Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)
Post Reply
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 394 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by stampy »

great shot by davey!
Go The Tiges!!!
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by bennymacca »

whufc wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
stan wrote:A deck like this takes discipline. If you go for a swing it will get you. Just dont be stupid and back to basics.

The pitch will not allow you to dominate the bowling for long. So back to basics, keep out the good balls, hit the bad ones.


I agree.

But... warner...


But what


I was always going to jinx him
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by stan »

bennymacca wrote:
whufc wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
stan wrote:A deck like this takes discipline. If you go for a swing it will get you. Just dont be stupid and back to basics.

The pitch will not allow you to dominate the bowling for long. So back to basics, keep out the good balls, hit the bad ones.


I agree.

But... warner...


But what


I was always going to jinx him


Well that was always going to happen I guess.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55280
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has thanked: 4976 times
Been thanked: 9056 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by Lightning McQueen »

Has the pitch settled down or are we just playing more mature shots?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by bennymacca »

Lightning McQueen wrote:Has the pitch settled down or are we just playing more mature shots?


From what i can gather from watching on my phone, we have batted pretty well. But we have also had our fair share of luck, at least 1 dropped catch, and Khawaja just french cut one over the stumps
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by Jim05 »

Lightning McQueen wrote:Has the pitch settled down or are we just playing more mature shots?

Bit of both plus the fact that after Boult and Southee their bowlers are mediocre. Couple of them wouldn't trouble a district side
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55280
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has thanked: 4976 times
Been thanked: 9056 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by Lightning McQueen »

Cheers. mal gave me a run down also along similar lines.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
mal
Coach
Posts: 32316
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:45 pm
Has thanked: 2710 times
Been thanked: 2993 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by mal »

Lightning McQueen wrote:Has the pitch settled down or are we just playing more mature shots?


Warner Smith Khawaja all playing close to their natural games , as they most probably should
Smith lucky at times
Khawaja playing well enough
Warner happened to get out
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64108
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8792 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by Booney »

What can Smith achieve in the next 2-3 years, if he continues in this vein of form?

The problem for the bowlers is he gets to 20-25 so quickly he's set within 15 minutes of scratching centre into the pitch. Most batsmen fart arse around for half an hour, maybe look set when they're 35-40. Smith walks out, punches on through midwicket from the second one he faces and he's away.

2015 was a pretty special year for him, '16 could just be massive.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by bennymacca »

Booney wrote:What can Smith achieve in the next 2-3 years, if he continues in this vein of form?

The problem for the bowlers is he gets to 20-25 so quickly he's set within 15 minutes of scratching centre into the pitch. Most batsmen fart arse around for half an hour, maybe look set when they're 35-40. Smith walks out, punches on through midwicket from the second one he faces and he's away.

2015 was a pretty special year for him, '16 could just be massive.


Thats a great point. He is just so good at manufacturing singles he never gets bogged down. Would be so hard to bowl to
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by bennymacca »

Umpire calls a no ball, Voges gets bowled, and it turns it out his foot was massively behind the line!

Terrible decision by the umpire, the Kiwi commentators are livid
Dogwatcher
Coach
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Team: Central District
Team: Collingwood
Team: Elizabeth
Location: The Bronx
Has thanked: 1425 times
Been thanked: 1153 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by Dogwatcher »

Can they use a referral on that? Probably not, I guess.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 169 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by Grahaml »

Not good enough. Scoreboard operator will be sacked for not getting that replay up in time.
User avatar
locky801
Coach
Posts: 60806
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has thanked: 4870 times
Been thanked: 1566 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by locky801 »

bennymacca wrote:Umpire calls a no ball, Voges gets bowled, and it turns it out his foot was massively behind the line!

Terrible decision by the umpire, the Kiwi commentators are livid


Sh.t happens ;)
Life is about moments, Create them
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 394 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by stampy »

me hearts bleedn for our bogan cousins
Go The Tiges!!!
User avatar
Grenville
Veteran
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:53 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 262 times
Been thanked: 761 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by Grenville »

The Ovis aries defilers will be an angry mob tonight.
User avatar
carey
Coach
Posts: 21519
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:20 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Paralowie
Location: From a place i shouldn't be.
Has thanked: 2963 times
Been thanked: 3162 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by carey »

2 things I find hugely humorous like normal on this forum.

Warner hits that for 6 you all call him a hero he gets out and his a 'spud' :roll:
And the No-Ball, Reverse the sides. If that was against Aust. Minimum of 6 pages of tears.
you've gota keep on keep'n on .........
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by whufc »

It is odd

If a wicket is taken on an umpire called good ball they can check and call a batsmen back if it is a no ball

If a wicket is taken on a umpire called no ball they can't check and give a batsmen out if it's not a I ball
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by whufc »

carey wrote:2 things I find hugely humorous like normal on this forum.

Warner hits that for 6 you all call him a hero he gets out and his a 'spud' :roll:
And the No-Ball, Reverse the sides. If that was against Aust. Minimum of 6 pages of tears.


Happens on every sports forum everywhere in the world

I think only one person called Warner a spud and others commented it was a shit shot which it was by virtue of him getting out to it
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
Dogwatcher
Coach
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Team: Central District
Team: Collingwood
Team: Elizabeth
Location: The Bronx
Has thanked: 1425 times
Been thanked: 1153 times
Contact:

Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.

Post by Dogwatcher »

Can't say I'm upset about the Voges decision - it seems a case of karma for the Kiwis.
But...there were plenty of people on here saying the right decision had been made in the Mitch Marsh replay decision and "play on", it wasn't all one-sided debate.
I would like to see the right decision made. In this case the wrong decision was made. If people think that decision should have been reversed - the rules need to be changed, just as they need to be changed if we're going to allow umpires to change their minds on decisions due to in-ground replays.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 151 guests