AdFL Tribunal Listing

Fools Gold · Post by **Fools Gold** » Thu Jun 30, 2022 3:59 pm

2 weeks for attempted striking??

Old_mate21 · Post by **Old_mate21** » Thu Jun 30, 2022 4:05 pm

Was it a red card during the game?

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Thu Jun 30, 2022 9:42 pm

Fools Gold wrote:2 weeks for attempted striking??

53:44

https://www.dartfish.tv/Player?CR=p1320 ... 23m7202381

Lucky they didn't refer to potential to cause injury like they do with dangerous tackles.

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Thu Jun 30, 2022 9:44 pm

MoP wrote: No surprise to see Haysman (SPOC) get 4 weeks. Interesting, though, to see that Wisman (Glenunga) got suspended when he didn't even give away a free kick, but Gibson (SPOC) got sent off for his tackle, but didn't get anything.

More confusion/mixed messaging from HQ. Based on what I saw, I think Wisman deserved his suspension, but thought Gibson may have got one, too.

HQ have repeatedly said they don’t sift through the 45 match videos a week.

My understanding is SPOC complained about Wisemen. Did Glenunga complain about Gibson ? If they did and it is as you say he might’ve got one.

I don’t think there’s any confusion at all except your understanding of how incidents are brought to Leagues attention because if they are, like or not, HQ are normnally onto it.

What time is the tackle you are talkng about ?

MoP · Post by **MoP** » Thu Jun 30, 2022 9:59 pm

The Bedge wrote:
MoP wrote: No surprise to see Haysman (SPOC) get 4 weeks. Interesting, though, to see that Wisman (Glenunga) got suspended when he didn't even give away a free kick, but Gibson (SPOC) got sent off for his tackle, but didn't get anything.

More confusion/mixed messaging from HQ. Based on what I saw, I think Wisman deserved his suspension, but thought Gibson may have got one, too.
HQ have repeatedly said they don’t sift through the 45 match videos a week.

My understanding is SPOC complained about Wisemen. Did Glenunga complain about Gibson ? If they did and it is as you say he might’ve got one.

I don’t think there’s any confusion at all except your understanding of how incidents are brought to Leagues attention because if they are, like or not, HQ are normnally onto it.

What time is the tackle you are talkng about ?

I presumed 'cos the tribunal report said MRP, not Investigation, it was instigated by the league. It wouldn't surprise me if SPOC's President complained to HQ. Wisman's incident was 5:20 and Gibson's 23:20, from memory.

jo172 · Post by **jo172** » Fri Jul 01, 2022 8:12 am

Honestly didn't see a whole lot in either of those relative to the Haysman one (which was a shocker)

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Thu Jul 07, 2022 11:47 am

Early one today

scottroo · Post by **scottroo** » Thu Jul 07, 2022 12:26 pm

Couple of big striking penalties there. Is whelan related to the coach?

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Thu Jul 07, 2022 1:14 pm

scottroo wrote:Is whelan related to the coach?

Son

MoP · Post by **MoP** » Thu Jul 07, 2022 1:19 pm

Brodlach wrote:Early one today

Can someone post a copy of this week's tribunal, please?

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Thu Jul 07, 2022 1:44 pm

At least you’re consistent

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:49 am

photo host

Trader · Post by **Trader** » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:04 pm

Fair effort to go from 7 weeks to none!
Well done to the Woody South defence team!

I wonder if the league will apologise to the lad for putting his name out there for a week as guilty to a fairly serious charge.

bloods08 · Post by **bloods08** » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:07 pm

Trader wrote:Fair effort to go from 7 weeks to none!
Well done to the Woody South defence team!

I wonder if the league will apologise to the lad for putting his name out there for a week as guilty to a fairly serious charge.

Looks like the appeal was dismissed to me.

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:30 pm

bloods08 wrote:
Trader wrote:Fair effort to go from 7 weeks to none!
Well done to the Woody South defence team!

I wonder if the league will apologise to the lad for putting his name out there for a week as guilty to a fairly serious charge.
Looks like the appeal was dismissed to me.

That's how I read it?

MoP · Post by **MoP** » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:40 pm

The Bedge wrote:
bloods08 wrote:
Trader wrote:Fair effort to go from 7 weeks to none!
Well done to the Woody South defence team!

I wonder if the league will apologise to the lad for putting his name out there for a week as guilty to a fairly serious charge.
Looks like the appeal was dismissed to me.
That's how I read it?

Depends how you interpret it. Was the appeal dismissed, so he still copped his suspension (it does still show 7 + 1), or was the charge dismissed at appeal?

Down the Hill · Post by **Down the Hill** » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:50 pm

Legal definition of Appeal Dismissed: "Appeal dismissed means that the court will decide in favour of the respondent or the party against whom the appeal is brought".

The applicant was WS/Player and the respondent was the League/Tribunal. So the League/Tribunal won.

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:52 pm

Tribunal is like the Casino - house always wins.

Trader · Post by **Trader** » Thu Jul 14, 2022 1:04 pm

The Bedge wrote:Tribunal is like the Casino - house always wins.

Haha, thanks lads, appreciate the clarification.

Surprised he only got a suspended week added. Basically a free appeal!

Down the Hill · Post by **Down the Hill** » Thu Jul 14, 2022 1:12 pm

Trader wrote:
The Bedge wrote:Tribunal is like the Casino - house always wins.
Haha, thanks lads, appreciate the clarification.

Surprised he only got a suspended week added. Basically a free appeal!

Trader - I think the Boss keeps half an eye on SA Footy so I'm sure he accept this as your apology.

AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing

Who is online