by tigerpie » Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:58 am
by Booney » Fri Sep 08, 2023 10:01 am
by FlyingHigh » Fri Sep 08, 2023 10:10 am
by Booney » Fri Sep 08, 2023 10:12 am
by JK » Fri Sep 08, 2023 10:53 am
FlyingHigh wrote:Maynard will be suspended. Not because what he did was intentionally malicious but because the AFL won't want it to be seen to be okay and give the green light for future similar incidents where perhaps some intention might become part involved.
by Dutchy » Fri Sep 08, 2023 10:57 am
by amber_fluid » Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:00 am
Booney wrote:Can't do it yet, but Port $3 to make the GF and Carlton $6 to make the GF.
by amber_fluid » Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:02 am
Dutchy wrote:The argument will be if Maynard deliberately lower the shoulder into Brayshaw or was he protecting himself? Who the hell knows and good luck to the AFL either way this goes!
by Wedgie » Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:05 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by tigerpie » Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:06 am
Booney wrote:Conditions played no part in that shit fest. The rain had stopped and it wasn't slippery.
What did contribute to it was the umpiring, it was ( as usual ) completely different to minor round matches as evidenced from the very first holding the ball not paid against Lever in the opening minutes. The amount of congestion caused by missed free kicks was evident. What that also did was allow Collingwood, in particular, to set up behind the ball and slow Melbourne down. Couple that and it was a terrible spectacle.
by tigerpie » Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:11 am
Wedgie wrote:I only saw the last quarter and it was good to watch.
Maynard has to get several games. People get games for legal bumps and that was an illegal FAD any day of the week, onus is on the pressuring person to not touch the player after he disposes of it.
by Wedgie » Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:16 am
tigerpie wrote:Wedgie wrote:I only saw the last quarter and it was good to watch.
Maynard has to get several games. People get games for legal bumps and that was an illegal FAD any day of the week, onus is on the pressuring person to not touch the player after he disposes of it.
Precedent set with the Rioli? one last year when he poleaxed Rowell.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:35 am
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:Can't do it yet, but Port $3 to make the GF and Carlton $6 to make the GF.
Carlton v Power GF!
Bring it on.
by Vamos » Fri Sep 08, 2023 12:23 pm
Dutchy wrote:The argument will be if Maynard deliberately lower the shoulder into Brayshaw or was he protecting himself? Who the hell knows and good luck to the AFL either way this goes!
by MW » Fri Sep 08, 2023 12:28 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Dutchy wrote:The argument will be if Maynard deliberately lower the shoulder into Brayshaw or was he protecting himself? Who the hell knows and good luck to the AFL either way this goes!
I think the bigger issue for Brayshaw is how easily he was knocked out.
by Vamos » Fri Sep 08, 2023 12:32 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:Can't do it yet, but Port $3 to make the GF and Carlton $6 to make the GF.
Carlton v Power GF!
Bring it on.
by RB » Fri Sep 08, 2023 12:46 pm
by Armchair expert » Fri Sep 08, 2023 12:53 pm
RB wrote:Maynard will argue that the collision occurred after he attempted to smother Brayshaw's kick, and there was nothing he could do while he was in the air. The counterargument would be that if you're essentially jumping into someone in order to smother (rather than jumping straight up), you need to ensure you don't collect them high. I don't think it's anything greater than careless, but I reckon he'll cop a week.
by rd » Fri Sep 08, 2023 1:06 pm
Armchair expert wrote:RB wrote:Maynard will argue that the collision occurred after he attempted to smother Brayshaw's kick, and there was nothing he could do while he was in the air. The counterargument would be that if you're essentially jumping into someone in order to smother (rather than jumping straight up), you need to ensure you don't collect them high. I don't think it's anything greater than careless, but I reckon he'll cop a week.
In the regular season it would be
Classifiable Offences - Forceful Front On Contact
Careless - High impact - High Contact ----> 2 Weeks
However I don't see him getting any weeks
by Dutchy » Fri Sep 08, 2023 1:09 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |