Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
whufc wrote:bennymacca wrote:stan wrote:A deck like this takes discipline. If you go for a swing it will get you. Just dont be stupid and back to basics.
The pitch will not allow you to dominate the bowling for long. So back to basics, keep out the good balls, hit the bad ones.
I agree.
But... warner...
But what
I was always going to jinx him
- stan
- Coach
- Posts: 15668
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Team: Goodwood Saints
- Location: North Eastern Suburbs
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
bennymacca wrote:whufc wrote:bennymacca wrote:stan wrote:A deck like this takes discipline. If you go for a swing it will get you. Just dont be stupid and back to basics.
The pitch will not allow you to dominate the bowling for long. So back to basics, keep out the good balls, hit the bad ones.
I agree.
But... warner...
But what
I was always going to jinx him
Well that was always going to happen I guess.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
- Lightning McQueen
- Coach
- Posts: 55280
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
- Location: Radiator Springs
- Has thanked: 4976 times
- Been thanked: 9056 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Has the pitch settled down or are we just playing more mature shots?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Lightning McQueen wrote:Has the pitch settled down or are we just playing more mature shots?
From what i can gather from watching on my phone, we have batted pretty well. But we have also had our fair share of luck, at least 1 dropped catch, and Khawaja just french cut one over the stumps
-
Jim05
- Coach
- Posts: 49466
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Essendon
- Team: South Gawler
- Has thanked: 1136 times
- Been thanked: 4041 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Lightning McQueen wrote:Has the pitch settled down or are we just playing more mature shots?
Bit of both plus the fact that after Boult and Southee their bowlers are mediocre. Couple of them wouldn't trouble a district side
- Lightning McQueen
- Coach
- Posts: 55280
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
- Location: Radiator Springs
- Has thanked: 4976 times
- Been thanked: 9056 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Cheers. mal gave me a run down also along similar lines.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
-
mal
- Coach
- Posts: 32316
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:45 pm
- Has thanked: 2710 times
- Been thanked: 2993 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Lightning McQueen wrote:Has the pitch settled down or are we just playing more mature shots?
Warner Smith Khawaja all playing close to their natural games , as they most probably should
Smith lucky at times
Khawaja playing well enough
Warner happened to get out
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64108
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8792 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
What can Smith achieve in the next 2-3 years, if he continues in this vein of form?
The problem for the bowlers is he gets to 20-25 so quickly he's set within 15 minutes of scratching centre into the pitch. Most batsmen fart arse around for half an hour, maybe look set when they're 35-40. Smith walks out, punches on through midwicket from the second one he faces and he's away.
2015 was a pretty special year for him, '16 could just be massive.
The problem for the bowlers is he gets to 20-25 so quickly he's set within 15 minutes of scratching centre into the pitch. Most batsmen fart arse around for half an hour, maybe look set when they're 35-40. Smith walks out, punches on through midwicket from the second one he faces and he's away.
2015 was a pretty special year for him, '16 could just be massive.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Booney wrote:What can Smith achieve in the next 2-3 years, if he continues in this vein of form?
The problem for the bowlers is he gets to 20-25 so quickly he's set within 15 minutes of scratching centre into the pitch. Most batsmen fart arse around for half an hour, maybe look set when they're 35-40. Smith walks out, punches on through midwicket from the second one he faces and he's away.
2015 was a pretty special year for him, '16 could just be massive.
Thats a great point. He is just so good at manufacturing singles he never gets bogged down. Would be so hard to bowl to
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Umpire calls a no ball, Voges gets bowled, and it turns it out his foot was massively behind the line!
Terrible decision by the umpire, the Kiwi commentators are livid
Terrible decision by the umpire, the Kiwi commentators are livid
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Can they use a referral on that? Probably not, I guess.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
-
Grahaml
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4812
- Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 169 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Not good enough. Scoreboard operator will be sacked for not getting that replay up in time.
- locky801
- Coach
- Posts: 60806
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:11 pm
- Location: working all around Australia and loving it
- Has thanked: 4870 times
- Been thanked: 1566 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
bennymacca wrote:Umpire calls a no ball, Voges gets bowled, and it turns it out his foot was massively behind the line!
Terrible decision by the umpire, the Kiwi commentators are livid
Sh.t happens
Life is about moments, Create them
-
stampy
- Coach
- Posts: 9170
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Christies Beach
- Location: at church asking for divine intervention
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 394 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
me hearts bleedn for our bogan cousins
Go The Tiges!!!
- Grenville
- Veteran
- Posts: 3709
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:53 pm
- Team: Central District
- Has thanked: 262 times
- Been thanked: 761 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
The Ovis aries defilers will be an angry mob tonight.
- carey
- Coach
- Posts: 21519
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:20 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Team: Paralowie
- Location: From a place i shouldn't be.
- Has thanked: 2963 times
- Been thanked: 3162 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
2 things I find hugely humorous like normal on this forum.
Warner hits that for 6 you all call him a hero he gets out and his a 'spud'
And the No-Ball, Reverse the sides. If that was against Aust. Minimum of 6 pages of tears.
Warner hits that for 6 you all call him a hero he gets out and his a 'spud'
And the No-Ball, Reverse the sides. If that was against Aust. Minimum of 6 pages of tears.
you've gota keep on keep'n on .........
-
whufc
- Coach
- Posts: 29217
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: BSR
- Location: Blakeview
- Has thanked: 6065 times
- Been thanked: 2933 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
It is odd
If a wicket is taken on an umpire called good ball they can check and call a batsmen back if it is a no ball
If a wicket is taken on a umpire called no ball they can't check and give a batsmen out if it's not a I ball
If a wicket is taken on an umpire called good ball they can check and call a batsmen back if it is a no ball
If a wicket is taken on a umpire called no ball they can't check and give a batsmen out if it's not a I ball
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
-
whufc
- Coach
- Posts: 29217
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: BSR
- Location: Blakeview
- Has thanked: 6065 times
- Been thanked: 2933 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
carey wrote:2 things I find hugely humorous like normal on this forum.
Warner hits that for 6 you all call him a hero he gets out and his a 'spud'![]()
And the No-Ball, Reverse the sides. If that was against Aust. Minimum of 6 pages of tears.
Happens on every sports forum everywhere in the world
I think only one person called Warner a spud and others commented it was a shit shot which it was by virtue of him getting out to it
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
Re: Aust tour squad v NZ announced - Sayers in.
Can't say I'm upset about the Voges decision - it seems a case of karma for the Kiwis.
But...there were plenty of people on here saying the right decision had been made in the Mitch Marsh replay decision and "play on", it wasn't all one-sided debate.
I would like to see the right decision made. In this case the wrong decision was made. If people think that decision should have been reversed - the rules need to be changed, just as they need to be changed if we're going to allow umpires to change their minds on decisions due to in-ground replays.
But...there were plenty of people on here saying the right decision had been made in the Mitch Marsh replay decision and "play on", it wasn't all one-sided debate.
I would like to see the right decision made. In this case the wrong decision was made. If people think that decision should have been reversed - the rules need to be changed, just as they need to be changed if we're going to allow umpires to change their minds on decisions due to in-ground replays.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 148 guests
