MRP

[Q.]

Oh, i thought you were asking my opinion, rather than recite the rules of the MRP

[Jimmy_041]

What do you think of the ruling, and the subsequent appeal @Q.?

About right from the start, very similar to Toby Greene punching Daniel in the chops. Houli was always going to have the games downgraded due to clean record.

You don't think the fact Lamb was knocked unconscious should have added games?

Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.

I appreciate that's your view but I disagree. The impact is part of the process as it is in a Court

[Q.]

Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.

I appreciate that's your view but I disagree. The impact is part of the process as it is in a Court

People are physiologically different though. The same whack on a different player and he gets up and plays on...does that make it any less of an offence?

[HH3]

Oh, i thought you were asking my opinion, rather than recite the rules of the MRP

Yep, fair call. I should've asked what I meant a different way.

[Jimmy_041]

Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.

I appreciate that's your view but I disagree. The impact is part of the process as it is in a Court

People are physiologically different though. The same whack on a different player and he gets up and plays on...does that make it any less of an offence?

It does if he has 12 facial fractures compared to none

[Q.]

Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.

I appreciate that's your view but I disagree. The impact is part of the process as it is in a Court

People are physiologically different though. The same whack on a different player and he gets up and plays on...does that make it any less of an offence?

It does if he has 12 facial fractures compared to none

He should've drunk more milk

[Jimmy_041]

It does if he has 12 facial fractures compared to none

He should've drunk more milk

Paleo Pete reckons the bloke with 12 facial fractures does

[JK]

Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.

I appreciate that's your view but I disagree. The impact is part of the process as it is in a Court

People are physiologically different though. The same whack on a different player and he gets up and plays on...does that make it any less of an offence?

Both players are fine if someone doesn't whack them though, so the transgressor is responsible for damage caused.

[Jimmy_041]

It was graded Intentional/High/High Impact, so the High Impact covers the fact that he was knocked out. Tribunal chairman, Ross Howie pointed out that all there has to be is an intention to strike Lamb, regardless of where the blow might land or whether there was an intention to hurt. I believe he wil end up with 4 down to 3...which is about right in my eyes

If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8
He deliberately hit him. Too bad whether he's a nice guy or not
And calling him afterwards to apologise is just a trick of the experienced eh @morell?

[The Bedge]

If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8

Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.

[Jimmy_041]

If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8

Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.

No

[The Bedge]

If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8

Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.

No

Ok

[HH3]

If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8

Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.

No

Ok

Imagine if this was how everyone argued on here....I'd still be on less than 200 posts.

[MW]

If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8

Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.

No

Ok

My god, it's like my arguments with my missus

[Jimmy_041]

Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.

No

Ok

Imagine if this was how everyone argued on here....I'd still be on less than 200 posts.

No you wouldn't

[HH3]

Imagine if this was how everyone argued on here....I'd still be on less than 200 posts.

No you wouldn't

Ok

[Jimmy_041]

Imagine if this was how everyone argued on here....I'd still be on less than 200 posts.

No you wouldn't

Ok

Now you're learning (or maybe not)

[daysofourlives]

Does anyone think he will get anything other than 3 tonight?? Will appease everyone I would think. I think he should get 6 down to 5 for good record but there's no chance of that happening

[The Bedge]

Does anyone think he will get anything other than 3 tonight?? Will appease everyone I would think. I think he should get 6 down to 5 for good record but there's no chance of that happening

When a player appeals and loses, they run the risk of an increased penalty.. does that mean if the AFL appeals and loses, they run the risk of the player getting less games?

[HH3]

Does anyone think he will get anything other than 3 tonight?? Will appease everyone I would think. I think he should get 6 down to 5 for good record but there's no chance of that happening

When a player appeals and loses, they run the risk of an increased penalty.. does that mean if the AFL appeals and loses, they run the risk of the player getting less games?

No.