Dogwatcher wrote:Interesting that the BL&G was discussing its own salary cap last season.
There are a lot of things discussed Dogwatcher, it doesn't necessarily mean that any clubs agree with it.
The Salary Cap is still the most absurd thing to ever be introduced for country football in South Australia. Imagine owning for example a local real estate company- The Government contacts your business to dictate that you can only give your best employee $500 a week and under no circumstances you are to pay any employee anymore than that even though one or two salesmen are selling the most houses for their business. Yep... ridiculous really...
The BL&G was pushing for it. But I get your point.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
heater31 wrote: If you classify football players as 'employees' then you should be submitting paperwork to the ATO and paying superannuation. We are at the point the cash payments are equal to the weekly payments for a Monday to Friday job.
Can't have it both ways......you are either an amateur sports club or Sports business which one do you want to be?
And if the club does submit their paperwork and pay superannuation? All these ridiculous rules being put in place, first the points system, now a salary cap. Anything else before they completely kill country footy? Go and check the payments given out in Victoria for some country football clubs, allegedly most clubs start at $300k a year. That's an issue, not the SA Country Clubs who are paying $100k a year. One club in Victoria allegedly paid $480k this year.
The Geelong Football League has set it's Salary Cap at $150k. Given that the GFL is the No. 1 rated league in Vic Country, I think your starting price of $300k is way off the mark.
How do the Community Football League and South Australian Amateur Football League allow Amateur clubs to pay their players anyway? The Victorian Amaateur Football League still don't pay their players! AMATEUR= 1. One who engages in an art, science, study, or athletic activity as a pastime rather than as a profession. 2. An athlete who has never accepted money, or who accepts money under restrictions specified by a regulatory body, for participating in a competition.
Last edited by Bag & Sledge on Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Bag & Sledge wrote:How do the Community Football League and South Australian Amateur Football League allow Amateur clubs to pay their players anyway? The Victorian Amaateur Football League still don't pay their players! AMATEUR= 1. One who engages in an art, science, study, or athletic activity as a pastime rather than as a profession. 2. An athlete who has never accepted money, or who accepts money under restrictions specified by a regulatory body, for participating in a competition.
Bag & Sledge wrote:How do the Community Football League and South Australian Amateur Football League allow Amateur clubs to pay their players anyway? The Victorian Amaateur Football League still don't pay their players! AMATEUR= 1. One who engages in an art, science, study, or athletic activity as a pastime rather than as a profession. 2. An athlete who has never accepted money, or who accepts money under restrictions specified by a regulatory body, for participating in a competition.
You mean the Channel 9 Adelaide Football League?
Is this the reason for the name change so players could be paid?
Bag & Sledge wrote:How do the Community Football League and South Australian Amateur Football League allow Amateur clubs to pay their players anyway? The Victorian Amaateur Football League still don't pay their players! AMATEUR= 1. One who engages in an art, science, study, or athletic activity as a pastime rather than as a profession. 2. An athlete who has never accepted money, or who accepts money under restrictions specified by a regulatory body, for participating in a competition.
Bag & Sledge wrote:How do the Community Football League and South Australian Amateur Football League allow Amateur clubs to pay their players anyway? The Victorian Amaateur Football League still don't pay their players! AMATEUR= 1. One who engages in an art, science, study, or athletic activity as a pastime rather than as a profession. 2. An athlete who has never accepted money, or who accepts money under restrictions specified by a regulatory body, for participating in a competition.
Just reading through the Regs, when I, as a committee member buy the best on ground a beer in recognition of their great game I seem to be making a football payment which is not declared on the player's contract rendering both the player and the club liable to sanctions.
The drafting (which I understand needed to be as broad as possible) is problematic
What if i as a good team mate (this could be debated) decide to buy a box of beer for everyone to share after the game, is this deemed to be a payment?
If you don't like it, change it. If you don't want to change it, it can't be that bad!
Mythical Creature wrote:What if i as a good team mate (this could be debated) decide to buy a box of beer for everyone to share after the game, is this deemed to be a payment?
What if I bet the clubs 5 best players $5,000 that Carlton will beat Hawthorn when they play them?
Mythical Creature wrote:What if i as a good team mate (this could be debated) decide to buy a box of beer for everyone to share after the game, is this deemed to be a payment?
What if I bet the clubs 5 best players $5,000 that Carlton will beat Hawthorn when they play them?
Mythical Creature wrote:What if i as a good team mate (this could be debated) decide to buy a box of beer for everyone to share after the game, is this deemed to be a payment?
What if I bet the clubs 5 best players $5,000 that Carlton will beat Hawthorn when they play them?
Mythical Creature wrote:What if i as a good team mate (this could be debated) decide to buy a box of beer for everyone to share after the game, is this deemed to be a payment?
jo172 wrote:Just reading through the Regs, when I, as a committee member buy the best on ground a beer in recognition of their great game I seem to be making a football payment which is not declared on the player's contract rendering both the player and the club liable to sanctions.
It is to stop people cheating the system
First it's a beer Next it's a bottle of wine Next it's a case of Grange Next it's a vineyard...
jo172 wrote:Just reading through the Regs, when I, as a committee member buy the best on ground a beer in recognition of their great game I seem to be making a football payment which is not declared on the player's contract rendering both the player and the club liable to sanctions.
It is to stop people cheating the system
First it's a beer Next it's a bottle of wine Next it's a case of Jacob's Creek Next it's a vineyard...
jo172 wrote:Just reading through the Regs, when I, as a committee member buy the best on ground a beer in recognition of their great game I seem to be making a football payment which is not declared on the player's contract rendering both the player and the club liable to sanctions.
It is to stop people cheating the system
First it's a beer Next it's a bottle of vodka Next it's a case of UDL Cans Next it's a distillery...
Edited for accuracy for PNU members
Edited for our demographic and their awful taste in booze
