Port Adelaide 2017

morell · Post by **morell** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:15 am

Booney wrote:
morell wrote:You mean that measurement that correctly predicted the AA ruckman? Despite every other man and his dog protesting?

#swarm

Well, no, we could tell by watching him play that he was going to be one of the two or three in discussion and was rightly favored by many to be the AA ruckman. SWARM just kept you warm at night.

Nah man, there were many posters that didn't have Ryder near it. People had Kruezer in front of him FFS. Kruezer!

SWARM even had the order right in the end....

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:27 am

amber_fluid wrote:They’re still trying to understand the logic behind Morrell’s SWARM analysis/graphs.

There's only 1 person that understands that.

morell · Post by **morell** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:37 am

Was it right?

#OutcomeFocused
#SWARM

Trader · Post by **Trader** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:38 am

morell wrote:Was it right?

#OutcomeFocused
#SWARM

If I multiply 2 by 2 when I was asked what their sum was, I get the right answer, but still had NFI what I was doing.

morell · Post by **morell** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:57 am

Process, process, process - said in Brady bunch tone

I'll back in SWARM's rigour every day of the week. A simple z score average of a couple of metrics is a reasonably fool-proof statistical method for evaluating something. As you would know, Trader

Post by **Dutchy** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 1:51 pm

Why wouldn't Brisbane match and force a trade? [ala Dangerfield] Surely they don't let him go for nothing

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 2:11 pm

Dutchy wrote:Why wouldn't Brisbane match and force a trade? [ala Dangerfield] Surely they don't let him go for nothing

Get a higher compo pick

morell · Post by **morell** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 2:28 pm

Dutchy wrote:Why wouldn't Brisbane match and force a trade? [ala Dangerfield] Surely they don't let him go for nothing

C'mon Dutchy, Jesus. Read like the last page.

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:37 pm

I've decided Port supporters are equally as "special" as Crows supporters.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:38 pm

The Bedge wrote:I've decided Port supporters are equally as "special" as Crows supporters.

Football supporters (full stop).

Luckily we're not EPL type mad, or are we?

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:49 pm

Booney wrote:
The Bedge wrote:I've decided Port supporters are equally as "special" as Crows supporters.

Football supporters (full stop).

Luckily we're not EPL type mad, or are we?

Very true! They're some weird nuts those EPL fans haha

MW · Post by MW » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:58 pm

Booney wrote:
The Bedge wrote:I've decided Port supporters are equally as "special" as Crows supporters.

Football supporters (full stop).

Luckily we're not EPL type mad, or are we?

Yeah we are!

MW · Post by MW » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:51 pm

Ryder press conf today had not one single port power signage or item of clothing from him or thomas. Interesting

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:08 pm

MW wrote:Ryder press conf today had not one single port power signage or item of clothing from him or thomas. Interesting

he did look weird in just a plain black t-shirt, not usually how you see the players

MW · Post by MW » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:18 pm

Very odd. Port distancing themselves from patty.

Trader · Post by **Trader** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:53 pm

morell wrote:https://thewest.com.au/sport/afl/port-powers-patrick-ryder-charged-after-fracas-outside-adelaide-nightclub-ng-b88616038z
...
Following the incident Ryder was charged with an assault and hindering police.

...

In addition to Ryder, SA Police confirmed a 22-year-old man from Western Australia was arrested and charged with resisting police, and a 23-year-old man from Western Australia was arrested and charged with assaulting police.

Note the difference in bold people.

morell wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:
morell wrote:The fact hes been charged with assault and hindering police, not assault and assault on police, speaks volumes.

Adelaidenow website is reporting he has been charged with assaulting police.

Again, it's an assault and hindering police. Wording is important.

Assault and hindering police - depending on the severity of the assault that is a hefty fine and community service. Hindering can be standing in the way to block them or grabbing their arm. Even constantly arguing with them can be considered hindering police I believe.

Assault of police? That's big house type stuff and is entirely different.

Today's media statement from KT and PR said "assault on a police officer". Sounds like trouble is a brewing!

Post by **Dutchy** » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:57 pm

MW wrote:Very odd. Port distancing themselves from patty.

last time this was done was the Essendon scandal

amber_fluid · Post by **amber_fluid** » Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:49 am

MW wrote:Very odd. Port distancing themselves from patty.

Sounds like there is more to the story...............

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Fri Oct 06, 2017 9:37 am

Interesting Hinkley said on radio last night he hadn't spoken to Trengrove about leaving yet the paperwork for FA has already been lodged

amber_fluid · Post by **amber_fluid** » Fri Oct 06, 2017 9:44 am

MW wrote:Ryder press conf today had not one single port power signage or item of clothing from him or thomas. Interesting

What was the point of the press conference?
KT and Ryder both said bugger all?

Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Re: Port Adelaide 2017

Who is online