COVID

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Reddeer
Reserves
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:32 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Reddeer »

tipper wrote:
Booney wrote:
southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Good sample size you've used to support your argument.
better than the sample size the crows used when they claimed they would get 4k crowds to their reserve games

and better than the sample size used when the reserve sides were introduced and we were told it was going to be a good thing...
Maintain the rage
Verschrikkelyk!!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Booney »

tipper wrote:
Booney wrote:
southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Good sample size you've used to support your argument.
better than the sample size the crows used when they claimed they would get 4k crowds to their reserve games

and better than the sample size used when the reserve sides were introduced and we were told it was going to be a good thing...
:lol:
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12499
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Pseudo »

Booney wrote:
southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Good sample size you've used to support your argument.
By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by RB »

Agreed, Pseudo. In the interests of science, if nothing else.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Booney »

Pseudo wrote:
Booney wrote:
southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Good sample size you've used to support your argument.
By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...
And break the contract? I don't think so.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Imperials
Location: West Beach
Has thanked: 489 times
Been thanked: 401 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by bulldogproud »

Booney wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
Booney wrote:
southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Good sample size you've used to support your argument.
By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...
And break the contract? I don't think so.
Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Booney »

bulldogproud wrote: Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?
Cheers
The Port Adelaide Football Club logo?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1408 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Booney wrote:
bulldogproud wrote: Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?
Cheers
The Port Adelaide Football Club logo?
I get confused with all of these Port Adelaides
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Booney »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Booney wrote:
bulldogproud wrote: Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?
Cheers
The Port Adelaide Football Club logo?
I get confused with all of these Port Adelaides
Struggling counting to 1? Poor chap.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Imperials
Location: West Beach
Has thanked: 489 times
Been thanked: 401 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by bulldogproud »

Booney wrote:
bulldogproud wrote: Isn't the contract already broken? By changing their logo, haven't Port Magpies already admitted they have changed to being Port Power Reserves?
Cheers
The Port Adelaide Football Club logo?
They have ditched the magpie in favour of the Power's logo indicating they are no longer Port Adelaide Magpies. They contracted with the SANFL as the Port Adelaide Magpies.
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12499
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Pseudo »

Booney wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
Booney wrote:
southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Good sample size you've used to support your argument.
By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...
And break the contract? I don't think so.
They've broken it before; I'm sure they can break it again, especially for the sake of due diligence.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Booney »

Pseudo wrote: They've broken it before; I'm sure they can break it again, especially for the sake of due diligence.
So long as our compensation is adequate I guess we could consider it.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12499
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Pseudo »

Booney wrote:
Pseudo wrote: They've broken it before; I'm sure they can break it again, especially for the sake of due diligence.
So long as our compensation is adequate I guess we could consider it.
Still waiting on the compensation for last year's breach. Tell you what, we'll consider it even.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Booney »

Pseudo wrote:
Booney wrote:
Pseudo wrote: They've broken it before; I'm sure they can break it again, especially for the sake of due diligence.
So long as our compensation is adequate I guess we could consider it.
Still waiting on the compensation for last year's breach. Tell you what, we'll consider it even.
That's quite favourable to you, we'll consider this and come back. Literally. We'll. Come. Back.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
gazzamagoo

Re: COVID

Post by gazzamagoo »

Booney wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
Booney wrote:
southernbulldog wrote:Last season showed we dont need them
Good sample size you've used to support your argument.
By god you're right, we need more data! Better keep them out for another decade or two so we can collect a decent sample...
And break the contract? I don't think so.
broken already,
didn't play last season & haven't paid their bill.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Booney »

gazzamagoo wrote: broken already,
didn't play last season & haven't paid their bill.
Shows how much you want / need us then, doesn't it?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
gazzamagoo

Re: COVID

Post by gazzamagoo »

something tells me we've digressed somewhat :D :D
Booney, what are your thoughts on this matter,
do you think, with all these borders opening & closing all the time & with the constant threat of Covid outbreaks all the time, is it wise for the 2 clubs in question to field their teams in the SANFL? And I'm actually being serious lol
What would happen if we start the footy season, only for an outbreak to occur & travel bubbles are once again imposed?
What happens if we're 3 or 6 round into the season?
Do Port & Crows forfeit the remaining matches, resulting in their opponents winning by default?
Interesting stuff!
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29218
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by whufc »

gazzamagoo wrote:something tells me we've digressed somewhat :D :D
Booney, what are your thoughts on this matter,
do you think, with all these borders opening & closing all the time & with the constant threat of Covid outbreaks all the time, is it wise for the 2 clubs in question to field their teams in the SANFL? And I'm actually being serious lol
What would happen if we start the footy season, only for an outbreak to occur & travel bubbles are once again imposed?
What happens if we're 3 or 6 round into the season?
Do Port & Crows forfeit the remaining matches, resulting in their opponents winning by default?
Interesting stuff!
Sportsbet odd on favourite the answer is 'do whatever Port needs us to do', let them play until it happens then forfeit if they cant, There 'reserves' players must get a game so we have no choice but to cater for what they need.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by Booney »

gazzamagoo wrote:something tells me we've digressed somewhat :D :D
Booney, what are your thoughts on this matter,
do you think, with all these borders opening & closing all the time & with the constant threat of Covid outbreaks all the time, is it wise for the 2 clubs in question to field their teams in the SANFL? And I'm actually being serious lol
What would happen if we start the footy season, only for an outbreak to occur & travel bubbles are once again imposed?
What happens if we're 3 or 6 round into the season?
Do Port & Crows forfeit the remaining matches, resulting in their opponents winning by default?
Interesting stuff!
I think we now have 16 SANFL listed players. We have 42 on our AFL list.

If, by chance, another Queensland based hub was to eventuate ( I don't think this will given the nature of COVID response in Australia is completely different in mid-2021 than it was in early / mid 2020 ) then we would probably do what we did last year, take 30 or 32 players into the hub leaving 10-12 players here + the 16 SANFL listed = 26-28.

Allow for some injuries or quarantine etc ( 4-6 ) then we would have 20+ here in Adelaide with potentially only 4-6 of them AFL listed.

Given the situation I'd say the SANFL would rather us add to our SANFL list via local talent than remove us from the season.

Keep in mind the AFL removed the SANFL sides last year as it was all a complete unknown, in the end it was probably an over reaction but what were they to do? I'd imagine 2021 has far more planning and contingency plans in place if there were to be another AFL hub situation.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Imperials
Location: West Beach
Has thanked: 489 times
Been thanked: 401 times
Contact:

Re: COVID

Post by bulldogproud »

Booney wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:something tells me we've digressed somewhat :D :D
Booney, what are your thoughts on this matter,
do you think, with all these borders opening & closing all the time & with the constant threat of Covid outbreaks all the time, is it wise for the 2 clubs in question to field their teams in the SANFL? And I'm actually being serious lol
What would happen if we start the footy season, only for an outbreak to occur & travel bubbles are once again imposed?
What happens if we're 3 or 6 round into the season?
Do Port & Crows forfeit the remaining matches, resulting in their opponents winning by default?
Interesting stuff!
I think we now have 16 SANFL listed players. We have 42 on our AFL list.

If, by chance, another Queensland based hub was to eventuate ( I don't think this will given the nature of COVID response in Australia is completely different in mid-2021 than it was in early / mid 2020 ) then we would probably do what we did last year, take 30 or 32 players into the hub leaving 10-12 players here + the 16 SANFL listed = 26-28.

Allow for some injuries or quarantine etc ( 4-6 ) then we would have 20+ here in Adelaide with potentially only 4-6 of them AFL listed.

Given the situation I'd say the SANFL would rather us add to our SANFL list via local talent than remove us from the season.

Keep in mind the AFL removed the SANFL sides last year as it was all a complete unknown, in the end it was probably an over reaction but what were they to do? I'd imagine 2021 has far more planning and contingency plans in place if there were to be another AFL hub situation.
As each AwFuL linked club would have approximately half a full squad of SANFL players, is it possible that the Crows and Power reserves form into the one team, giving us a nine-team competition if Covid does intervene?
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 240 guests