Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

All discussions to do with the SANFL
mal
Coach
Posts: 32312
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:15 pm
Has thanked: 2710 times
Been thanked: 2994 times
Contact:

Re: Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

Post by mal »

Quite an amazing occurrence in both Norwood's League and Seconds teams in this weekends Finals
Both games ended up with the same total goals scored by teams

NW 10-5
GL 8-16

NW 10-6
ST 8-9

The winners scored 10 goals the losers 8 goals in both matches
The losers in both games had more scoring shots

According to sources:
Norwoods League team had the unremarkable record of being the most inaccurate scoring team in the comp this season
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:54 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Pooraka
Been thanked: 5 times
Contact:

Re: Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

Post by HeartBeatsTrue »

wristwatcher wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:
Panther Pack wrote:
gossipgirl wrote:just wondering with the good weather what will the crowd figures be like for the double header ?


Reckon it could be over 20,000!!!

Good weather, New Stadium, could be massive!!!!!!!

With 4:40pm on a Saturday being the shittest of football timeslots then I reckon 5-6k will show up for both games.



Your going to be way off. It will be double that at least


Double that it was. :oops:
johntheclaret
Coach
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:09 am
Team: North Adelaide
Has thanked: 409 times
Been thanked: 580 times
Contact:

Re: Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

Post by johntheclaret »

HeartBeatsTrue wrote:
wristwatcher wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:
Panther Pack wrote:
Reckon it could be over 20,000!!!

Good weather, New Stadium, could be massive!!!!!!!

With 4:40pm on a Saturday being the shittest of football timeslots then I reckon 5-6k will show up for both games.



Your going to be way off. It will be double that at least


Double that it was. :oops:

Erm yes I was. You said 5-6 and 12 turned up
I thnk that's double :?
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:54 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Pooraka
Been thanked: 5 times
Contact:

Re: Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

Post by HeartBeatsTrue »

Jtr I don't think you understood my last post. Yes it was double and yes I got that wrong. Purely is due to the new AO.

Can't help but think it will justify to those that decided to let the afl reserves in, that they made the right choice.

Last year only 5k turned up to week 1.
SimonH
Under 18s
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:02 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 62 times
Contact:

Re: Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

Post by SimonH »

HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Jtr I don't think you understood my last post. Yes it was double and yes I got that wrong. Purely is due to the new AO.

Can't help but think it will justify to those that decided to let the afl reserves in, that they made the right choice.

Last year only 5k turned up to week 1.
I don't think that even the biggest AFL-boosters would claim that the intrusion of 2 AFL reserves teams, neither of whom played on the weekend, had any impact on attendances. It's not only AO, but really the big positive story of the 2014 SANFL season has been Sturt (drowned out by all of the AFL controversy). Even though across the last 15-to-50 years South have had less success than Sturt, it's been longer since Sturt made the finals, plus they've had to endure 2 wooden spoons in the meantime. And there are simply more Sturt supporters to bring out of the woodwork.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 130 times
Contact:

Re: Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

Post by CUTTERMAN »

SimonH wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Jtr I don't think you understood my last post. Yes it was double and yes I got that wrong. Purely is due to the new AO.

Can't help but think it will justify to those that decided to let the afl reserves in, that they made the right choice.

Last year only 5k turned up to week 1.
I don't think that even the biggest AFL-boosters would claim that the intrusion of 2 AFL reserves teams, neither of whom played on the weekend, had any impact on attendances. It's not only AO, but really the big positive story of the 2014 SANFL season has been Sturt (drowned out by all of the AFL controversy). Even though across the last 15-to-50 years South have had less success than Sturt, it's been longer since Sturt made the finals, plus they've had to endure 2 wooden spoons in the meantime. And there are simply more Sturt supporters to bring out of the woodwork.

Jeez, we've only had 3 years out of the finals, played in a GF in 2010.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
daysofourlives
Coach
Posts: 12082
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:05 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Angaston
Has thanked: 2691 times
Been thanked: 1788 times
Contact:

Re: Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

Post by daysofourlives »

CUTTERMAN wrote:
SimonH wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Jtr I don't think you understood my last post. Yes it was double and yes I got that wrong. Purely is due to the new AO.

Can't help but think it will justify to those that decided to let the afl reserves in, that they made the right choice.

Last year only 5k turned up to week 1.
I don't think that even the biggest AFL-boosters would claim that the intrusion of 2 AFL reserves teams, neither of whom played on the weekend, had any impact on attendances. It's not only AO, but really the big positive story of the 2014 SANFL season has been Sturt (drowned out by all of the AFL controversy). Even though across the last 15-to-50 years South have had less success than Sturt, it's been longer since Sturt made the finals, plus they've had to endure 2 wooden spoons in the meantime. And there are simply more Sturt supporters to bring out of the woodwork.

Jeez, we've only had 3 years out of the finals, played in a GF in 2010.


that would be 2009 mate.
South played finals in 2011? therefore statement is correct yeah?
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 130 times
Contact:

Re: Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

Post by CUTTERMAN »

Sorry meant 09, last finals was 2010.
My point is that we haven't been out of the spotlight for too long for people to have to come out of the woodwork.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:20 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: Qualifying Final - Norwood v Sturt @ AO (Sat T 30/8)

Post by therisingblues »

SimonH wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Jtr I don't think you understood my last post. Yes it was double and yes I got that wrong. Purely is due to the new AO.

Can't help but think it will justify to those that decided to let the afl reserves in, that they made the right choice.

Last year only 5k turned up to week 1.
I don't think that even the biggest AFL-boosters would claim that the intrusion of 2 AFL reserves teams, neither of whom played on the weekend, had any impact on attendances. It's not only AO, but really the big positive story of the 2014 SANFL season has been Sturt (drowned out by all of the AFL controversy). Even though across the last 15-to-50 years South have had less success than Sturt, it's been longer since Sturt made the finals, plus they've had to endure 2 wooden spoons in the meantime. And there are simply more Sturt supporters to bring out of the woodwork.

Yes, the first time in ages we've had Sturt, Norwood and Port filling the top three positions was always going to boost the figures.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 257 guests