The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

All discussions to do with the SANFL

The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Better - I'll follow my AFL side instead, though
1
1%
Better - I'll follow my current AFL and SANFL sides
11
14%
Better - I will follow it in the media though
0
No votes
Can't see any difference
6
8%
Worse - I will still go every week
17
22%
Worse - I will only boycott Crows/Port games though
16
21%
Worse - I will only follow it in the media
14
18%
Worse - Goodbye. I'm off to the Ammos or country footy!
13
17%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
Benchwarmer
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:03 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Callington
Location: Sunny Perth
Has thanked: 279 times
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by Benchwarmer »

Did the 'SANFL' music die for some people today or is it the start of something even better ... one way to find out is to ask the right people.

As Kerry Packer would say ... Speak!
The Apostle
League - Best 21
Posts: 1702
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:40 pm
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by The Apostle »

I voted for "Worse - Goodbye. I'm off to the Ammos or country footy!" only because there's no option for "Worse - Goodbye. I'm off to do something else in my life"...
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by Jim05 »

Worse but I love my club that much I cant give it up, born and raised in Norwood and been going to games for nearly 40 years, cant just give all that up.
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by therisingblues »

No option for me.
I'm now a Carlton fan, no longer a Crow.
Will continue to follow Sturt with a passion.
Hoping the league will be better but unsure.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
Blackwhite
Reserves
Posts: 827
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:52 am
Team: Payneham NU
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by Blackwhite »

Well since the maggies as we know them are dead I don't really have a choice. I'm done with the SANFL after 15 years. Very sad. Ammos for me!
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17954
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3236 times
Been thanked: 2578 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by woodublieve12 »

Shouldn't this poll be done after the 2014 season???
"Be curious, not judgmental""
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
Posts: 15328
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:23 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 942 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by RustyCage »

For me, the SANFL improves. Finally, the comp doesn't consist of 9 hybrid teams. Finally, Norwood are actually Norwood, Glenelg are actually Glenelg, Sturt are actually Sturt and so on and not artificially enhanced by players loaned from other teams
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
Panther Pack
Reserves
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:28 am
Team: South Adelaide
Location: Jimmy Dean's
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 152 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by Panther Pack »

pafc1870 wrote:For me, the SANFL improves. Finally, the comp doesn't consist of 9 hybrid teams. Finally, Norwood are actually Norwood, Glenelg are actually Glenelg, Sturt are actually Sturt and so on and not artificially enhanced by players loaned from other teams


Agree with that no more results decided by who has more AFL listed players playing for them. Better for the SANFL clubs to only have to deal with their own players, better for clubs, players and supporters.

However having 2 AFL reserves teams in the SANFL is worse for the league, but I'll just not watch those games and hope like crazy those teams don't feature in the SANFL finals!!!!!!
silent hour
Reserves
Posts: 895
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:49 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Hawthorn
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by silent hour »

pafc1870 wrote:For me, the SANFL improves. Finally, the comp doesn't consist of 9 hybrid teams. Finally, Norwood are actually Norwood, Glenelg are actually Glenelg, Sturt are actually Sturt and so on and not artificially enhanced by players loaned from other teams


Has to be better for what pafc1870 has said above.
sjt
League - Best 21
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:26 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by sjt »

I'll just attend home games, and the south away game. I won't be spending any money at the bendover clubs. Won't happen, but the perfect scenario would be a top four of cd, south, port, crows.
puppet arms
Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Carlton
Team: Glenunga
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by puppet arms »

Worse. Hate that the AFL clubs have got their way but I've always been Glenelg, always gone to the games and love taking the family and catching up with mates. Won't throw away that just because things didn't go my way. Doubt the motivation will be too high to go the Bays v Crows/Power 'support' teams though
User avatar
blues2002
Under 16s
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:14 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Gaza
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by blues2002 »

sjt wrote:I'll just attend home games, and the south away game. I won't be spending any money at the bendover clubs. Won't happen, but the perfect scenario would be a top four of cd, south, port, crows.


Will your club boycott the other games too? Nope, they are not that childish.
And I don't see the dogs dining out on a holier than thou attitude like yourself.
Make yourself useful and actually go on and do something constructive to oppose the crows/power in the SANFL if it means that much to you.
User avatar
areaman
Under 16s
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:30 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 31 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by areaman »

pafc1870 wrote:For me, the SANFL improves. Finally, the comp doesn't consist of 9 hybrid teams. Finally, Norwood are actually Norwood, Glenelg are actually Glenelg, Sturt are actually Sturt and so on and not artificially enhanced by players loaned from other teams

Rather than having nine teams topped up by players from 2 other teams (in a different comp) we will have 2 clubs topped up by players from the other 8 teams from the same comp.

Equality has been restored.
sjt
League - Best 21
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:26 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by sjt »

blues2002 wrote:
sjt wrote:I'll just attend home games, and the south away game. I won't be spending any money at the bendover clubs. Won't happen, but the perfect scenario would be a top four of cd, south, port, crows.


Will your club boycott the other games too? Nope, they are not that childish.
And I don't see the dogs dining out on a holier than thou attitude like yourself.
Make yourself useful and actually go on and do something constructive to oppose the crows/power in the SANFL if it means that much to you.

No my club won't boycott, unfortunately they don't have a real option. Admittedly, it doesn't mean that much to me that I try to have six boards voted out. It's easier just to boycott on principle, something I don't agree with. It could be constructive. If many who disagree with the vote didn't go, maybe then the bendover boards would have to listen.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12494
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by Pseudo »

The league will clearly be worse, with 8 dinkum teams forced to play scratch matches for underperforming AFL-listed players.

I will never - NEVER - attend a game featuring one of the two practice teams.

Keep up the struggle. Whether these arseholes are forcibly ejected from our competition or choose to leave for greener fields (when the AFL reserves comp starts up in a few years) I do not care - but keep up the pressure until they are gone.

SANFL FOREVER
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12494
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by Pseudo »

pafc1870 wrote:For me, the SANFL improves. Finally, the comp doesn't consist of 9 hybrid teams. Finally, Norwood are actually Norwood, Glenelg are actually Glenelg, Sturt are actually Sturt and so on and not artificially enhanced by players loaned from other teams

The above would still have been achieved if the Clowns and Smears had taken their players and set up shop in the ammos, a dedicated AFL reserves comp, or even in the SANFL reserves - with the added benefit that Our Sovereign Competition would not have been screwed over.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2936 times
Been thanked: 4838 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by Dutchy »

pafc1870 wrote:For me, the SANFL improves. Finally, the comp doesn't consist of 9 hybrid teams. Finally, Norwood are actually Norwood, Glenelg are actually Glenelg, Sturt are actually Sturt and so on and not artificially enhanced by players loaned from other teams


Aren't the PAM going to have Power players loaned to them? And aren't the Crows going to have top up players loaned to them?
SDK
League - Best 21
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 4:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Been thanked: 51 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by SDK »

Time will tell but no matter what I will be at the game screaming for my beloved Redlegs.
Interestingly a friend who came over from Melbourne for the GF and follows Collingwood said the VFL is still good to watch. He goes to Collingwood VFL games too and says they regularly get 3 - 4,000 people and that the die hards also follow their VFL reserves team.
Not comparing Crows supporters to Collingwood supporters but if the Crows and Port have around 2,000 die hards attending plus the SANFL die hards we may well see a crowd and interest increase.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by RB »

pafc1870 wrote:For me, the SANFL improves. Finally, the comp doesn't consist of 9 hybrid teams. Finally, Norwood are actually Norwood, Glenelg are actually Glenelg, Sturt are actually Sturt and so on and not artificially enhanced by players loaned from other teams

For me, having reserves teams in the SANFL is a farce, and is much, much worse than the status quo. Only someone interested in the AFL and almost nothing else would think it will improve.

I won't be attending next year, but enjoy watching your reserves league.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
SDK
League - Best 21
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 4:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Been thanked: 51 times
Contact:

Re: The SANFL in 2014 - Better or Worse?

Post by SDK »

When the Eagles start winning or are playing in GF with Port and Crows near the bottom you will be back RB !
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 292 guests