APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
- Footy Chick
- Moderator
- Posts: 27021
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:44 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Location: anywhere I want to be...
- Has thanked: 1794 times
- Been thanked: 2249 times
- Contact:
APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
New rules set by the CFB in relation to how many players can be recruited from the one club - Discuss.
10.3A - Transfers between Clubs – Limit
10.3A.1 Subject to Regulations 10.3A.2 and 10.3A.3, an Affiliated League Club may refuse a Clearance for a player if three (3) players have previously transferred from the Club with which the player is currently registered (‘the Current Club’) to the same Affiliated League Club (‘the Transferring Club’) in the current season.
10.3A.2 The Current Club and the Transferring Club may, if both Clubs agree, determine that Regulation 10.3A.1 will not apply.
10.3A.3 A player who has previously played 25 or more matches for the Transferring Club shall not be included for the purposes of Regulation 10.3A.
10.3A - Transfers between Clubs – Limit
10.3A.1 Subject to Regulations 10.3A.2 and 10.3A.3, an Affiliated League Club may refuse a Clearance for a player if three (3) players have previously transferred from the Club with which the player is currently registered (‘the Current Club’) to the same Affiliated League Club (‘the Transferring Club’) in the current season.
10.3A.2 The Current Club and the Transferring Club may, if both Clubs agree, determine that Regulation 10.3A.1 will not apply.
10.3A.3 A player who has previously played 25 or more matches for the Transferring Club shall not be included for the purposes of Regulation 10.3A.
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
- Footy Chick
- Moderator
- Posts: 27021
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:44 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Location: anywhere I want to be...
- Has thanked: 1794 times
- Been thanked: 2249 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
The rest of the APPS rules, for those playing at home.
- Attachments
-
- APPENDIX 4 only of July 2014 Rules Regs .pdf
- (331.28 KiB) Downloaded 443 times
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
-
RooShootOhh
- Under 16s
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:35 am
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Waikerie
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
So basically, you cant take (unless they want you to have) 4 players from one club (not including players returning to a previous club where they played 25+ games) in one year.
Not a huge change to what prob already happens as it stands. using 3 point players as the standard, if your Ammo club had its full 15 points to fill, thats 4/5 players from one place, I wouldn't think that would happen all too often. Most country clubs dont have the full allocation of 15 so this could represent its full recruitment for the season, again it wouldn't happen too often.
I think the rule was intended to stop a max exedous from leaving one club, but often, like Kilburn this year, its players spread out far and wide, therefor the rule doesnt work...
What it does potentially do is stop blokes who just want to play with their mates at one club, but again, this would be rare and would only matter if the clubs tried to block it.
its ok that they have written it there, not sure it will actually come into play all that often!
Not a huge change to what prob already happens as it stands. using 3 point players as the standard, if your Ammo club had its full 15 points to fill, thats 4/5 players from one place, I wouldn't think that would happen all too often. Most country clubs dont have the full allocation of 15 so this could represent its full recruitment for the season, again it wouldn't happen too often.
I think the rule was intended to stop a max exedous from leaving one club, but often, like Kilburn this year, its players spread out far and wide, therefor the rule doesnt work...
What it does potentially do is stop blokes who just want to play with their mates at one club, but again, this would be rare and would only matter if the clubs tried to block it.
its ok that they have written it there, not sure it will actually come into play all that often!
-
jo172
- Veteran
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1248 times
- Been thanked: 750 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
This isn't as much an "APPS rule" as it is a Community Football Board Regulation.
You can see what they're trying to do, but I think it's a bit of hitting a nail with a sledgehammer. Enabling Clubs (if they wanted to be wankers about it) stopping 3 C Graders from joining another Club's D Grade is a bit over the top.
It's also particularly concerning that whether I would have a right of appeal (as a player) from my clearance being rejected under this provision is unclear.
In any event, on the face of it it's also quite likely an unlawful restraint of trade (not that running such a case would be economically viable).
You can see what they're trying to do, but I think it's a bit of hitting a nail with a sledgehammer. Enabling Clubs (if they wanted to be wankers about it) stopping 3 C Graders from joining another Club's D Grade is a bit over the top.
It's also particularly concerning that whether I would have a right of appeal (as a player) from my clearance being rejected under this provision is unclear.
In any event, on the face of it it's also quite likely an unlawful restraint of trade (not that running such a case would be economically viable).
-
jo172
- Veteran
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1248 times
- Been thanked: 750 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
I also note that a simple way to avoid this rule is to go to a Third Club.
That is, if I want to transfer from SPOC to Uni, but 3 people this season already have and SPOC doesn't want to let anyone else transfer, there's nothing in the new 10.3A to prevent me clearing from SPOC to Walkerville to Uni as Walkerville would become the "current club"
That is, if I want to transfer from SPOC to Uni, but 3 people this season already have and SPOC doesn't want to let anyone else transfer, there's nothing in the new 10.3A to prevent me clearing from SPOC to Walkerville to Uni as Walkerville would become the "current club"
- heater31
- Moderator
- Posts: 16794
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
- Team: Sturt
- Location: the back blocks
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 1321 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
jo172 wrote:I also note that a simple way to avoid this rule is to go to a Third Club.
That is, if I want to transfer from SPOC to Uni, but 3 people this season already have and SPOC doesn't want to let anyone else transfer, there's nothing in the new 10.3A to prevent me clearing from SPOC to Walkerville to Uni as Walkerville would become the "current club"
Isn't there a rule that if a player wants to move club's a 2nd time in the same season the the original club must also give a clearance.....
-
jo172
- Veteran
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1248 times
- Been thanked: 750 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
heater31 wrote:jo172 wrote:I also note that a simple way to avoid this rule is to go to a Third Club.
That is, if I want to transfer from SPOC to Uni, but 3 people this season already have and SPOC doesn't want to let anyone else transfer, there's nothing in the new 10.3A to prevent me clearing from SPOC to Walkerville to Uni as Walkerville would become the "current club"
Isn't there a rule that if a player wants to move club's a 2nd time in the same season the the original club must also give a clearance.....
From memory you're right, although I can't find it anywhere at the moment.
- Boosh
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:42 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Team: North Haven
- Has thanked: 256 times
- Been thanked: 192 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
heater31 wrote:jo172 wrote:I also note that a simple way to avoid this rule is to go to a Third Club.
That is, if I want to transfer from SPOC to Uni, but 3 people this season already have and SPOC doesn't want to let anyone else transfer, there's nothing in the new 10.3A to prevent me clearing from SPOC to Walkerville to Uni as Walkerville would become the "current club"
Isn't there a rule that if a player wants to move club's a 2nd time in the same season the the original club must also give a clearance.....
You are always graded on what you played the previous season so I think that would apply here too.
Otherwise as it stands you could transfer into a SAAFL club as a 3 pointer play no games and transfer to another SAAFL club as 2 points.
I agree with an earlier post that the player needs an avenue to appeal. We exchange a lot of players with Port District and Portland mostly in the lower grades, sometimes in our favour and other times not in our favour but it usually balances out over a longer period.
This could be affected by that rule and it would impact lower grades more so than higher grades.
A case in point would be that we cleared probably 5 or 6 to Rosewater this year, now only one of those would have played B Grade or higher for us and once they were financial they were cleared but we could have held them based on this rule which would have been unfair.
It also prevents us recruiting 5 or 6 from Goodwood's A Grade this year, I hear they go alright.
I have a problem. It's to do with the little man, the squashed-in French man, the naked little squashed up hairy boy! You know! With the hand feet
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
- Q.
- Coach
- Posts: 22019
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Houghton Districts
- Location: El Dorado
- Has thanked: 970 times
- Been thanked: 2397 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
^^^ you make a good point, this is probably only penalising the players in low grades who want a change in scenery.
And assumes that most blokes only have two mates.
And assumes that most blokes only have two mates.
- Boosh
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:42 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Team: North Haven
- Has thanked: 256 times
- Been thanked: 192 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
Q. wrote:^^^ you make a good point, this is probably only penalising the players in low grades who want a change in scenery.
And assumes that most blokes only have two mates.
Well if a club wanted 4 from another club they would clear them in order of ability so the lower you get the more likely you would lose out.
Unfortunately I would be the last cleared in this circumstance but luckily for me I don't have many friends.
I have a problem. It's to do with the little man, the squashed-in French man, the naked little squashed up hairy boy! You know! With the hand feet
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
- Look Good In Leather
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:50 am
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Christies Beach
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 289 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
How does the points system work in the SAAFL for clubs that do not have junior grades or feeder schools?
What are clubs like Adelaide University, Central United, Flinders University, Greenacres, Houghton Districts, Mawson Lakes, North Pines, Smithfield & Wingfield Royals going to be able to do as their current groups retire off?
The clubs with juniors and the old scholars bloc are pretty obvious, but what rules are in place for the University clubs. Do the other clubs with no juniors have to rely on a minimum of recruits and then newbies?
What are clubs like Adelaide University, Central United, Flinders University, Greenacres, Houghton Districts, Mawson Lakes, North Pines, Smithfield & Wingfield Royals going to be able to do as their current groups retire off?
The clubs with juniors and the old scholars bloc are pretty obvious, but what rules are in place for the University clubs. Do the other clubs with no juniors have to rely on a minimum of recruits and then newbies?
- HH3
- Coach
- Posts: 11643
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
- Team: North Melbourne
- Team: North Haven
- Has thanked: 3301 times
- Been thanked: 2433 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
Look Good In Leather wrote:How does the points system work in the SAAFL for clubs that do not have junior grades or feeder schools?
What are clubs like Adelaide University, Central United, Flinders University, Greenacres, Houghton Districts, Mawson Lakes, North Pines, Smithfield & Wingfield Royals going to be able to do as their current groups retire off?
The clubs with juniors and the old scholars bloc are pretty obvious, but what rules are in place for the University clubs. Do the other clubs with no juniors have to rely on a minimum of recruits and then newbies?
I dont think many teams have huge chunks of players retiring or leaving at the end of every year. If you bring in 4 to 5 new players from elsewhere every year, you'll be fine. The chances of all of them coming from the same club are pretty slim.
I TOLD YOU SO
2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
- Look Good In Leather
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:50 am
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Christies Beach
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 289 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
HH3 wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:How does the points system work in the SAAFL for clubs that do not have junior grades or feeder schools?
What are clubs like Adelaide University, Central United, Flinders University, Greenacres, Houghton Districts, Mawson Lakes, North Pines, Smithfield & Wingfield Royals going to be able to do as their current groups retire off?
The clubs with juniors and the old scholars bloc are pretty obvious, but what rules are in place for the University clubs. Do the other clubs with no juniors have to rely on a minimum of recruits and then newbies?
I dont think many teams have huge chunks of players retiring or leaving at the end of every year. If you bring in 4 to 5 new players from elsewhere every year, you'll be fine. The chances of all of them coming from the same club are pretty slim.
15 points = 5 x 3 point players in Year 1, following season those are still worth 10 points before you start. Effectively could only bring in 1 or 2 each year there after.
Lose a couple of zero pointers for whatever reason and things would be awkward, unless you play your recruits in the B-Grade for a few years to get their points down.
-
X Runna
- Reserves
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:17 am
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Team: Ingle Farm
- Has thanked: 124 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
Look Good In Leather wrote:How does the points system work in the SAAFL for clubs that do not have junior grades or feeder schools?
What are clubs like Adelaide University, Central United, Flinders University, Greenacres, Houghton Districts, Mawson Lakes, North Pines, Smithfield & Wingfield Royals going to be able to do as their current groups retire off?
The clubs with juniors and the old scholars bloc are pretty obvious, but what rules are in place for the University clubs. Do the other clubs with no juniors have to rely on a minimum of recruits and then newbies?
Hopefully some of them do everyone a favour & fold
- Q.
- Coach
- Posts: 22019
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Houghton Districts
- Location: El Dorado
- Has thanked: 970 times
- Been thanked: 2397 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
Look Good In Leather wrote:How does the points system work in the SAAFL for clubs that do not have junior grades or feeder schools?
What are clubs like Adelaide University, Central United, Flinders University, Greenacres, Houghton Districts, Mawson Lakes, North Pines, Smithfield & Wingfield Royals going to be able to do as their current groups retire off?
The clubs with juniors and the old scholars bloc are pretty obvious, but what rules are in place for the University clubs. Do the other clubs with no juniors have to rely on a minimum of recruits and then newbies?
Damn, what will we do when the dozen or so fifty yr old players decide to finally hang up the boots.
- Mr Beefy
- Coach
- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:18 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Rosewater
- Has thanked: 414 times
- Been thanked: 695 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
Footy Chick wrote:The rest of the APPS rules, for those playing at home.
I see that anyone who has played the majority B Grade and played an A Grade game in the past 2 years is now worth a minimum of 1 point....except if they transfer within the same division.
Doesn't make sense to me that a B Grader from Goody Saints (who played 1 A Grade game in the past 2 years) can go to Henley for 0 points but if he goes to Unley he is worth 1 point.
- HH3
- Coach
- Posts: 11643
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
- Team: North Melbourne
- Team: North Haven
- Has thanked: 3301 times
- Been thanked: 2433 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
Mr Beefy wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The rest of the APPS rules, for those playing at home.
I see that anyone who has played the majority B Grade and played an A Grade game in the past 2 years is now worth a minimum of 1 point....except if they transfer within the same division.
Doesn't make sense to me that a B Grader from Goody Saints (who played 1 A Grade game in the past 2 years) can go to Henley for 0 points but if he goes to Unley he is worth 1 point.
Probably so you can't recruit a ton of Div 1 B graders to fill a Div 3, 4, or 5 A grade.
I TOLD YOU SO
2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
- Mr Beefy
- Coach
- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:18 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Rosewater
- Has thanked: 414 times
- Been thanked: 695 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
HH3 wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The rest of the APPS rules, for those playing at home.
I see that anyone who has played the majority B Grade and played an A Grade game in the past 2 years is now worth a minimum of 1 point....except if they transfer within the same division.
Doesn't make sense to me that a B Grader from Goody Saints (who played 1 A Grade game in the past 2 years) can go to Henley for 0 points but if he goes to Unley he is worth 1 point.
Probably so you can't recruit a ton of Div 1 B graders to fill a Div 3, 4, or 5 A grade.
Spread the talent I say
- Boosh
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:42 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Team: North Haven
- Has thanked: 256 times
- Been thanked: 192 times
- Contact:
Re: APPS New recruiting rules - Your thoughts?
Mr Beefy wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The rest of the APPS rules, for those playing at home.
I see that anyone who has played the majority B Grade and played an A Grade game in the past 2 years is now worth a minimum of 1 point....except if they transfer within the same division.
Doesn't make sense to me that a B Grader from Goody Saints (who played 1 A Grade game in the past 2 years) can go to Henley for 0 points but if he goes to Unley he is worth 1 point.
The rich get richer so on and so forth
I have a problem. It's to do with the little man, the squashed-in French man, the naked little squashed up hairy boy! You know! With the hand feet
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests
