SANFL Finals Week 2

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
Mr Fuller
Reserves
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:16 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 135 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by Mr Fuller »

Booney wrote:For fear of copping some anti-Port wrath I'll comment on the Eagles.

Again, September comes around and bar Wundke the Eagles side looked incapable of hitting the scoreboard. Clearly a key forward short of where they need to be, perhaps two and the ruck division looks light on, especially with Hayes backing up the first choice ruckman.

Goes to show how the Eagles are super hard to beat at Woodville, I think it's the hardest place to go and win, but get them away from Woodville in the pressure cooker of finals and they're a different unit.

From what I saw yesterday I expect Sturt to make it through to play Port in a fortnight.


Probably a reasonable assessment there Booney. J Hayes looked really good in the first half of the season as a leading forward alongside Wundke. Fully of confidence, grabbing everything around him. The injury to Borholm forced Godden to play him as our key ruck (until the emergence of West) and then when West did come into the side Godden still played him as a second ruck. They guy would be lucky to be pushing 191cm. From the moment he started being used a ruckman his confidence has nosedived and his output has diminished and this experience has probably delayed his emergence as a key forward by 12 months or more.

It is clear that our gameplan changes from the minor round matches to how we play in the finals. During the season, we have multiple scoring options and our midfielders and small forwards in particular kick at least three quarters of our goals. In the finals matches where we have 'folded' in recent times Wundke has been responsible for kicking 90% of the goals. We look for him on every occasion because our midfielders and small forwards have all had very poor matches and contribute nothing. Players like McGregor and Johansson must be kicking 4 goals between them if we are to have any hope. And players like Boyd, Hall, Petrenko etc need to get 2-3 on the scoreboard. We can't be leaving it all to one player.

It starts in the centre. Our ruckman needs to get their hands to the ball. West will be a good player but its clear he is not ready yet. Borholm (if fit) must come into the side.
VALE PARK
Under 18s
Posts: 660
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:32 am
Team: Melbourne
Team: Goodwood Saints
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by VALE PARK »

Lowest first and second semi final crowd since ?
Or lowest ever?
As I have suggested before, could be the last Adelaide Oval finals (except the GF).
SANFuL got to do a lot lot better in promoting and programming the games during the year.
I was at Campbelltown Oval on Saturday and there could have been 1000 attending the ammos second semi final!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47501
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4842 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by Dutchy »

Lucky for the SANFL Sturt have been in finals weeks 1,2 and now 3 otherwise the crowds would be around 5k.
matt35
Under 18s
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:50 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Boston
Location: Darwin
Has thanked: 513 times
Been thanked: 51 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by matt35 »

9,029 is the exact same number as last year's week 2 crowd.
No Surrender!
GMcG
Under 16s
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:58 pm
Has thanked: 221 times
Been thanked: 45 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by GMcG »

Wedgie wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Oh well, looks like I now have another weekend free. I normally go to the GF but not this year, hopefully plenty of other neutrals boycott it aswell

I'll be going, first Grand Final since 2013!
Yes, I am getting paid. :lol:

I'd call in sick :)

Nah, it'll be the last bit of work I do before my Thailand trip and will mean another 5000 baht for beers. Or 5 chicks of I wasn't taking my girlfriend. :lol:

just make sure you don't give this one the clap :D
Ronnie
Reserves
Posts: 824
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 95 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by Ronnie »

matt35 wrote:9,029 is the exact same number as last year's week 2 crowd.


That would've been the Sturt-Centrals crowd and as one of the attendees I felt like it was enough to give the game some atmosphere and noise.
Sitting there I thought how good it was for the players involved to play at the venue. It was fitting for the occasion.
Certainly that crowd at Adelaide Oval was far better atmosphere than the same crowd at football park. Below about 8,000 you start to feel the emptiness a bit which will be next week's prelim.
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:11 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by JK »

Image
FUSC
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Team: Central District
Location: On the prairie
Has thanked: 381 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by Apachebulldog »

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH another nail in the coffin of the SANFL.

Kudos to the six clubs who voted yes and a special thanks to the SANFL for its endorsement.

Well done by all.

Bravo.
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by Jim05 »

JK wrote:Image

Much better to be killed off and taken over :)
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12500
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by Pseudo »

JK wrote:Image


The irony is too obvious. Surely that lot is taking the mickey.

What did the Eagles' banner say?

"Our finals campaign
is like a bad dream
But we didn't have to merge
with an AFL team"
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20534
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 2324 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by am Bays »

Managed to almost fill a Green Bin full of weeds yesterday afternoon.

Next weekend start on the backyard, bit of pruning too maybe....

*sigh*

:oops: :oops:
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by therisingblues »

Dogwatcher wrote:Don't know a figure, but much larger in the first game than the second. Says a lot about Sturt's drawing power.

A lot of Dogs fans around where we were on the hill. A very good atmosphere I thought, with both sets of fans in full voice.
At the start of the second game the crowd had dwindled in size but could there was still plenty of Double Blue and Central gear about the place. We left at half time, I think there were not many Sturt or Dogs fans that stuck around after that.

As for the game itself. I thought the Dogs had more of the ball, and probably dominated for longer patches, but wayward kicking cost them. Sturt finished off the work much better when we had the ball. That was the only difference. Had the Dogs won I reckon they'd have given the flag a bit of a shake.

We survive for at least one more week.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Team: Central District
Location: On the prairie
Has thanked: 381 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by Apachebulldog »

therisingblues wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:Don't know a figure, but much larger in the first game than the second. Says a lot about Sturt's drawing power.

A lot of Dogs fans around where we were on the hill. A very good atmosphere I thought, with both sets of fans in full voice.
At the start of the second game the crowd had dwindled in size but could there was still plenty of Double Blue and Central gear about the place. We left at half time, I think there were not many Sturt or Dogs fans that stuck around after that.

As for the game itself. I thought the Dogs had more of the ball, and probably dominated for longer patches, but wayward kicking cost them. Sturt finished off the work much better when we had the ball. That was the only difference. Had the Dogs won I reckon they'd have given the flag a bit of a shake.

We survive for at least one more week.



Correct summation my friend Blues deserved the win better team all year great contest great atmosphere.

Also stayed to watch the Interlopers play Eagles until half time thats all i could stomach knew the Eagles would get smashed cos of the way they played against us in the last game at Woodville.

Game was all over at quarter time no atmosphere at all unless you were a Power Reserves fan or a Pseudo Magpie.

Having the AFL INTERLOPERS involved has really benefitted our SANFL. NOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT !!

NO AFL IN THE SANFL.

In other words FAAARKK OFFF and find another comp.
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16430
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:18 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by amber_fluid »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
DOC wrote:9029

Semi-finals drawing under 10k would be a concern


It's a concern but not a surprise especially with both games being televised.
I thought they may have got close to 15k but less than 10k is poor.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Imperials
Location: West Beach
Has thanked: 489 times
Been thanked: 401 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by bulldogproud »

It was also up against the Royal Show this year - I don't think the show had included a second Sunday in previous years. This may have had some slight impact, with the weather being at its best compared to the rest of Show week.
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62523
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14200 times
Been thanked: 5168 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

bulldogproud wrote:It was also up against the Royal Show this year - I don't think the show had included a second Sunday in previous years. This may have had some slight impact, with the weather being at its best compared to the rest of Show week.
Cheers


Show started having 2 weekends I think in the last year or so.
I was at the Show yesty and there was hardly anyone there.
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
prowling panther
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:04 am
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Hectorville
Has thanked: 90 times
Been thanked: 28 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by prowling panther »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
bulldogproud wrote:It was also up against the Royal Show this year - I don't think the show had included a second Sunday in previous years. This may have had some slight impact, with the weather being at its best compared to the rest of Show week.
Cheers


Show started having 2 weekends I think in the last year or so.
I was at the Show yesty and there was hardly anyone there.



I don't think the show had any impact on the crowd, if your team was playing in the finals you would have been there, if your team was not in contention, then the show or a bin full of weeds would have been a better alternative. Prelim and Grand Final will be better attended by footy fans of SANFL.
I wish my remembering was as good as my forgetting
wedgetail
Reserves
Posts: 791
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:46 pm
Team: Eagles
Location: The Eagle Eye over Oval Ave
Has thanked: 255 times
Been thanked: 112 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by wedgetail »

Mr Fuller wrote:
Booney wrote:For fear of copping some anti-Port wrath I'll comment on the Eagles.

Again, September comes around and bar Wundke the Eagles side looked incapable of hitting the scoreboard. Clearly a key forward short of where they need to be, perhaps two and the ruck division looks light on, especially with Hayes backing up the first choice ruckman.

Goes to show how the Eagles are super hard to beat at Woodville, I think it's the hardest place to go and win, but get them away from Woodville in the pressure cooker of finals and they're a different unit.

From what I saw yesterday I expect Sturt to make it through to play Port in a fortnight.


Probably a reasonable assessment there Booney. J Hayes looked really good in the first half of the season as a leading forward alongside Wundke. Fully of confidence, grabbing everything around him. The injury to Borholm forced Godden to play him as our key ruck (until the emergence of West) and then when West did come into the side Godden still played him as a second ruck. They guy would be lucky to be pushing 191cm. From the moment he started being used a ruckman his confidence has nosedived and his output has diminished and this experience has probably delayed his emergence as a key forward by 12 months or more.

It is clear that our gameplan changes from the minor round matches to how we play in the finals. During the season, we have multiple scoring options and our midfielders and small forwards in particular kick at least three quarters of our goals. In the finals matches where we have 'folded' in recent times Wundke has been responsible for kicking 90% of the goals. We look for him on every occasion because our midfielders and small forwards have all had very poor matches and contribute nothing. Players like McGregor and Johansson must be kicking 4 goals between them if we are to have any hope. And players like Boyd, Hall, Petrenko etc need to get 2-3 on the scoreboard. We can't be leaving it all to one player.

It starts in the centre. Our ruckman needs to get their hands to the ball. West will be a good player but its clear he is not ready yet. Borholm (if fit) must come into the side.


Agree with your comments Mr F, our scoring dries up in the heat of finals pressure. During the season we have a very even spread of scorers and without knowing exact figures, Johansen would be in the 20's, N Hayes near 20 and Wundke 30's. McGregor's goal output has been down on previous seasons though. Lewis gets a look at the goals at least once or twice a game but doesn't often convert, same with Pup.
Borholm is a must even if only 80% fit. We can match sturt if we bring intensity and quick ball movement as per earlier in the year. If not, another inglorious finals exit. I love Godden but his finals win/loss ratio would only be 50% at best- cue Spelly or Phil H.
There is no doubt we need Toumpas, Ellis-Yeolman and a few others in 2018 to bolster a squad that is thin and probably is about the 4th or 5th best team in the wash up of the 2017 season. Still hoping for a miracle though!
2011 we got destroyed by norwood in the qualifying final and still won the flag so here's hoping!
Luck is where opportunity meets preparation
hollywood7477
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1393
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:42 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: West Coast Eagles
Has thanked: 56 times
Been thanked: 79 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by hollywood7477 »

Mr Fuller wrote:Pathetic eagles. First quarter our foot and hand skills were below SANFL standard, we fumbled and constantly bombed the ball forward without looking. I thought Poole, Thompson and Stewart were the only ones who could hold there heads up high this match.

Performances of West (absolutely destroyed in the ruck from the opening bounce), Johanson (lack of desperation and pressure when not wit the ball), J Hayes (non-existent mirroring weeks of sub-standard performances) and Giuffreda (worst first half of his career) were very concerning.

Bornholm MUST come into the side next week replacing either West or J Hayes. Not really sure what other changes we can make as there hasn't really been anyone in the reserves knocking down the door throughout the season.


I see Johansen hasnt changed. Only works hard if he can look good and then he will bitch if things dont go his way. The kid is a cancer. Players were glad to see the back of him when he quit Glenelg because he thought he deserved more money and believed he was geting screwed over by the club. The amount of times he would bag all the Glenel;g coaches during drills
GMcG
Under 16s
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:58 pm
Has thanked: 221 times
Been thanked: 45 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Finals Week 2

Post by GMcG »

hollywood7477 wrote:
Mr Fuller wrote:Pathetic eagles. First quarter our foot and hand skills were below SANFL standard, we fumbled and constantly bombed the ball forward without looking. I thought Poole, Thompson and Stewart were the only ones who could hold there heads up high this match.

Performances of West (absolutely destroyed in the ruck from the opening bounce), Johanson (lack of desperation and pressure when not wit the ball), J Hayes (non-existent mirroring weeks of sub-standard performances) and Giuffreda (worst first half of his career) were very concerning.

Bornholm MUST come into the side next week replacing either West or J Hayes. Not really sure what other changes we can make as there hasn't really been anyone in the reserves knocking down the door throughout the season.


I see Johansen hasnt changed. Only works hard if he can look good and then he will bitch if things dont go his way. The kid is a cancer. Players were glad to see the back of him when he quit Glenelg because he thought he deserved more money and believed he was geting screwed over by the club. The amount of times he would bag all the Glenel;g coaches during drills

apparently a LOT of the current playing group does!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 204 guests