The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12494
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Pseudo »

85 points blew out to 109 by the end of the quarter. 9.6 to 1.0 in the final term.

Not to worry; the bananas get their AFL talent back to play the other AFL team next week. Compromised any?

I wonder if the WAFL's metrics are also up?
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
spell_check
Coach
Posts: 18872
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:56 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 258 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by spell_check »

LPH wrote:Don't stop there, Lads.
Bradman & Taylor's 334 is the next milestone 8)


We should be aiming for BC Lara I reckon

Even though this is a bit inaccurate in itself, this will give you an idea how this seasons rainfall stacks up against others:
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=20098
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Team: Collingwood
Team: Kenilworth
Location: Craven Cottage
Has thanked: 541 times
Been thanked: 326 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by LPH »

No-one saw this coming :roll:

Only a matter of time for it to happen here...

https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport ... n-thunder/
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by RB »

A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
spell_check
Coach
Posts: 18872
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:56 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 258 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by spell_check »

RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)


In my records from 1983, Ben Hart and Peter Turner for North in the 1st Semi of 1990 is the only instance of two debutants in a final
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62506
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5168 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

I bet if anyone tried to raise this with the SANFL, local Clubs and Rowey you would get shut down.
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by RB »

spell_check wrote:
RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)


In my records from 1983, Ben Hart and Peter Turner for North in the 1st Semi of 1990 is the only instance of two debutants in a final

Wow, one minute! :grin:
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
mal
Coach
Posts: 32312
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:45 pm
Has thanked: 2710 times
Been thanked: 2993 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by mal »

Peel Blunder
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
Posts: 3148
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Has thanked: 171 times
Been thanked: 159 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Mic »

spell_check wrote:
RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)


In my records from 1983, Ben Hart and Peter Turner for North in the 1st Semi of 1990 is the only instance of two debutants in a final


Both were only 16 years old too!
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62506
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5168 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

mal wrote:Peel Blunder


Only if Fraudmantle dont win the flag
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
robranisgod
League - Best 21
Posts: 2081
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:36 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Flinders University
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 281 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by robranisgod »

Mic wrote:
spell_check wrote:
RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)


In my records from 1983, Ben Hart and Peter Turner for North in the 1st Semi of 1990 is the only instance of two debutants in a final


Both were only 16 years old too!

And both did well that day. The only thing that puzzles most people who saw them both then and early in their career is what happened to Peter Turner. As good as Ben Hart looked and turned out to be, everyone thought that Peter Turner was the better prospect.
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
Posts: 3148
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Has thanked: 171 times
Been thanked: 159 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Mic »

robranisgod wrote:
Mic wrote:
spell_check wrote:
RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)


In my records from 1983, Ben Hart and Peter Turner for North in the 1st Semi of 1990 is the only instance of two debutants in a final


Both were only 16 years old too!

And both did well that day. The only thing that puzzles most people who saw them both then and early in their career is what happened to Peter Turner. As good as Ben Hart looked and turned out to be, everyone thought that Peter Turner was the better prospect.


Good point; he had so much talent.
johntheclaret
Coach
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Team: North Adelaide
Has thanked: 409 times
Been thanked: 580 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by johntheclaret »

Ok back on thread please.

No AFL in the WAFL
No AFL in the SANFL
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by therisingblues »

On top of everything else. I don't get why we can't have our final in its normal spot. Obviously it'd avoid potential final round player circuses caused by AFL sides resting players. Then we still get our place in the sun by having our grand final the week after the AFL finishes, and even the preliminary final thing day after the AFL grannie provides a footy fix for those who don't want the footy season to end. Those two stand alone finals possibly also provide a hook to bring in the occasional AFL supporters to one or two sanfl games a year.

No afl in the SANFL, but in the meantime can't we at least improve the conditions of the deal?
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by topsywaldron »

therisingblues wrote:On top of everything else. I don't get why we can't have our final in its normal spot.


Didn't suit the AFL clubs in the old time slot would be my guess.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Team: Collingwood
Team: Kenilworth
Location: Craven Cottage
Has thanked: 541 times
Been thanked: 326 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by LPH »

Improve the conditions?
I would've though both the PAPs & the Cows are very happy with the current arrangement, don't you?
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
tipper
League - Top 5
Posts: 2896
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:45 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Peake
Has thanked: 362 times
Been thanked: 556 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by tipper »

LPH wrote:Improve the conditions?
I would've though both the PAPs & the Cows are very happy with the current arrangement, don't you?


and according to the media, the sanfl spokespeople, and even some of the club delegates, that seems to be all that matters..... :oops:
Reddeer
Reserves
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:32 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Reddeer »

tipper wrote:
LPH wrote:Improve the conditions?
I would've though both the PAPs & the Cows are very happy with the current arrangement, don't you?


and according to the media, the sanfl spokespeople, and even some of the club delegates, that seems to be all that matters..... :oops:

Of course it is all that matters. The comp is so compromised now that it doesn't matter at all.
Winning a premiership and magarey medal will no longer mean much at all
integrity Humbug
Also why would the professionals be allowed to drop back players from the final AFL game to to SANFL. They should be excluded if they played the last AFL for the club. Another case of non existent fairness of the state of the SANFL
Verschrikkelyk!!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2936 times
Been thanked: 4838 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Dutchy »

therisingblues wrote:On top of everything else. I don't get why we can't have our final in its normal spot. Obviously it'd avoid potential final round player circuses caused by AFL sides resting players. Then we still get our place in the sun by having our grand final the week after the AFL finishes, and even the preliminary final thing day after the AFL grannie provides a footy fix for those who don't want the footy season to end. Those two stand alone finals possibly also provide a hook to bring in the occasional AFL supporters to one or two sanfl games a year.

No afl in the SANFL, but in the meantime can't we at least improve the conditions of the deal?


There was no way the AFL teams were going to come in unless the SANFL brought the final series forward. For example, this year that would make the GF 11th October and if Port made it then their AFL listed players would not come back for preseason until early December after their mandatory 8 week break, when most teams will be starting early November. SANFL bent over, simple.
Reddeer
Reserves
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:32 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Reddeer »

Dutchy wrote:
therisingblues wrote:On top of everything else. I don't get why we can't have our final in its normal spot. Obviously it'd avoid potential final round player circuses caused by AFL sides resting players. Then we still get our place in the sun by having our grand final the week after the AFL finishes, and even the preliminary final thing day after the AFL grannie provides a footy fix for those who don't want the footy season to end. Those two stand alone finals possibly also provide a hook to bring in the occasional AFL supporters to one or two sanfl games a year.

No afl in the SANFL, but in the meantime can't we at least improve the conditions of the deal?


There was no way the AFL teams were going to come in unless the SANFL brought the final series forward. For example, this year that would make the GF 11th October and if Port made it then their AFL listed players would not come back for preseason until early December after their mandatory 8 week break, when most teams will be starting early November. SANFL bent over, simple.

Sorry but that just shows how weak the SANFL are. It used to be our comp so they play by OUR rules not the way they wanted it.
RIP SANFL
Verschrikkelyk!!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 275 guests