sturt v glenelg

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
User avatar
LBT
League - Best 21
Posts: 2099
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:39 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Brighton District & OS
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by LBT »

Oh calling people meathead now. you're all class
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 394 times
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by stampy »

MST wrote:It's a bit hard for Jimbob being so far away and not having seen them live every week LBT.

If the Blues play to their potential tomorrow, with the same cohesion, toughness and run they have shown over the last few weeks, the Bays won't get near them.

Enough faith for you?


geez thats an arrogant statement if ever i have seen one, you guys aint a central district yet, and yes i know you guys have knocked 'em off but to say we wont get near you is ludicrous
Go The Tiges!!!
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by Hondo »

Geez!

It's on!

We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....

It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW :D
In between signatures .....
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20534
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 2324 times
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by am Bays »

hondo71 wrote:Geez!

It's on!

We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....

It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW :D


You're not wrong Hondo, tomorrow night will be compulsory viewing to see the posts of the victors and vanquished...
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12499
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by Pseudo »

hondo71 wrote:Geez!

It's on!

Image
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
smithy

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by smithy »

hondo71 wrote:Geez!

It's on!

We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....

It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW :D


Image
bayman
Coach
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Plympton
Location: home
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by bayman »

smithy wrote:
hondo71 wrote:Geez!

It's on!

We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....

It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW :D


Image



that looks like mundine :shock:
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 394 times
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by stampy »

nice pic smithy :D

oh and by the way..............GO THE BAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sprechen zie deutsch?
Go The Tiges!!!
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by therisingblues »

hondo71 wrote:Geez!

It's on!

We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....

It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW :D

Too right Hondo. I have never seen a group of supporters so sensitive about the use of the term "danger game" before. Perhaps we need to put forward a motion to replace the use of this phrase with the more politically correct, "game that we may lose if we don't apply ourselves one hundred percent" when referring to appropriate games that Glenelg are involved in. A little wordy, I know, but look at the pages of web space that will be saved from the reaction!
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
Jimmy
Coach
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: St Kilda
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by Jimmy »

therisingblues wrote:
hondo71 wrote:Geez!

It's on!

We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....

It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW :D

Too right Hondo. I have never seen a group of supporters so sensitive about the use of the term "danger game" before. Perhaps we need to put forward a motion to replace the use of this phrase with the more politically correct, "game that we may lose if we don't apply ourselves one hundred percent" when referring to appropriate games that Glenelg are involved in. A little wordy, I know, but look at the pages of web space that will be saved from the reaction!


danger game refers to us fans giving the bays the respect they deserve. seems tho that their fans dont care and are just writing their team off, some anyway.

i cant wait till tomorrow avo, win lose or draw, going to be an entertaining day on the threads :D

did i mention....DANGER GAME!!!!!!!!
Carn the blues!!!!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Flagstaff Hill
Location: Any where between here and there
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by Blue Boy »

I am nervous about tomorrow - the bays seem to be hittin there straps and who knows what sort of state we will rock up in.

If we win I will be super stoked - carn you blue boys !!!
It is what it is !!!
Jimmy
Coach
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: St Kilda
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by Jimmy »

bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game ;)

i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????

i wonder when he realised his gaff?? :?

i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.

anyway, go you blues boys!!!! :lol:
Carn the blues!!!!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Flagstaff Hill
Location: Any where between here and there
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by Blue Boy »

Jimmy wrote:bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game ;)

i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????

i wonder when he realised his gaff?? :?

i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.

anyway, go you blues boys!!!! :lol:


Probably have to see Chappy playin down back - his rebound will be important.

A contest @ CHF will be so important - lets maybe see another rabbit here from Rick. Hopefully its not macca as I rekon he has been very solid @ CHB - as I have had said earlier thats where he plays his best footy.
It is what it is !!!
sturt1
Under 18s
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by sturt1 »

Blue Boy wrote:
Jimmy wrote:bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game ;)

i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????

i wonder when he realised his gaff?? :?

i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.

anyway, go you blues boys!!!! :lol:


Probably have to see Chappy playin down back - his rebound will be important.

A contest @ CHF will be so important - lets maybe see another rabbit here from Rick. Hopefully its not macca as I rekon he has been very solid @ CHB - as I have had said earlier thats where he plays his best footy.


Blue Boy apart from Luke Button I really dont know if we have another choice. Chaplin is a defender full stop and will give us alot of poise in the backlines. IMO Button has been exceptional since coming back into the side as a defender since he was dropped earlier in the season. You know you will get a real contest from Macca if he plays at CHF.
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
User avatar
godoubleblues
Coach
Posts: 6063
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:16 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Millicent
Location: Littlehampton
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by godoubleblues »

sturt1 wrote:
Blue Boy wrote:
Jimmy wrote:bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game ;)

i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????

i wonder when he realised his gaff?? :?

i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.

anyway, go you blues boys!!!! :lol:


Probably have to see Chappy playin down back - his rebound will be important.

A contest @ CHF will be so important - lets maybe see another rabbit here from Rick. Hopefully its not macca as I rekon he has been very solid @ CHB - as I have had said earlier thats where he plays his best footy.


Blue Boy apart from Luke Button I really dont know if we have another choice. Chaplin is a defender full stop and will give us alot of poise in the backlines. IMO Button has been exceptional since coming back into the side as a defender since he was dropped earlier in the season. You know you will get a real contest from Macca if he plays at CHF.


I dont mind Macca at CHF, he has played there before and kicked bags of three and four goals, he will provide a contest but I do agree he has settled well at CHB this year, but I am sure he will do well wherever Rick plays him
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47494
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4842 times
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by Dutchy »

MST wrote:
Dutchy wrote:MST - one big difference I didnt mention Craig Evans as a key player tomorrow, you mentioned Mahoney


OMG Dutchy, is there no limit to your obvious stupidity??????

The discussion started concerning Sturt 'relying' on AFL players (pfffftt).

I countered LBT's paper thin assertion with some facts.

I THEN mentioned a couple of AFL players in the GFC side. At no time did I use the words 'key player'.

Is this clear enough for you meathead?

Truth be known, players like Fisher, Backwell, Moore and Kane worry me far more than a Josh Mahoney would.

May I suggest you build a bridge...........and get over it.


Real classy MST, your words speak for themselves and your character....
MST
Under 18s
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Team: Sturt
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by MST »

Dutchy wrote:
MST wrote:
Dutchy wrote:MST - one big difference I didnt mention Craig Evans as a key player tomorrow, you mentioned Mahoney


OMG Dutchy, is there no limit to your obvious stupidity??????

The discussion started concerning Sturt 'relying' on AFL players (pfffftt).

I countered LBT's paper thin assertion with some facts.

I THEN mentioned a couple of AFL players in the GFC side. At no time did I use the words 'key player'.

Is this clear enough for you meathead?

Truth be known, players like Fisher, Backwell, Moore and Kane worry me far more than a Josh Mahoney would.

May I suggest you build a bridge...........and get over it.


Real classy MST, your words speak for themselves and your character....


Yeah Dutchman, I am a real asshole.

You'll find if you look back over some of your posts that it is you who sometimes lacks class.

The use of the word 'meathead' was perhaps a tad harsh and for that I apologise, but for God's sake man, stop putting words in my mouth and trying to make a big deal out of something that isn't.

Enjoy today and may the best side win.
youngster
Rookie
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:54 am
Team: Sturt
Location: At the bar
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by youngster »

Now now children, fight nicely please... :axe:
User avatar
Jar Man Out
Under 18s
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:27 am
Team: Central District

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by Jar Man Out »

MST wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
MST wrote:
Dutchy wrote:MST - one big difference I didnt mention Craig Evans as a key player tomorrow, you mentioned Mahoney


OMG Dutchy, is there no limit to your obvious stupidity??????

The discussion started concerning Sturt 'relying' on AFL players (pfffftt).

I countered LBT's paper thin assertion with some facts.

I THEN mentioned a couple of AFL players in the GFC side. At no time did I use the words 'key player'.

Is this clear enough for you meathead?

Truth be known, players like Fisher, Backwell, Moore and Kane worry me far more than a Josh Mahoney would.

May I suggest you build a bridge...........and get over it.


Real classy MST, your words speak for themselves and your character....


Yeah Dutchman, I am a real asshole.

You'll find if you look back over some of your posts that it is you who sometimes lacks class.

The use of the word 'meathead' was perhaps a tad harsh and for that I apologise, but for God's sake man, stop putting words in my mouth and trying to make a big deal out of something that isn't.

Enjoy today and may the best side win.


Ordinary form MST. what an asshole.
Centrals 16.11 107 North 5.12 42 the dynasty continues .
User avatar
ElizabethVCRThief
Rookie
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:01 am
Location: Cash Converters
Contact:

Re: sturt v glenelg

Post by ElizabethVCRThief »

How many assholes we got on this ship anyway?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 231 guests