sturt v glenelg
-
stampy
- Coach
- Posts: 9170
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Christies Beach
- Location: at church asking for divine intervention
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 394 times
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
MST wrote:It's a bit hard for Jimbob being so far away and not having seen them live every week LBT.
If the Blues play to their potential tomorrow, with the same cohesion, toughness and run they have shown over the last few weeks, the Bays won't get near them.
Enough faith for you?
geez thats an arrogant statement if ever i have seen one, you guys aint a central district yet, and yes i know you guys have knocked 'em off but to say we wont get near you is ludicrous
Go The Tiges!!!
- Hondo
- Coach
- Posts: 7927
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Location: Glandore, Adelaide
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
In between signatures .....
- am Bays
- Coach
- Posts: 20534
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Location: The back bar at Lennies
- Has thanked: 192 times
- Been thanked: 2324 times
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
You're not wrong Hondo, tomorrow night will be compulsory viewing to see the posts of the victors and vanquished...
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
- Pseudo
- Coach
- Posts: 12499
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Marion
- Location: enculez-vous
- Been thanked: 1712 times
- Contact:
-
smithy
Re: sturt v glenelg
hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW

-
bayman
- Coach
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Plympton
- Location: home
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
smithy wrote:hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
that looks like mundine
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
-
stampy
- Coach
- Posts: 9170
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Christies Beach
- Location: at church asking for divine intervention
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 394 times
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
nice pic smithy
oh and by the way..............GO THE BAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sprechen zie deutsch?
oh and by the way..............GO THE BAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sprechen zie deutsch?
Go The Tiges!!!
- therisingblues
- Coach
- Posts: 6190
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Carlton
- Team: Hope Valley
- Location: Fukuoka
- Has thanked: 369 times
- Been thanked: 514 times
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
Too right Hondo. I have never seen a group of supporters so sensitive about the use of the term "danger game" before. Perhaps we need to put forward a motion to replace the use of this phrase with the more politically correct, "game that we may lose if we don't apply ourselves one hundred percent" when referring to appropriate games that Glenelg are involved in. A little wordy, I know, but look at the pages of web space that will be saved from the reaction!
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
-
Jimmy
- Coach
- Posts: 6348
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: sturt v glenelg
therisingblues wrote:hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
Too right Hondo. I have never seen a group of supporters so sensitive about the use of the term "danger game" before. Perhaps we need to put forward a motion to replace the use of this phrase with the more politically correct, "game that we may lose if we don't apply ourselves one hundred percent" when referring to appropriate games that Glenelg are involved in. A little wordy, I know, but look at the pages of web space that will be saved from the reaction!
danger game refers to us fans giving the bays the respect they deserve. seems tho that their fans dont care and are just writing their team off, some anyway.
i cant wait till tomorrow avo, win lose or draw, going to be an entertaining day on the threads
did i mention....DANGER GAME!!!!!!!!
Carn the blues!!!!!
- Blue Boy
- Veteran
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Flagstaff Hill
- Location: Any where between here and there
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
I am nervous about tomorrow - the bays seem to be hittin there straps and who knows what sort of state we will rock up in.
If we win I will be super stoked - carn you blue boys !!!
If we win I will be super stoked - carn you blue boys !!!
It is what it is !!!
-
Jimmy
- Coach
- Posts: 6348
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: sturt v glenelg
bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game 
i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????
i wonder when he realised his gaff??
i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.
anyway, go you blues boys!!!!
i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????
i wonder when he realised his gaff??
i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.
anyway, go you blues boys!!!!
Carn the blues!!!!!
- Blue Boy
- Veteran
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Flagstaff Hill
- Location: Any where between here and there
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
Jimmy wrote:bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game
i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????
i wonder when he realised his gaff??![]()
i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.
anyway, go you blues boys!!!!
Probably have to see Chappy playin down back - his rebound will be important.
A contest @ CHF will be so important - lets maybe see another rabbit here from Rick. Hopefully its not macca as I rekon he has been very solid @ CHB - as I have had said earlier thats where he plays his best footy.
It is what it is !!!
-
sturt1
- Under 18s
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
Blue Boy wrote:Jimmy wrote:bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game
i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????
i wonder when he realised his gaff??![]()
i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.
anyway, go you blues boys!!!!
Probably have to see Chappy playin down back - his rebound will be important.
A contest @ CHF will be so important - lets maybe see another rabbit here from Rick. Hopefully its not macca as I rekon he has been very solid @ CHB - as I have had said earlier thats where he plays his best footy.
Blue Boy apart from Luke Button I really dont know if we have another choice. Chaplin is a defender full stop and will give us alot of poise in the backlines. IMO Button has been exceptional since coming back into the side as a defender since he was dropped earlier in the season. You know you will get a real contest from Macca if he plays at CHF.
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
- godoubleblues
- Coach
- Posts: 6063
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:16 am
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Millicent
- Location: Littlehampton
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
sturt1 wrote:Blue Boy wrote:Jimmy wrote:bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game
i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????
i wonder when he realised his gaff??![]()
i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.
anyway, go you blues boys!!!!
Probably have to see Chappy playin down back - his rebound will be important.
A contest @ CHF will be so important - lets maybe see another rabbit here from Rick. Hopefully its not macca as I rekon he has been very solid @ CHB - as I have had said earlier thats where he plays his best footy.
Blue Boy apart from Luke Button I really dont know if we have another choice. Chaplin is a defender full stop and will give us alot of poise in the backlines. IMO Button has been exceptional since coming back into the side as a defender since he was dropped earlier in the season. You know you will get a real contest from Macca if he plays at CHF.
I dont mind Macca at CHF, he has played there before and kicked bags of three and four goals, he will provide a contest but I do agree he has settled well at CHB this year, but I am sure he will do well wherever Rick plays him
- Dutchy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 47494
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Location, Location
- Has thanked: 2937 times
- Been thanked: 4842 times
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
MST wrote:Dutchy wrote:MST - one big difference I didnt mention Craig Evans as a key player tomorrow, you mentioned Mahoney
OMG Dutchy, is there no limit to your obvious stupidity??????
The discussion started concerning Sturt 'relying' on AFL players (pfffftt).
I countered LBT's paper thin assertion with some facts.
I THEN mentioned a couple of AFL players in the GFC side. At no time did I use the words 'key player'.
Is this clear enough for you meathead?
Truth be known, players like Fisher, Backwell, Moore and Kane worry me far more than a Josh Mahoney would.
May I suggest you build a bridge...........and get over it.
Real classy MST, your words speak for themselves and your character....
-
MST
- Under 18s
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
- Contact:
Re: sturt v glenelg
Dutchy wrote:MST wrote:Dutchy wrote:MST - one big difference I didnt mention Craig Evans as a key player tomorrow, you mentioned Mahoney
OMG Dutchy, is there no limit to your obvious stupidity??????
The discussion started concerning Sturt 'relying' on AFL players (pfffftt).
I countered LBT's paper thin assertion with some facts.
I THEN mentioned a couple of AFL players in the GFC side. At no time did I use the words 'key player'.
Is this clear enough for you meathead?
Truth be known, players like Fisher, Backwell, Moore and Kane worry me far more than a Josh Mahoney would.
May I suggest you build a bridge...........and get over it.
Real classy MST, your words speak for themselves and your character....
Yeah Dutchman, I am a real asshole.
You'll find if you look back over some of your posts that it is you who sometimes lacks class.
The use of the word 'meathead' was perhaps a tad harsh and for that I apologise, but for God's sake man, stop putting words in my mouth and trying to make a big deal out of something that isn't.
Enjoy today and may the best side win.
-
youngster
- Rookie
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:54 am
- Team: Sturt
- Location: At the bar
- Contact:
- Jar Man Out
- Under 18s
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:27 am
- Team: Central District
Re: sturt v glenelg
MST wrote:Dutchy wrote:MST wrote:Dutchy wrote:MST - one big difference I didnt mention Craig Evans as a key player tomorrow, you mentioned Mahoney
OMG Dutchy, is there no limit to your obvious stupidity??????
The discussion started concerning Sturt 'relying' on AFL players (pfffftt).
I countered LBT's paper thin assertion with some facts.
I THEN mentioned a couple of AFL players in the GFC side. At no time did I use the words 'key player'.
Is this clear enough for you meathead?
Truth be known, players like Fisher, Backwell, Moore and Kane worry me far more than a Josh Mahoney would.
May I suggest you build a bridge...........and get over it.
Real classy MST, your words speak for themselves and your character....
Yeah Dutchman, I am a real asshole.
You'll find if you look back over some of your posts that it is you who sometimes lacks class.
The use of the word 'meathead' was perhaps a tad harsh and for that I apologise, but for God's sake man, stop putting words in my mouth and trying to make a big deal out of something that isn't.
Enjoy today and may the best side win.
Ordinary form MST. what an asshole.
Centrals 16.11 107 North 5.12 42 the dynasty continues .
- ElizabethVCRThief
- Rookie
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:01 am
- Location: Cash Converters
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 246 guests

