The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:37 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by LMA »

Jim05 wrote:
LMA wrote:
Reddeer wrote:Well it will be mission accomplished (Complete rape of the comp) by the afl but I am sure there would be 50000 sheep like attendees at the GF mainly with free tickets issued to show how great it is


Port v Norwood would attract close to 50 thousand, no sheep though.

Well last GF we played it was about 70/30 split Norwood’s way in crowd


Did you have a sheep counter?
User avatar
Grenville
Veteran
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:53 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 262 times
Been thanked: 761 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Grenville »

Reddeer wrote:Well it will be mission accomplished (Complete rape of the comp) by the afl but I am sure there would be 50000 sheep like attendees at the GF mainly with free tickets issued to show how great it is


Correct weight lad.
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by therisingblues »

LMA wrote:
Reddeer wrote:Well it will be mission accomplished (Complete rape of the comp) by the afl but I am sure there would be 50000 sheep like attendees at the GF mainly with free tickets issued to show how great it is


Port v Norwood would attract close to 50 thousand, no sheep though.

You blokes had your chance in 2014, at Adelaide Oval.nThe figure was 39,000 if I remember right.
Maybe could've gotten more, but from where I was sitting there were simply no Port fans about.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Dogs64 »

Lucky the inception of the reserves sides has led to such great success for the Crows and Port in the AFL, imagine how poorly they'd be performing under the "old" system.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by stan »

Dogs64 wrote:Lucky the inception of the reserves sides has led to such great success for the Crows and Port in the AFL, imagine how poorly they'd be performing under the "old" system.
Lol, I'd give this post of the day
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29218
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by whufc »

Dogs64 wrote:Lucky the inception of the reserves sides has led to such great success for the Crows and Port in the AFL, imagine how poorly they'd be performing under the "old" system.


It is a great point. I think as bias as we are to the SANFL we could all appreciate the AFL teams want to have all their players under the same banner BUT if we are perfectly honest the stats have shown that it is has no direct correlation with success and may actually not improve a clubs performance.

Further to that look at how quick Brisbane have rised back to the top of the AFL yet their reserve players are arguably learning their trade in the lowest standard of competition amongst all AFL teams.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16426
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:18 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by amber_fluid »

If Port or the Crows wanted to win the GF they would.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47493
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4839 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Dutchy »

Dogs64 wrote:Lucky the inception of the reserves sides has led to such great success for the Crows and Port in the AFL, imagine how poorly they'd be performing under the "old" system.


Sanderson and Trigg had an agenda to blame not having a reserves side for their AFL failings, now they have been found out as frauds and we are stuck with their delusions as our reality
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:11 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by JK »

Dutchy wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:Lucky the inception of the reserves sides has led to such great success for the Crows and Port in the AFL, imagine how poorly they'd be performing under the "old" system.


Sanderson and Trigg had an agenda to blame not having a reserves side for their AFL failings, now they have been found out as frauds and we are stuck with their delusions as our reality


Yep .. Early-Mid 2000's Victorian clubs and media were bemoaning the fact the Crows and Power had an advantage in development with their players in the SANFL. Not long after the AFL successfully leant on the SANFL to reduce the Salary Cap. Not long after that the AFL clubs successfully lobbied for their own reserves sides.

Completely understandable Crows and Port would want total control of their reserves players, but not sure how much benefit they've derived from it when the competition has weakened?
FUSC
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by RB »

Dutchy wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:Lucky the inception of the reserves sides has led to such great success for the Crows and Port in the AFL, imagine how poorly they'd be performing under the "old" system.


Sanderson and Trigg had an agenda to blame not having a reserves side for their AFL failings, now they have been found out as frauds and we are stuck with their delusions as our reality

Sanderson and Triggy frauds? Never!! [emoji23][emoji23]
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
StrayDog
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:26 pm
Team: Central District
Location: Carpark.
Has thanked: 1361 times
Been thanked: 210 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by StrayDog »

JK wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:Lucky the inception of the reserves sides has led to such great success for the Crows and Port in the AFL, imagine how poorly they'd be performing under the "old" system.


Sanderson and Trigg had an agenda to blame not having a reserves side for their AFL failings, now they have been found out as frauds and we are stuck with their delusions as our reality


Yep .. Early-Mid 2000's Victorian clubs and media were bemoaning the fact the Crows and Power had an advantage in development with their players in the SANFL. Not long after the AFL successfully leant on the SANFL to reduce the Salary Cap. Not long after that the AFL clubs successfully lobbied for their own reserves sides.

Completely understandable Crows and Port would want total control of their reserves players, but not sure how much benefit they've derived from it when the competition has weakened?

A few over there were keenly looking at our arrangement in the '90s, well before the AFL Reserves were dissolved.
"— here I opened wide the door; —
Darkness there, and nothing more."


- Edgar Allan Poe from " The Raven "

Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Dogs64 »

JK wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:Lucky the inception of the reserves sides has led to such great success for the Crows and Port in the AFL, imagine how poorly they'd be performing under the "old" system.


Sanderson and Trigg had an agenda to blame not having a reserves side for their AFL failings, now they have been found out as frauds and we are stuck with their delusions as our reality


Yep .. Early-Mid 2000's Victorian clubs and media were bemoaning the fact the Crows and Power had an advantage in development with their players in the SANFL. Not long after the AFL successfully leant on the SANFL to reduce the Salary Cap. Not long after that the AFL clubs successfully lobbied for their own reserves sides.

Completely understandable Crows and Port would want total control of their reserves players, but not sure how much benefit they've derived from it when the competition has weakened?


Correct. Pre Trigg and Sanderson an AFL report found having the players play in dispersed SANFL teams was an advantage the Crows/Power had. Both Malcolm Blight and Neil Craig had commented on it as an advantage and the best methodology for player development. Not so sure that there's no correlation The teams won three premierships between them pre AFL reserves and have been pretty crap ever since (excluding one GF appearance by the Crows). One of the arguments "for" supposedly was going to be player retention, I can't see how that's eventuated.

I remember speaking to retired CDFC and ex Brisbane Lions player Tom Collier and whilst at Brisbane he really disliked playing in the AFL reserves system (for Brisbane) for many reasons, thought the old system we had was better for players.
gazzamagoo

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by gazzamagoo »

Was told by a club official on Saturday that Port Melbourne & Williamstown have applied to be in the SANFL in 2021.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Jim05 »

gazzamagoo wrote:Was told by a club official on Saturday that Port Melbourne & Williamstown have applied to be in the SANFL in 2021.

Have heard the same.
Swans, Giants, Suns and Lions will play their ressies in the VFL from 2021 also
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by RB »

Easy. Trade Port Melbourne and Williamstown for the Ravens and Power reserves. So long and don't let the door hit you on the way out.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by stan »

Jim05 wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:Was told by a club official on Saturday that Port Melbourne & Williamstown have applied to be in the SANFL in 2021.

Have heard the same.
Swans, Giants, Suns and Lions will play their ressies in the VFL from 2021 also
So Sydney and Brisbane reserves teams will play in Victoria, Victorian actual VFL teams will play in SA...hmm yeah well that's about the logic at the moment so it wouldn't surprise me at all.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by heater31 »

gazzamagoo wrote:Was told by a club official on Saturday that Port Melbourne & Williamstown have applied to be in the SANFL in 2021.
Would have no issues with that. 2 very proud stand alone VFL clubs. Whilst they may have had AFL affiliation in the past they have stood on their own 2 feet for a while now.
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29218
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by whufc »

heater31 wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:Was told by a club official on Saturday that Port Melbourne & Williamstown have applied to be in the SANFL in 2021.
Would have no issues with that. 2 very proud stand alone VFL clubs. Whilst they may have had AFL affiliation in the past they have stood on their own 2 feet for a while now.


Agree, couldn't see a single issue with a couple of stand alone state league clubs entering the comp. Remove the AFL reserves and I could easily a SANFL resurgence.

Would make for a great away trip.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
Spargo
Coach
Posts: 17680
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Sacred Heart OC
Location: Getting out of Dodge
Has thanked: 6417 times
Been thanked: 5688 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Spargo »

whufc wrote:Would make for a great away trip.


Beat me to it!
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot

Time to get moving…
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47493
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4839 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Dutchy »

its exactly what the SANFL needs and I have been advocating for years, make the SANFL a genuine 2nd tier competition that allows for players to be semi professional and have long careers if or when they don't make the top tier.

It can still develop players for the AFL but be a genuine seperate competition at the same time.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 226 guests