bennymacca wrote:Port and Sydney are both shit ok, lets just get that straight
Apricot coconut slice
Preheat oven to 180°C (160°C fan-forced). Grease and line a 20cm x 30cm slice pan. Lightly grease the baking paper. Pour boiling water over the apricots in a medium bowl; let stand while assembling the rest of the mixture. Sift flour into a large bowl and add coconut and sugar. Stir in butter, add eggs and milk. Fold through drained apricots. Spread the mixture into the pan. Bake 30 minutes or until browned and cooked when tested. Cool for 15 minutes in pan before turning onto a wire rack. In a small bowl, combine icing sugar and lemon juice. To pipe the icing over the slice, place the icing in a medium zip-lock bag. Snip off a very small corner of the bag and drizzle the icing over the slice.
bennymacca wrote:Port and Sydney are both shit ok, lets just get that straight
Apricot coconut slice
Preheat oven to 180°C (160°C fan-forced). Grease and line a 20cm x 30cm slice pan. Lightly grease the baking paper. Pour boiling water over the apricots in a medium bowl; let stand while assembling the rest of the mixture. Sift flour into a large bowl and add coconut and sugar. Stir in butter, add eggs and milk. Fold through drained apricots. Spread the mixture into the pan. Bake 30 minutes or until browned and cooked when tested. Cool for 15 minutes in pan before turning onto a wire rack. In a small bowl, combine icing sugar and lemon juice. To pipe the icing over the slice, place the icing in a medium zip-lock bag. Snip off a very small corner of the bag and drizzle the icing over the slice.
For the more advanced members there's enough time to knit a set of oven mitts before removing the pan.
Jim05 wrote:No problem with us paying all banned players salaries but have a big problem with clubs getting it removed from the salary cap. Especially Port who coerced Ryder into breaking a contract with us.
No no, don't blame Port for Ryder getting out of the clinic.
You took a guy who willingly took part in an injection regime and then want compo, fair enough
Jim05 wrote:No problem with us paying all banned players salaries but have a big problem with clubs getting it removed from the salary cap. Especially Port who coerced Ryder into breaking a contract with us.
No no, don't blame Port for Ryder getting out of the clinic.
You took a guy who willingly took part in an injection regime and then want compo, fair enough
We don't want compensation
1 - if the rules say you don't spend it this year you can spend it next year then we should be allowed to do just that. 2 - if it's not our fault he's suspended why should we pay him?
Jim05 wrote:No problem with us paying all banned players salaries but have a big problem with clubs getting it removed from the salary cap. Especially Port who coerced Ryder into breaking a contract with us.
No no, don't blame Port for Ryder getting out of the clinic.
You took a guy who willingly took part in an injection regime and then want compo, fair enough
We don't want compensation
1 - if the rules say you don't spend it this year you can spend it next year then we should be allowed to do just that. 2 - if it's not our fault he's suspended why should we pay him?
Because you knew there was a fair chance he would be suspended yet you still took the risk. What happened to buyer beware? If I was a club President there would be no way on earth I would of touched an Essendon player with that hanging over them, some clubs came out and said so straight away. The smart clubs can just wait until end of this year and take them for nothing
Booney wrote:[quote="Jim05"]No problem with us paying all banned players salaries but have a big problem with clubs getting it removed from the salary cap. Especially Port who coerced Ryder into breaking a contract with us.
No no, don't blame Port for Ryder getting out of the clinic.
You took a guy who willingly took part in an injection regime and then want compo, fair enough
We don't want compensation
1 - if the rules say you don't spend it this year you can spend it next year then we should be allowed to do just that. 2 - if it's not our fault he's suspended why should we pay him?
Because you knew there was a fair chance he would be suspended yet you still took the risk. What happened to buyer beware? If I was a club President there would be no way on earth I would of touched an Essendon player with that hanging over them, some clubs came out and said so straight away. The smart clubs can just wait until end of this year and take them for nothing [/quote] Well there sort of already starting with Freo targeting Hooker.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
stan wrote: Well there sort of already starting with Freo targeting Hooker.
Not sure he will leave but it's a pretty huge offer and would make you think twice. The only good thing is his contract is up at seasons end so he can't leave for nothing, we would get a first rounder for him so picks 1 and 2 here we come[emoji6]
stan wrote: Well there sort of already starting with Freo targeting Hooker.
Not sure he will leave but it's a pretty huge offer and would make you think twice. The only good thing is his contract is up at seasons end so he can't leave for nothing, we would get a first rounder for him so picks 1 and 2 here we come[emoji6]
Lol for Hooker. Maybe you should offer to pay half his salary to make sure he goes.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
stan wrote: Well there sort of already starting with Freo targeting Hooker.
Not sure he will leave but it's a pretty huge offer and would make you think twice. The only good thing is his contract is up at seasons end so he can't leave for nothing, we would get a first rounder for him so picks 1 and 2 here we come[emoji6]
Lol for Hooker. Maybe you should offer to pay half his salary to make sure he goes.
AFL pretty much has stated that if he took a huge deal like Freo are offering it would put him on a band 1 compo which would be straight after our first round pick. As we are a lock for pick 1 then pick 2 it would be for Cale. My understanding is he loves Melbourne though and doesn't want to go back to Perth, maybe the Hawks or someone else might throw a bit at him
stan wrote: Well there sort of already starting with Freo targeting Hooker.
Not sure he will leave but it's a pretty huge offer and would make you think twice. The only good thing is his contract is up at seasons end so he can't leave for nothing, we would get a first rounder for him so picks 1 and 2 here we come[emoji6]
Lol for Hooker. Maybe you should offer to pay half his salary to make sure he goes.
AFL pretty much has stated that if he took a huge deal like Freo are offering it would put him on a band 1 compo which would be straight after our first round pick. As we are a lock for pick 1 then pick 2 it would be for Cale. My understanding is he loves Melbourne though and doesn't want to go back to Perth, maybe the Hawks or someone else might throw a bit at him
Freo thinking they can get both hooker and the young forward from GWS in one hit
Pavlich sandilands and the old defender to retire would open salary cap space for them?
Port Adelaide NAB Challenge squad v Richmond Thursday 10 March, Etihad Stadium, 7.10pm AEDT
1. Travis Boak 3. Jake Neade 5. Matthew Broadbent 7. Brad Ebert 8. Hamish Hartlett 9. Robbie Gray 12. Jackson Trengove 13. Cameron O’Shea 15. Karl Amon 16. Oliver Wines 18. Jimmy Toumpas 19. Matthew White 20. Chad Wingard 22. Charlie Dixon 23. Matthew Lobbe 24. Jarman Impey 27. Alipate Carlile 28. Jay Schulz 29. Jasper Pittard 32. Dougal Howard 33. Darcy Byrne-Jones 36. Jack Hombsch 39. Justin Westhoff 40. Aaron Young 41. Brendon Ah Chee 42. Tom Jonas 46. Sam Gray
Into squad: Dixon, Wingard, Carlile, Howard Out of last team: Butcher, Polec
“Think of me like Yoda, but instead of being little and green I wear suits and I'm awesome. I'm your bro—I'm Broda!”
HOGG Shield 2015 Division I Premiers. HOGG Shield 2017 Premier League Premiers.
JK wrote: For the more advanced members there's enough time to knit a set of oven mitts before removing the pan.
My grandma came over the other day and gave my 4 month old a crows blanket she has knitted.
Sometimes stereotypes are there because they have an element of truth.
Well, most stereotypes begin as an observation of reality. It becomes a problem with it's not representational or out dated.
But I'm, still struggling with why it seems to be used as an insult. Apricot slice is great and I wish I had some now. Knitting is going out of fashion but that's probably because we can buy clothes from China for 50 cents. The people you're talking about did just happen to grow up in an era where they didn't have a lot because most of the world had spent their resources trying to stop Hitler and Hirohito taking over the world.
JK wrote: For the more advanced members there's enough time to knit a set of oven mitts before removing the pan.
My grandma came over the other day and gave my 4 month old a crows blanket she has knitted.
Sometimes stereotypes are there because they have an element of truth.
Well, most stereotypes begin as an observation of reality. It becomes a problem with it's not representational or out dated.
But I'm, still struggling with why it seems to be used as an insult. Apricot slice is great and I wish I had some now. Knitting is going out of fashion but that's probably because we can buy clothes from China for 50 cents. The people you're talking about did just happen to grow up in an era where they didn't have a lot because most of the world had spent their resources trying to stop Hitler and Hirohito taking over the world.
I wonder if in 50 years we'll be sating the same about Trump.
I blame Port for this.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
