2020 Retirements and delistings / trade talk

[Jim05]

Looks like Crouch and Daniher getting band 1 compo

[stan]

Looks like Crouch and Daniher getting band 1 compo

It's sort of a way of giving a priority pick without having to really.

Good luck though to Adelaide, pushed the Saints and got it.

[gadj1976]

Would he consider a move back to GWS or perhaps Sydney?

I hope we do. We need the midfield depth and someone like him would fit in nicely. Soft tissue injuries are a concern but given Collingwood will continue to pay for him, it's a risk I'd take!

[Booney]

Would he consider a move back to GWS or perhaps Sydney?

I hope we do. We need the midfield depth and someone like him would fit in nicely. Soft tissue injuries are a concern but given Collingwood will continue to pay for him, it's a risk I'd take!

If he's on the reported $900k at the back end Collingwood might pay $250-300k tops, you want to bring in a bloke who has several question marks for $600k per year?

[whufc]

Would he consider a move back to GWS or perhaps Sydney?

I hope we do. We need the midfield depth and someone like him would fit in nicely. Soft tissue injuries are a concern but given Collingwood will continue to pay for him, it's a risk I'd take!

If he's on the reported $900k at the back end Collingwood might pay $250-300k tops, you want to bring in a bloke who has several question marks for $600k per year?

Is that really that much these days...…...especially given the reward is you possibly could have an A Grader. Genuine questions what type of players are on around that money....who is a $600k player at Port for example.

[Jim05]

Would he consider a move back to GWS or perhaps Sydney?

I hope we do. We need the midfield depth and someone like him would fit in nicely. Soft tissue injuries are a concern but given Collingwood will continue to pay for him, it's a risk I'd take!

If he's on the reported $900k at the back end Collingwood might pay $250-300k tops, you want to bring in a bloke who has several question marks for $600k per year?

He is a very good player and also with the minimum cap spend several teams are well under and literally have to burn their money.

[Booney]

Is that really that much these days...…...especially given the reward is you possibly could have an A Grader. Genuine questions what type of players are on around that money....who is a $600k player at Port for example.

Not many would consider Treloar an A grader though, his disposal by foot is very questionable.

Dixon would have been on $600k last deal to get him here, Boak would be close, in the future Rozee, Butters, Byrne-Jones will probably be.

[Booney]

Would he consider a move back to GWS or perhaps Sydney?

I hope we do. We need the midfield depth and someone like him would fit in nicely. Soft tissue injuries are a concern but given Collingwood will continue to pay for him, it's a risk I'd take!

If he's on the reported $900k at the back end Collingwood might pay $250-300k tops, you want to bring in a bloke who has several question marks for $600k per year?

He is a very good player and also with the minimum cap spend several teams are well under and literally have to burn their money.

We've got $750k plus the money Ebert, Westhoff and Watts were on.

[amber_fluid]

Would he consider a move back to GWS or perhaps Sydney?

I hope we do. We need the midfield depth and someone like him would fit in nicely. Soft tissue injuries are a concern but given Collingwood will continue to pay for him, it's a risk I'd take!

If he's on the reported $900k at the back end Collingwood might pay $250-300k tops, you want to bring in a bloke who has several question marks for $600k per year?

We’ve freed up money from Simpson and Kruezer retiring and hopefully Murphy at the end of next year so money isn’t an issue.
Worth the risk I reckon if Collingwood pay circa 30% of his wage next year.

[Jim05]

[quote="valleys07"]Would he consider a move back to GWS or perhaps Sydney?

I hope we do. We need the midfield depth and someone like him would fit in nicely. Soft tissue injuries are a concern but given Collingwood will continue to pay for him, it's a risk I'd take!

If he's on the reported $900k at the back end Collingwood might pay $250-300k tops, you want to bring in a bloke who has several question marks for $600k per year?

He is a very good player and also with the minimum cap spend several teams are well under and literally have to burn their money.

We've got $750k plus the money Ebert, Westhoff and Watts were on.[/quote]Yep, we have well over $2m now so can throw silly money at a few targets and see what eventuates. We can bank a bit but need to find a way to get to the cap floor
I’d be interested in Treloar if he was a couple of years younger, hence our interest in Dunkley

[amber_fluid]

Is that really that much these days...…...especially given the reward is you possibly could have an A Grader. Genuine questions what type of players are on around that money....who is a $600k player at Port for example.

Not many would consider Treloar an A grader though, his disposal by foot is very questionable.

Dixon would have been on $600k last deal to get him here, Boak would be close, in the future Rozee, Butters, Byrne-Jones will probably be.

Rockliff is on that too.

[The Bedge]

Treloar > Rockliff

[Booney]

Is that really that much these days...…...especially given the reward is you possibly could have an A Grader. Genuine questions what type of players are on around that money....who is a $600k player at Port for example.

Not many would consider Treloar an A grader though, his disposal by foot is very questionable.

Dixon would have been on $600k last deal to get him here, Boak would be close, in the future Rozee, Butters, Byrne-Jones will probably be.

Rockliff is on that too.

True, Jonas and Lycett probably not far off it either.

[amber_fluid]

Is that really that much these days...…...especially given the reward is you possibly could have an A Grader. Genuine questions what type of players are on around that money....who is a $600k player at Port for example.

Not many would consider Treloar an A grader though, his disposal by foot is very questionable.

Dixon would have been on $600k last deal to get him here, Boak would be close, in the future Rozee, Butters, Byrne-Jones will probably be.

Rockliff is on that too.

True, Jonas and Lycett probably not far off it either.

And Gray too.

[Booney]

Treloar > Rockliff

The market isn't saying that.

[Jim05]

Treloar > Rockliff

The market isn't saying that.

Every single club would take Treloar over Rockcliff and that’s no slight on Rockcliff.
The market is what it is

[Booney]

Treloar > Rockliff

The market isn't saying that.

Every single club would take Treloar over Rockcliff and that’s no slight on Rockcliff.
The market is what it is

Rockliff is 30, of course clubs would take a 26 year old over a 30 year old, but....Collingwood look like they can't give him away.

[Jim05]

Treloar > Rockliff

The market isn't saying that.

Every single club would take Treloar over Rockcliff and that’s no slight on Rockcliff.
The market is what it is

Rockliff is 30, of course clubs would take a 26 year old over a 30 year old, but....Collingwood look like they can't give him away.

Hard to give him away when trade season hasn’t started and they aren’t going to give him away for nothing still.
They will still want a top 10 pick minimum for him.

[Dutchy]

Id take Treloar in a hearbeat.

If Collingwood are so keen to get his salary out of their cap then they will have to take a discount in any trade negotiations also.

[tigerpie]

Treloar is a genuine A grader full stop.
Came back from hamstrings in both legs, at the same time shows he's also resilient.
Elite ball getter, may burn it by foot at times, but every team would want him on their list.
Including Richmond.