AFL Finals Week 1

Talk on the national game
Post Reply
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by tigerpie »

Wasn't the greatest of games due to the conditions.
Absolutely pissed down during the warm up.

Very happy with our ability to ice the game when Melbourne had repeat entries.
Premiership footy.

Loving the hate for Collingwood, keep it coming.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64107
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8792 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Booney »

Conditions played no part in that shit fest. The rain had stopped and it wasn't slippery.

What did contribute to it was the umpiring, it was ( as usual ) completely different to minor round matches as evidenced from the very first holding the ball not paid against Lever in the opening minutes. The amount of congestion caused by missed free kicks was evident. What that also did was allow Collingwood, in particular, to set up behind the ball and slow Melbourne down. Couple that and it was a terrible spectacle.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4948
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:12 am
Has thanked: 99 times
Been thanked: 184 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by FlyingHigh »

Was a pretty intense finals-like first quarter, but then became a bit humdrum, and agree with some of the posters above, neither of those sides stood out to be premiership favourites.

While it was only a couple of minor round games as a sample, how critical has Petty's injury been in Melbourne's forward structure, and now add in Melksham.

Maynard will be suspended. Not because what he did was intentionally malicious but because the AFL won't want it to be seen to be okay and give the green light for future similar incidents where perhaps some intention might become part involved.

If Brisbane don't make the GF (and I don't think they will), then they have to wear the same stigma as Port in the early 2000's and 2020-21.

What are the odds for a Port/Carlton GF?
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64107
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8792 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Booney »

Can't do it yet, but Port $3 to make the GF and Carlton $6 to make the GF.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:11 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by JK »

FlyingHigh wrote:Maynard will be suspended. Not because what he did was intentionally malicious but because the AFL won't want it to be seen to be okay and give the green light for future similar incidents where perhaps some intention might become part involved.


Slightly different nature of incident, but if McCartin v McAdam is all sweet there’s grounds to argue the injury to Brayshaw is an unfortunate result of a genuine footballing action.
FUSC
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2936 times
Been thanked: 4838 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Dutchy »

The argument will be if Maynard deliberately lower the shoulder into Brayshaw or was he protecting himself? Who the hell knows and good luck to the AFL either way this goes!
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16426
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:18 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by amber_fluid »

Booney wrote:Can't do it yet, but Port $3 to make the GF and Carlton $6 to make the GF.


Carlton v Power GF!
Bring it on.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16426
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:18 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by amber_fluid »

Dutchy wrote:The argument will be if Maynard deliberately lower the shoulder into Brayshaw or was he protecting himself? Who the hell knows and good luck to the AFL either way this goes!


I think the bigger issue for Brayshaw is how easily he was knocked out.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
Posts: 51723
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 2153 times
Been thanked: 4093 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Wedgie »

I only saw the last quarter and it was good to watch.
Maynard has to get several games. People get games for legal bumps and that was an illegal FAD any day of the week, onus is on the pressuring person to not touch the player after he disposes of it.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by tigerpie »

Booney wrote:Conditions played no part in that shit fest. The rain had stopped and it wasn't slippery.

What did contribute to it was the umpiring, it was ( as usual ) completely different to minor round matches as evidenced from the very first holding the ball not paid against Lever in the opening minutes. The amount of congestion caused by missed free kicks was evident. What that also did was allow Collingwood, in particular, to set up behind the ball and slow Melbourne down. Couple that and it was a terrible spectacle.

Did you not see blokes slipping over all night?
Kicks getting shanked because the grounded foot shifts on contact.
Agreed, there were a few htb's missed but that's how finals are umpired.
You have to really earn free kicks in finals. I don't like it but it's always been the way.
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by tigerpie »

Wedgie wrote:I only saw the last quarter and it was good to watch.
Maynard has to get several games. People get games for legal bumps and that was an illegal FAD any day of the week, onus is on the pressuring person to not touch the player after he disposes of it.

Precedent set with the Rioli? one last year when he poleaxed Rowell.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
Posts: 51723
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 2153 times
Been thanked: 4093 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Wedgie »

tigerpie wrote:
Wedgie wrote:I only saw the last quarter and it was good to watch.
Maynard has to get several games. People get games for legal bumps and that was an illegal FAD any day of the week, onus is on the pressuring person to not touch the player after he disposes of it.

Precedent set with the Rioli? one last year when he poleaxed Rowell.

Not even close to similar nor a precedent. A marking contest is a lot different to making contact with a guy after he gets rid of the ball.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55280
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has thanked: 4976 times
Been thanked: 9056 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Lightning McQueen »

amber_fluid wrote:
Booney wrote:Can't do it yet, but Port $3 to make the GF and Carlton $6 to make the GF.


Carlton v Power GF!
Bring it on.

Both your teams, win/win
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
Vamos
League - Top 5
Posts: 2970
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 11:55 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Vamos »

Dutchy wrote:The argument will be if Maynard deliberately lower the shoulder into Brayshaw or was he protecting himself? Who the hell knows and good luck to the AFL either way this goes!


There is no argument, 1. Plays for a big V club, 2. MRO played for said big V club. We all know how this ends.
Whoops, there goes another year. Whoops, there goes another pint of beer.
MW
Coach
Posts: 14197
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 2804 times
Been thanked: 2098 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by MW »

amber_fluid wrote:
Dutchy wrote:The argument will be if Maynard deliberately lower the shoulder into Brayshaw or was he protecting himself? Who the hell knows and good luck to the AFL either way this goes!


I think the bigger issue for Brayshaw is how easily he was knocked out.


95kg coming down on the side of your head...hardly an easy knock out.
Vamos
League - Top 5
Posts: 2970
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 11:55 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Vamos »

amber_fluid wrote:
Booney wrote:Can't do it yet, but Port $3 to make the GF and Carlton $6 to make the GF.


Carlton v Power GF!
Bring it on.


More chance of winning div 1 tomorrow night. Port would need to beat the Pies at the G and Carlton would need to beat the Brions at the Gabba.
Whoops, there goes another year. Whoops, there goes another pint of beer.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by RB »

Maynard will argue that the collision occurred after he attempted to smother Brayshaw's kick, and there was nothing he could do while he was in the air. The counterargument would be that if you're essentially jumping into someone in order to smother (rather than jumping straight up), you need to ensure you don't collect them high. I don't think it's anything greater than careless, but I reckon he'll cop a week.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
Armchair expert
Coach
Posts: 13553
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 8:18 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Ports
Has thanked: 432 times
Been thanked: 2003 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Armchair expert »

RB wrote:Maynard will argue that the collision occurred after he attempted to smother Brayshaw's kick, and there was nothing he could do while he was in the air. The counterargument would be that if you're essentially jumping into someone in order to smother (rather than jumping straight up), you need to ensure you don't collect them high. I don't think it's anything greater than careless, but I reckon he'll cop a week.


In the regular season it would be
Classifiable Offences - Forceful Front On Contact
Careless - High impact - High Contact ----> 2 Weeks


However I don't see him getting any weeks
dammit pantera this beer is warm
User avatar
rd
Under 18s
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:07 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Double Blue Heaven.
Been thanked: 34 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by rd »

Armchair expert wrote:
RB wrote:Maynard will argue that the collision occurred after he attempted to smother Brayshaw's kick, and there was nothing he could do while he was in the air. The counterargument would be that if you're essentially jumping into someone in order to smother (rather than jumping straight up), you need to ensure you don't collect them high. I don't think it's anything greater than careless, but I reckon he'll cop a week.


In the regular season it would be
Classifiable Offences - Forceful Front On Contact
Careless - High impact - High Contact ----> 2 Weeks


However I don't see him getting any weeks


Non Vic-based player gets 3 weeks
Vic-based player gets 1 week which then gets overturned after a review.
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2936 times
Been thanked: 4838 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Finals Week 1

Post by Dutchy »

We all know how much the AFL love a negotiated outcome, it should be 0 or 3 weeks, but watch him get 1 week and be available for GF if they make it
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 192 guests