Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
- Cambridge Clarrie
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 1702
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 9:33 am
- Team: Sturt
- Location: Asleep in the Unley Oval pirate ship...
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
Sad state of affairs.
South supporters would have been on a high about a month ago and now look what's happened...
Huge changes necessary off field before anything positive happens for the club.
If it's true that the board didn't like Jack's coaching style/tactics, then this is a disgrace. He should have been given at least a season to prove he could set them in the right direction.
South supporters would have been on a high about a month ago and now look what's happened...
Huge changes necessary off field before anything positive happens for the club.
If it's true that the board didn't like Jack's coaching style/tactics, then this is a disgrace. He should have been given at least a season to prove he could set them in the right direction.
"They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head"
- doggies4eva
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2473
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
- Team: Central District
- Location: In front of a computer screen
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Sad state of affairs.
South supporters would have been on a high about a month ago and now look what's happened...
Huge changes necessary off field before anything positive happens for the club.
If it's true that the board didn't like Jack's coaching style/tactics, then this is a disgrace. He should have been given at least a season to prove he could set them in the right direction.
I agree with you Cambridge.
While I am no fan of Jack's I don't agree with sacking coaches mid-season. The board only appointed him a short time ago. Didn't they consider his coaching style before appointing him?
We used to be good :-(
- evans01
- Under 16s
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:49 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
doggies4eva wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Sad state of affairs.
South supporters would have been on a high about a month ago and now look what's happened...
Huge changes necessary off field before anything positive happens for the club.
If it's true that the board didn't like Jack's coaching style/tactics, then this is a disgrace. He should have been given at least a season to prove he could set them in the right direction.
I agree with you Cambridge.
While I am no fan of Jack's I don't agree with sacking coaches mid-season. The board only appointed him a short time ago. Didn't they consider his coaching style before appointing him?
love of hate jack, he has the score on the board, he is a tough coach and expects alot but isnt that wot its all about?....
the coach must always (in most cases) have the finally say..........sure you have to consider all aspects of the club but at the end of the day the committee knows how he coaches and his level of expectation and if the committee hadnt considered that prior to his appointment they are bigger fools than wot they have already shown to be......
Lee Marvin, Wanderin Star, "Home is made for coming from, for dreams of going to"
- Squawk
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4665
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 2:00 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Location: Coopers Stadium
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
doggies4eva wrote:While I am no fan of Jack's I don't agree with sacking coaches mid-season. The board only appointed him a short time ago. Didn't they consider his coaching style before appointing him?
On the contrary, Jack was headhunted. He spent a lot of time thinking about it and even sought guidance from Jimmy Deane before committing to the job. South probably spent more time chasing Jack than the time they ended up having him for.
Question is, who put Jack's name up in the first instance? And then who supported it - certainly the past players on the (new) Board IIRC.
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
Could the door open for Trevor Potts...
Took a 2's side full of local lads to a GF last year and was apparently respected by all until also told he would not be required the following season, wonder if this decision was made by the same board?
I hear all players backed Jack 100% and were also gutted last night at the announcement
Took a 2's side full of local lads to a GF last year and was apparently respected by all until also told he would not be required the following season, wonder if this decision was made by the same board?
I hear all players backed Jack 100% and were also gutted last night at the announcement
- Squawk
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4665
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 2:00 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Location: Coopers Stadium
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
qwerty wrote:Could the door open for Trevor Potts...
Took a 2's side full of local lads to a GF last year and was apparently respected by all until also told he would not be required the following season, wonder if this decision was made by the same board?
I hear all players backed Jack 100% and were also gutted last night at the announcement
Trevor Potts wouldn't go back if that's the case.
If the players back Jack 100%, would they refuse to play their next game vs the Dogs and save some petrol money?
Re the timing, it is also curious that this has occurred at the bye for the State Game - gives the players extra time to 'accept' a new coach one would think.
The more I think about it, the more it sounds like a planned series of events where Jack has resigned as a result before he was pushed - although Pyman was pushed and....ker ching! I wonder if Jack has been offered some extra coin to sign a settlement requiring confidentiality?
- doggies4eva
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2473
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
- Team: Central District
- Location: In front of a computer screen
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
Maybe the players withdrew their 100% support when they had to train next weekend.
Surprising they wanted next weekend off when they are likely to get September off
Surprising they wanted next weekend off when they are likely to get September off
We used to be good :-(
- therisingblues
- Coach
- Posts: 6190
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Carlton
- Team: Hope Valley
- Location: Fukuoka
- Has thanked: 369 times
- Been thanked: 514 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
Squawk wrote:Re the timing, it is also curious that this has occurred at the bye for the State Game - gives the players extra time to 'accept' a new coach one would think.
The more I think about it, the more it sounds like a planned series of events where Jack has resigned as a result before he was pushed - although Pyman was pushed and....ker ching! I wonder if Jack has been offered some extra coin to sign a settlement requiring confidentiality?
Could be as you say. But remember that "Idle hands are the Devil's tools." This time off for the state game probably presented itself as a time where the South Board, feeling they had time to screw about with no game on this weekend, decided that it'd be a good time to confront the coach about "issues" (very South word that). That's just another point of view.
The way I am reading this all, is after hearing the board's opinion, Jack (as mentioned earlier) probably didn't have the patience of his youth to put up with the criticism.
Where to now for South?
So many board changes, so many upheavals, so little success. I think we should at least wait for the official version before doing the diagnosis, but you gotta feel for those fans that go week in week out, and those that support them from around the world.
P.S Rushby I don't know how removing the cars, which have been allowed around the ground for two seasons, will somehow address a mediocrity that has been going on for over one hundred years.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
-
mal
- Coach
- Posts: 32330
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:45 pm
- Has thanked: 2711 times
- Been thanked: 2993 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
G wrote:The late mail is Jack Cahill has pulled or is about to pull the pin on the Panthers.
ps. Dont forget I was 24 hours ahead of the media when Pyman got the flick.![]()
![]()
Anyone heard or knows similar ?
Theres one thing Ive learnt over the years
When our G has a scoop
He is always right
What does the SA saga mean
=
Good coaches at bad clubs can fail
for example
BLIGHT/ST KILDA
CAHILL/SOUTH
Both are strong willed old school type coaches
They have gotten most clubs up and running in thier coaching careers
But when at SA/SK they had problems
-
smac
- Coach
- Posts: 13092
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:19 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Salisbury
- Location: Golden Grove
- Has thanked: 168 times
- Been thanked: 233 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
That all depends on motivation of the coach and the culture of the club Mal.
CD appointed Kerly in the late 80's, he raped the club financially and left it in a worse state on the field than when he arrived. Luckily Alan Stewart had been waiting in the wings for about 10 years and took over on the cheap.
After Kerley, the club wanted to change and learnt from past mistakes. StK and SA have yet to act like this is what they want (lots of talk, little action).
CD appointed Kerly in the late 80's, he raped the club financially and left it in a worse state on the field than when he arrived. Luckily Alan Stewart had been waiting in the wings for about 10 years and took over on the cheap.
After Kerley, the club wanted to change and learnt from past mistakes. StK and SA have yet to act like this is what they want (lots of talk, little action).
- am Bays
- Coach
- Posts: 20534
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Location: The back bar at Lennies
- Has thanked: 192 times
- Been thanked: 2324 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
Gee isn't this thread an interesting read in hindsight....
http://www.safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10563&start=0
http://www.safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10563&start=0
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
-
TigerBoss
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:59 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Richmond
- Team: Lock
- Location: Snout's Bar!
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
If South are smart they will approach Burgess, who is currently an assistant under Andy Collins at West. He is always in the final few candidates when league coaching jobs come up, and had a go at coaching a league side when Peter Simmons left the Bay a few years back.
Is 2009 the year of the Tiger?
- Pseudo
- Coach
- Posts: 12500
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Marion
- Location: enculez-vous
- Been thanked: 1712 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Gee isn't this thread an interesting read in hindsight....
http://www.safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10563&start=0
No kidding - strawb and blacky's old avatars feature prominently

Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
-
Rotter
- Under 18s
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:33 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
I'm sure we've all got our own sources but mine has steadfastly claimed that the ex-players in Kappler, Buttler, Naley & Honour have been stirring the pot with Clay Sampson adding another to his buckle along with Pyman. I'm not suggesting their concerns were or weren't warranted because I don't know what exactly Jack has done to attract criticism but those blokes certainly have alot to answer for in this case. If he hasn't already, Sampson will take the reigns for the rest of the year. The only positive from that is he will finally know what Pyman and Cahill have had to contend with at a playing and Board level.
- Squawk
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4665
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 2:00 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Location: Coopers Stadium
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
-
TigerBoss
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:59 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Richmond
- Team: Lock
- Location: Snout's Bar!
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
Sampson and Torney should NOT even be considered as replacement for Cahill.
Is 2009 the year of the Tiger?
- locky801
- Coach
- Posts: 60831
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:11 pm
- Location: working all around Australia and loving it
- Has thanked: 4872 times
- Been thanked: 1566 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
Time will reveal all no doubt however I really feel for the South supporters, yes I know we all have a go and say that there is only a handful of them but we know there is more than that. How many more years do these totally faithful supporters have to put up with all the crap that they get served up by this footy club, everytime there appears to be some light at the end of that very very long dark tunnel along comes another controversy. How these people remain loyal to their club is beyond me, they as a group deserve better, lets hope for their sake all the wrongs start to disappear and there is a brighter future for the SAFC and to give something for their hard done by supporters to cheer about
It is a pity that their footy club does not have the hard resolve these supporters do
It is a pity that their footy club does not have the hard resolve these supporters do
Life is about moments, Create them
- pipers
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:35 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Adelaide Lutheran
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
therisingblues wrote:
P.S Rushby I don't know how removing the cars, which have been allowed around the ground for two seasons, will somehow address a mediocrity that has been going on for over one hundred years.
Karl Benz invented the motor car in 1885. South haven't had any sustained success of note since the 1890s...
You make the connection.
I know I have...
"loyalty is dead"
- westcoastpanther
- Coach
- Posts: 5489
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:27 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Boston
- Location: Weipa
- Has thanked: 66 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
locky801 wrote:Time will reveal all no doubt however I really feel for the South supporters, yes I know we all have a go and say that there is only a handful of them but we know there is more than that. How many more years do these totally faithful supporters have to put up with all the crap that they get served up by this footy club, everytime there appears to be some light at the end of that very very long dark tunnel along comes another controversy. How these people remain loyal to their club is beyond me, they as a group deserve better, lets hope for their sake all the wrongs start to disappear and there is a brighter future for the SAFC and to give something for their hard done by supporters to cheer about![]()
It is a pity that their footy club does not have the hard resolve these supporters do
We remain loyal because if we didn't follow South we wouldn't follow SANFL......
Hi, My name is Ron 'Bluey' Dunn. Did you know I played in the 61 & 62 Tasman Premiership sides....
- saintal
- Coach
- Posts: 5887
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:31 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: St Kilda
- Location: Adelaide Hills
- Has thanked: 379 times
- Been thanked: 488 times
- Contact:
Re: Jack to PULL THE PIN ?
TigerBoss wrote:Sampson and Torney should NOT even be considered as replacement for Cahill.
Agree with you on this.
Not sure how many options are open to the club though
SAFC- 62 years...
StKFC- 60 years..
StKFC- 60 years..
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 239 guests
