Interesting Hawthorn, Collingwood and Sydney are leading the argument against Essendon paying 7 months of Ryder and Monfires ( and the other suspended players ) wages.
In essence, Port could "keep" up to $600,000 from this years Total Player Payments ( TPP ) and use it towards next years. This could, given the right circumstances allow Port to turn a wage of say Aaron Young on $200,000 per year into a 3 year deal with $400,000 for a recruit.
Interesting that they had a say in our top up player situation and now want a say in this.
Booney wrote:Interesting Hawthorn, Collingwood and Sydney are leading the argument against Essendon paying 7 months of Ryder and Monfires ( and the other suspended players ) wages.
In essence, Port could "keep" up to $600,000 from this years Total Player Payments ( TPP ) and use it towards next years. This could, given the right circumstances allow Port to turn a wage of say Aaron Young on $200,000 per year into a 3 year deal with $400,000 for a recruit.
Interesting that they had a say in our top up player situation and now want a say in this.
I'd say "Tell 'em to get stuffed".
If the big 3 don't agree then it wont happen.. gotta keep them happy
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Booney wrote:Interesting Hawthorn, Collingwood and Sydney are leading the argument against Essendon paying 7 months of Ryder and Monfires ( and the other suspended players ) wages.
In essence, Port could "keep" up to $600,000 from this years Total Player Payments ( TPP ) and use it towards next years. This could, given the right circumstances allow Port to turn a wage of say Aaron Young on $200,000 per year into a 3 year deal with $400,000 for a recruit.
Interesting that they had a say in our top up player situation and now want a say in this.
I'd say "Tell 'em to get stuffed".
If the big 3 don't agree then it wont happen.. gotta keep them happy
Sydney dont drink Cola anymore. Hard times.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
So Port want 600k of salary cap concessions because two of their players were suspended drug cheats...riiiiight. I'm not surprised the other clubs are not supporting it
RustyCage wrote:Sydney complaining about salary cap concessions? Bwahaha!
Port asking for another handout? Bwhahahahaha
Couple of million in '03, nearly insolvent in '11, **** knows how much through the 90's when the SCG had nobody there, COLA, I think you're throwing stones out of your glass house with the handout gag.
RustyCage wrote:Sydney complaining about salary cap concessions? Bwahaha!
Port asking for another handout? Bwhahahahaha
Couple of million in '03, nearly insolvent in '11, **** knows how much through the 90's when the SCG had nobody there, COLA, I think you're throwing stones out of your glass house with the handout gag.
Even with this poor crowds, we still didn't need tarps... OH NO HE DIDNT
No problem with us paying all banned players salaries but have a big problem with clubs getting it removed from the salary cap. Especially Port who coerced Ryder into breaking a contract with us.
RustyCage wrote:Sydney complaining about salary cap concessions? Bwahaha!
Port asking for another handout? Bwhahahahaha
Couple of million in '03, nearly insolvent in '11, **** knows how much through the 90's when the SCG had nobody there, COLA, I think you're throwing stones out of your glass house with the handout gag.
Even with this poor crowds, we still didn't need tarps... OH NO HE DIDNT
For 20 years while you were "South Melbourne" in Sydney tarps might have been a great idea....really great idea.
RustyCage wrote:Sydney complaining about salary cap concessions? Bwahaha!
Port asking for another handout? Bwhahahahaha
Yes, we've got a couple of 10 year contracts we are drawing up. Now I'm just being silly, who'd do that?
Buddy did more in his first year at Sydney, than Ryder will do by the time buddy's contract is up...
Maybe, maybe not, maybe he'll be a burden too big for you to carry, maybe he'll consign you to paying $1m per year to a bloke sitting on the beach in Fiji. I guess time will tell, 10 years is a hell of a long time you know.
Jim05 wrote:No problem with us paying all banned players salaries but have a big problem with clubs getting it removed from the salary cap. Especially Port who coerced Ryder into breaking a contract with us.
No no, don't blame Port for Ryder getting out of the clinic.
