound it, but the bigger issue to me is that
conservatives basically didn't even fight for the conservation of the traditional family unit, didn't even try. The breakdown of the family unit is, in my opinion, the biggest crisis in western societies like ours. To point out the bleeding obvious is to invite scorn and accusations of being judgemental but it's time to start being a bit honest about our situation.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests