T20 series V England

Squids · Post by **Squids** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 8:20 pm

NO CHANNEL 9 YOU ******* MUPPETTS, THERE WAS NO CONFUSION ABOUT THAT DECISION WITH PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY HAVE A CLUE. HOW THE **** YOU CAN BE SO INCOMPETENT DEFIES BELIEF. YOU ARE ALL A TOTAL EMBARRASSMENT. LEARN THE RULES INSTEAD OF FAPPING OVER YOUR FAVOURITE PLAYERS. PATHETIC.

Dogmatic · Post by **Dogmatic** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 8:26 pm

Squids wrote:NO CHANNEL 9 YOU ******* MUPPETTS, THERE WAS NO CONFUSION ABOUT THAT DECISION WITH PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY HAVE A CLUE. HOW THE **** YOU CAN BE SO INCOMPETENT DEFIES BELIEF. YOU ARE ALL A TOTAL EMBARRASSMENT. LEARN THE RULES INSTEAD OF FAPPING OVER YOUR FAVOURITE PLAYERS. PATHETIC.

Agreed, so if you went by their logic if you went for a stumping and they had a foot planted at some stage they would be not out even though at the time the bails were removed they weren't within the crease it would be not out?
Shame commentators shame.

steakn · Post by **steakn** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 8:40 pm

I think Hazelwoods figures really flattered him tonight. In my opinion he's not up to this level yet and especially not bowling at the death.
Imagine if a noted batsman was at the crease in the last over.

Starc was great.
Muirhead was great
White & Maxwell were ok

Jury is still out on Coulter-Nile, his best is good, but still too many lapses.
Hazelwood very lucky I think

whufc · Post by **whufc** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:05 pm

Wow White has played some impressive cricket shots so far this innings

Stumps · Post by **Stumps** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:18 pm

steakn wrote:I think Hazelwoods figures really flattered him tonight. In my opinion he's not up to this level yet and especially not bowling at the death.
Imagine if a noted batsman was at the crease in the last over.

Starc was great.
Muirhead was great
White & Maxwell were ok

Jury is still out on Coulter-Nile, his best is good, but still too many lapses.
Hazelwood very lucky I think

Well said

tigerpie · Post by **tigerpie** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:21 pm

Squids wrote:NO CHANNEL 9 YOU ******* MUPPETTS, THERE WAS NO CONFUSION ABOUT THAT DECISION WITH PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY HAVE A CLUE. HOW THE **** YOU CAN BE SO INCOMPETENT DEFIES BELIEF. YOU ARE ALL A TOTAL EMBARRASSMENT. LEARN THE RULES INSTEAD OF FAPPING OVER YOUR FAVOURITE PLAYERS. PATHETIC.

ABSOLUTE HACKS!
Slater seems like he gets paid by the word.
Nicholas is the same.....frickin annoying!

Dogmatic · Post by **Dogmatic** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:36 pm

Hodge must be pretty pissed with a hack like Maxwell batting ahead of him.

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:38 pm

Dogmatic wrote:Hodge must be pretty pissed with a hack like Maxwell batting ahead of him.

The No show put on his usuall poor effort did he?

Dogmatic · Post by **Dogmatic** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:44 pm

Hasn't anyone told you not to ask the question you already know the answer to?

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:54 pm

Dogmatic wrote:Hasn't anyone told you not to ask the question you already know the answer to?

Out at dinner so havnt seen any of it.
Was just an educated guess he spudded up as its just the norm for him. What number did the dud come in?

Squids · Post by **Squids** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:57 pm

Jim05 wrote:
Dogmatic wrote:Hasn't anyone told you not to ask the question you already know the answer to?

Out at dinner so havnt seen any of it.
Was just an educated guess he spudded up as its just the norm for him. What number did the dud come in?

Maxwhirllllllllll did what the public wanted...got out to give Hodge a chance to bat. However much like in the test series Bailey performs in junk time. I can't stand the smug prick.

Dogmatic · Post by **Dogmatic** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:01 pm

Jim05 wrote:
Dogmatic wrote:Hasn't anyone told you not to ask the question you already know the answer to?

Out at dinner so havnt seen any of it.
Was just an educated guess he spudded up as its just the norm for him. What number did the dud come in?

3

wristwatcher · Post by **wristwatcher** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:04 pm

Great knock Georgey coming in after two quick wickets and the Poms with a sniff. Great Captains knock of 60 not out of off 28. Breath taking innings, I know I really enjoyed it.

mal · Post by **mal** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:16 pm

Jim05 wrote:
Dogmatic wrote:Hodge must be pretty pissed with a hack like Maxwell batting ahead of him.

The No show put on his usuall poor effort did he?

2 runs
5 balls
40.00 strike rate

Ruined his International Strike Rate
That strike rate has plummeted to a disgraceful 141.86

scoob · Post by **scoob** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:15 am

Absolute sh!te format of the game... Can't believe it is so popular.

Q. · Post by Q. » Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:35 am

I turned the channel over when Bradshaw climaxed over Hodge for the 57th time.

whufc · Post by **whufc** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:42 am

scoob wrote:Absolute sh!te format of the game... Can't believe it is so popular.

Agree,

Though its at a perfect timeslot for kids and is much cooler to watch than home and away for teenage boys.

Does give me the shits though most teenage boys would consider finch a better batsmen than bell and cook.

Has its place and if it keeps cricket financial for years to come then its a small price to pay.

I can enjoy game purely for the fact it's sport on TV but on dont hold it in any high regard and would never rate a player based on his t20 game

Squids · Post by **Squids** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:42 am

Q. wrote:I turned the channel over when Bradshaw climaxed over Hodge for the 57th time.

So you didn't see a ball?

stampy · Post by **stampy** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:40 pm

hazelwood is a typical nsw selection, how many got smacked off his last over in hobart?

mal · Post by **mal** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:12 pm

Magnificent Entertainment this 20/20 cricket
I can believe why so many people watch it

T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Re: T20 series V England

Who is online