Maintain the ragetipper wrote:better than the sample size the crows used when they claimed they would get 4k crowds to their reserve gamesBooney wrote:Good sample size you've used to support your argument.southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
and better than the sample size used when the reserve sides were introduced and we were told it was going to be a good thing...
COVID
-
Reddeer
- Reserves
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:32 pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
Verschrikkelyk!!
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
tipper wrote:better than the sample size the crows used when they claimed they would get 4k crowds to their reserve gamesBooney wrote:Good sample size you've used to support your argument.southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
and better than the sample size used when the reserve sides were introduced and we were told it was going to be a good thing...
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Pseudo
- Coach
- Posts: 12499
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Marion
- Location: enculez-vous
- Been thanked: 1712 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...Booney wrote:Good sample size you've used to support your argument.southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
- RB
- Coach
- Posts: 6640
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
- Has thanked: 931 times
- Been thanked: 1392 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
Agreed, Pseudo. In the interests of science, if nothing else.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
And break the contract? I don't think so.Pseudo wrote:By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...Booney wrote:Good sample size you've used to support your argument.southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
bulldogproud
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 3113
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Western Bulldogs
- Team: Imperials
- Location: West Beach
- Has thanked: 489 times
- Been thanked: 401 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?Booney wrote:And break the contract? I don't think so.Pseudo wrote:By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...Booney wrote:Good sample size you've used to support your argument.southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
The Port Adelaide Football Club logo?bulldogproud wrote: Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?
Cheers
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Jimmy_041
- Coach
- Posts: 15662
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Port District
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 1408 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
I get confused with all of these Port AdelaidesBooney wrote:The Port Adelaide Football Club logo?bulldogproud wrote: Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?
Cheers
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
Struggling counting to 1? Poor chap.Jimmy_041 wrote:I get confused with all of these Port AdelaidesBooney wrote:The Port Adelaide Football Club logo?bulldogproud wrote: Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?
Cheers
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
bulldogproud
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 3113
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Western Bulldogs
- Team: Imperials
- Location: West Beach
- Has thanked: 489 times
- Been thanked: 401 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
They have ditched the magpie in favour of the Power's logo indicating they are no longer Port Adelaide Magpies. They contracted with the SANFL as the Port Adelaide Magpies.Booney wrote:The Port Adelaide Football Club logo?bulldogproud wrote: Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?
Cheers
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
- Pseudo
- Coach
- Posts: 12499
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Marion
- Location: enculez-vous
- Been thanked: 1712 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
They've broken it before; I'm sure they can break it again, especially for the sake of due diligence.Booney wrote:And break the contract? I don't think so.Pseudo wrote:By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...Booney wrote:Good sample size you've used to support your argument.southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
So long as our compensation is adequate I guess we could consider it.Pseudo wrote: They've broken it before; I'm sure they can break it again, especially for the sake of due diligence.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Pseudo
- Coach
- Posts: 12499
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Marion
- Location: enculez-vous
- Been thanked: 1712 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
Still waiting on the compensation for last year's breach. Tell you what, we'll consider it even.Booney wrote:So long as our compensation is adequate I guess we could consider it.Pseudo wrote: They've broken it before; I'm sure they can break it again, especially for the sake of due diligence.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
That's quite favourable to you, we'll consider this and come back. Literally. We'll. Come. Back.Pseudo wrote:Still waiting on the compensation for last year's breach. Tell you what, we'll consider it even.Booney wrote:So long as our compensation is adequate I guess we could consider it.Pseudo wrote: They've broken it before; I'm sure they can break it again, especially for the sake of due diligence.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
gazzamagoo
Re: COVID
broken already,Booney wrote:And break the contract? I don't think so.Pseudo wrote:By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...Booney wrote:Good sample size you've used to support your argument.southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
didn't play last season & haven't paid their bill.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
Shows how much you want / need us then, doesn't it?gazzamagoo wrote: broken already,
didn't play last season & haven't paid their bill.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
gazzamagoo
Re: COVID
something tells me we've digressed somewhat
Booney, what are your thoughts on this matter,
do you think, with all these borders opening & closing all the time & with the constant threat of Covid outbreaks all the time, is it wise for the 2 clubs in question to field their teams in the SANFL? And I'm actually being serious lol
What would happen if we start the footy season, only for an outbreak to occur & travel bubbles are once again imposed?
What happens if we're 3 or 6 round into the season?
Do Port & Crows forfeit the remaining matches, resulting in their opponents winning by default?
Interesting stuff!
Booney, what are your thoughts on this matter,
do you think, with all these borders opening & closing all the time & with the constant threat of Covid outbreaks all the time, is it wise for the 2 clubs in question to field their teams in the SANFL? And I'm actually being serious lol
What would happen if we start the footy season, only for an outbreak to occur & travel bubbles are once again imposed?
What happens if we're 3 or 6 round into the season?
Do Port & Crows forfeit the remaining matches, resulting in their opponents winning by default?
Interesting stuff!
-
whufc
- Coach
- Posts: 29218
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: BSR
- Location: Blakeview
- Has thanked: 6065 times
- Been thanked: 2933 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
Sportsbet odd on favourite the answer is 'do whatever Port needs us to do', let them play until it happens then forfeit if they cant, There 'reserves' players must get a game so we have no choice but to cater for what they need.gazzamagoo wrote:something tells me we've digressed somewhat![]()
![]()
Booney, what are your thoughts on this matter,
do you think, with all these borders opening & closing all the time & with the constant threat of Covid outbreaks all the time, is it wise for the 2 clubs in question to field their teams in the SANFL? And I'm actually being serious lol
What would happen if we start the footy season, only for an outbreak to occur & travel bubbles are once again imposed?
What happens if we're 3 or 6 round into the season?
Do Port & Crows forfeit the remaining matches, resulting in their opponents winning by default?
Interesting stuff!
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
I think we now have 16 SANFL listed players. We have 42 on our AFL list.gazzamagoo wrote:something tells me we've digressed somewhat![]()
![]()
Booney, what are your thoughts on this matter,
do you think, with all these borders opening & closing all the time & with the constant threat of Covid outbreaks all the time, is it wise for the 2 clubs in question to field their teams in the SANFL? And I'm actually being serious lol
What would happen if we start the footy season, only for an outbreak to occur & travel bubbles are once again imposed?
What happens if we're 3 or 6 round into the season?
Do Port & Crows forfeit the remaining matches, resulting in their opponents winning by default?
Interesting stuff!
If, by chance, another Queensland based hub was to eventuate ( I don't think this will given the nature of COVID response in Australia is completely different in mid-2021 than it was in early / mid 2020 ) then we would probably do what we did last year, take 30 or 32 players into the hub leaving 10-12 players here + the 16 SANFL listed = 26-28.
Allow for some injuries or quarantine etc ( 4-6 ) then we would have 20+ here in Adelaide with potentially only 4-6 of them AFL listed.
Given the situation I'd say the SANFL would rather us add to our SANFL list via local talent than remove us from the season.
Keep in mind the AFL removed the SANFL sides last year as it was all a complete unknown, in the end it was probably an over reaction but what were they to do? I'd imagine 2021 has far more planning and contingency plans in place if there were to be another AFL hub situation.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
bulldogproud
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 3113
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Western Bulldogs
- Team: Imperials
- Location: West Beach
- Has thanked: 489 times
- Been thanked: 401 times
- Contact:
Re: COVID
As each AwFuL linked club would have approximately half a full squad of SANFL players, is it possible that the Crows and Power reserves form into the one team, giving us a nine-team competition if Covid does intervene?Booney wrote:I think we now have 16 SANFL listed players. We have 42 on our AFL list.gazzamagoo wrote:something tells me we've digressed somewhat![]()
![]()
Booney, what are your thoughts on this matter,
do you think, with all these borders opening & closing all the time & with the constant threat of Covid outbreaks all the time, is it wise for the 2 clubs in question to field their teams in the SANFL? And I'm actually being serious lol
What would happen if we start the footy season, only for an outbreak to occur & travel bubbles are once again imposed?
What happens if we're 3 or 6 round into the season?
Do Port & Crows forfeit the remaining matches, resulting in their opponents winning by default?
Interesting stuff!
If, by chance, another Queensland based hub was to eventuate ( I don't think this will given the nature of COVID response in Australia is completely different in mid-2021 than it was in early / mid 2020 ) then we would probably do what we did last year, take 30 or 32 players into the hub leaving 10-12 players here + the 16 SANFL listed = 26-28.
Allow for some injuries or quarantine etc ( 4-6 ) then we would have 20+ here in Adelaide with potentially only 4-6 of them AFL listed.
Given the situation I'd say the SANFL would rather us add to our SANFL list via local talent than remove us from the season.
Keep in mind the AFL removed the SANFL sides last year as it was all a complete unknown, in the end it was probably an over reaction but what were they to do? I'd imagine 2021 has far more planning and contingency plans in place if there were to be another AFL hub situation.
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 240 guests
