morell wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:jo172 wrote:morell wrote:What deceit? They saw some plans, didn't like them.
You want them to release and tacitly endorse plans they don't actually support?
But for allowing the sale of the Hospital and DPA to make the plans possible/feasible.
They didn't have to like the plans but their policy positions undoubtedly created the underlying situation that led to the Plans.
Hamilton-Smith and Labor can hardly wash their hands and say nothing to do with us.
Or maybe release them and say they don't support them
and if they did that they'd be naive in the extreme. And foolish.
Have you been involved in the public consultation space before?
Yes, but I wasn't involved in this one:
https://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf ... al-DPA.pdfSo, the Development Plan was changed to allow a wider range of uses for the new owners.
Very convenient. Probably doubled or tripled the price.
Who would have thought we would end up with what they are proposing now?
ACH Group’s vision for renewal of the Repat includes an exciting mixed-use site for the whole community (included but not limited to):
• health and aged care services, including transition care and day hospital services
• both inpatient and outpatient services
• education and training facilities
• accommodation with an emphasis towards supporting the needs of aged persons, retirement living, Veterans, disability and students
• a research and innovation hub
• open, green spaces, gardens and cafes that will be available for the whole community to use
• continued community use of the hydrotherapy pool
• veterans’ services; and
• allied health services including medical imaging, pathology, podiatry, and pharmacy.
Very LTO like. Allow the new owners access to the data and, bingo; 4x the price
But nothing to do with the government is it?????